Modeling electrical impedance in brain tissue with diffusion tensor imaging for functional neurosurgery applications

<i>Objective.</i>Decades ago, neurosurgeons used electrical impedance measurements in the brain for coarse intraoperative tissue differentiation. Over time, these techniques were largely replaced by more refined imaging and electrophysiological localization. Today, advanced methods of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and finite element method (FEM) modeling may permit non-invasive, high-resolution intracerebral impedance prediction. However, expectations for tissue-impedance relationships and experimentally verified parameters for impedance modeling in human brains are lacking. This study seeks to address this need.<i>Approach.</i>We used FEM to simulate high-resolution single- and dual-electrode impedance measurements along linear electrode trajectories through (1) canonical gray and white matter tissue models, and (2) selected anatomic structures within whole-brain patient DTI-based models. We then compared intraoperative impedance measurements taken at known locations along deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgical trajectories with model predictions to evaluate model accuracy and refine model parameters.<i>Main results.</i>In DTI-FEM models, single- and dual-electrode configurations performed similarly. While only dual-electrode configurations were sensitive to white matter fiber orientation, other influences on impedance, such as white matter density, enabled single-electrode impedance measurements to display significant spatial variation even within purely white matter structures. We compared 308 intraoperative single-electrode impedance measurements in five DBS patients to DTI-FEM predictions at one-to-one corresponding locations. After calibration of model coefficients to these data, predicted impedances reliably estimated intraoperative measurements in all patients (R=0.784±0.116,n=5). Through this study, we derived an updated value for the slope coefficient of the DTI conductance model published by Tuch<i>et al</i>,k=0.0649 S⋅smm-3 (originalk=0.844), for use specifically in humans at physiological frequencies.<i>Significance.</i>This is the first study to compare impedance estimates from imaging-based models of human brain tissue to experimental measurements at the same locations<i>in vivo</i>. Accurate, non-invasive, imaging-based impedance prediction has numerous applications in functional neurosurgery, including tissue mapping, intraoperative electrode localization, and DBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7db2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling electrical impedance in brain tissue with diffusion tensor imaging for functional neurosurgery applications

Charles W. Lu, Parag G. Patil, Karlo A. Malaga, N B Kumar et al.
1 citations
Journal of Neural Engineering
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
0.21
article

Modeling electrical impedance in brain tissue with diffusion tensor imaging for functional neurosurgery applications

Charles W. Lu, Parag G. Patil, Karlo A. Malaga, N B Kumar, Aidan Ahamparam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Decades ago, neurosurgeons used electrical impedance measurements in the brain for coarse intraoperative tissue differentiation. Over time, these techniques were largely replaced by more refined imaging and electrophysiological localization. Today, advanced methods of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and finite element method (FEM) modeling may permit non-invasive, high-resolution intracerebral impedance prediction. However, expectations for tissue-impedance relationships and experimentally verified parameters for impedance modeling in human brains are lacking. This study seeks to address this need.<i>Approach.</i>We used FEM to simulate high-resolution single- and dual-electrode impedance measurements along linear electrode trajectories through (1) canonical gray and white matter tissue models, and (2) selected anatomic structures within whole-brain patient DTI-based models. We then compared intraoperative impedance measurements taken at known locations along deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgical trajectories with model predictions to evaluate model accuracy and refine model parameters.<i>Main results.</i>In DTI-FEM models, single- and dual-electrode configurations performed similarly. While only dual-electrode configurations were sensitive to white matter fiber orientation, other influences on impedance, such as white matter density, enabled single-electrode impedance measurements to display significant spatial variation even within purely white matter structures. We compared 308 intraoperative single-electrode impedance measurements in five DBS patients to DTI-FEM predictions at one-to-one corresponding locations. After calibration of model coefficients to these data, predicted impedances reliably estimated intraoperative measurements in all patients (R=0.784±0.116,n=5). Through this study, we derived an updated value for the slope coefficient of the DTI conductance model published by Tuch<i>et al</i>,k=0.0649 S⋅smm-3 (originalk=0.844), for use specifically in humans at physiological frequencies.<i>Significance.</i>This is the first study to compare impedance estimates from imaging-based models of human brain tissue to experimental measurements at the same locations<i>in vivo</i>. Accurate, non-invasive, imaging-based impedance prediction has numerous applications in functional neurosurgery, including tissue mapping, intraoperative electrode localization, and DBS.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 21(5)
Seattle Pacific University (US), Bucknell University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.