Changes in muscle cross-sectional area during two menstrual cycles may not be exclusively attributed to resistance training

This study investigated the impact of menstrual cycle (MC) phases and resistance training (RT) on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in two MCs utilizing a within-subject design. Twenty women with regular MCs had their legs randomly allocated to either the control (CON) or RT condition, which included 16 training sessions over two MCs. CSA, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were assessed during the menstruation (M), ovulation (O), and luteal (L) phases in the first (M1, O1, L1) and second (M2, O2, L2) MCs and at the beginning of the third MC (M3). P4 values were significantly higher during the luteal phase than during menstruation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and ovulation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant differences in E2 concentrations were observed between the MC phases (<i>P</i> = 0.08). For the RT condition, the CSA showed significant increases at O2, L2, and M3 compared to baseline (M1) (all <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant changes were observed for the CON condition during the two MCs (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, RT condition showed a significant change in average CSA across two MCs. Additionally, individual analyses revealed that 19 participants showed variation in CSA above or below the minimum detectable difference during the two MCs. These findings suggest that changes in muscle CSA observed during two MCs may not be exclusively attributed to RT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in muscle cross-sectional area during two menstrual cycles may not be exclusively attributed to resistance training

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Nathalia F. Dias, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Diego Bittencourt et al.
1 citations
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Exercise and Physiological Responses
0.25
article

Changes in muscle cross-sectional area during two menstrual cycles may not be exclusively attributed to resistance training

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Nathalia F. Dias, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Diego Bittencourt, Talisson S. Chaves, Deivid Gomes da Silva, Maíra C. Scarpelli, Eduardo O. De Souza, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Ricardo A. Medalha, Paulo Roberto Tartuce Filho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of menstrual cycle (MC) phases and resistance training (RT) on muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in two MCs utilizing a within-subject design. Twenty women with regular MCs had their legs randomly allocated to either the control (CON) or RT condition, which included 16 training sessions over two MCs. CSA, estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) were assessed during the menstruation (M), ovulation (O), and luteal (L) phases in the first (M1, O1, L1) and second (M2, O2, L2) MCs and at the beginning of the third MC (M3). P4 values were significantly higher during the luteal phase than during menstruation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and ovulation (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant differences in E2 concentrations were observed between the MC phases (<i>P</i> = 0.08). For the RT condition, the CSA showed significant increases at O2, L2, and M3 compared to baseline (M1) (all <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No significant changes were observed for the CON condition during the two MCs (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, RT condition showed a significant change in average CSA across two MCs. Additionally, individual analyses revealed that 19 participants showed variation in CSA above or below the minimum detectable difference during the two MCs. These findings suggest that changes in muscle CSA observed during two MCs may not be exclusively attributed to RT.

Applied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismVol. 49(12)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Tampa (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.