Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?

At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. • Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications. • Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends. • Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants. • Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?

Béatrice Mésini, Coline Perrin, Brigitte Nougarèdes, Myriam Campardon et al.
1 citations
Land Use Policy
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
1.03
article

Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?

Béatrice Mésini, Coline Perrin, Brigitte Nougarèdes, Myriam Campardon, Roy Hammond, Laurie Vanel, Romain Melot, Dyhia Brahimi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. • Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications. • Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends. • Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants. • Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.

Land Use PolicyVol. 147
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (MA), Université de Montpellier (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Agropolis International (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire Méditerranéen de Préhistoire Europe Afrique (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Biodiversité, Agroécologie et Aménagement du Paysage (FR)
Fondation Daniel et Nina Carasso
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.