Hydrometeorology-wildfire relationship analysis based on a wildfire bivariate probabilistic framework in different ecoregions of the continental United States

• A probabilistic framework is used to describe wildfire bivariate characteristic. • Soil moisture, precipitation, and temperature dominated wildfire-prone month. • The dominated hydrometeorological factors of wildfire vary with ecoregions. • The Continental United States can be divided into new four wildfire regimes. Wildfires are a natural part of the ecosystem in the U.S.. It is vital to classify wildfires using a comprehensive approach that simultaneously considers wildfire activity (the number of wildfires) and burned area. On this basis, the influence of hydrometeorological variables on wildfires can be further analyzed. Therefore, this study first classified wildfire types using a wildfire bivariate probability framework. Then, by considering six hydrometeorological variables, the dominant hydrometeorological variables for different wildfire types in 17 ecoregions of the United States were quantified. In addition, based on the results of this hydrometeorology-wildfire relationship analysis, we obtained new clusters that simultaneously considered wildfire characteristics and the impact of hydrometeorology on wildfires. In particular, the results were as follows: (1) Through the probability of wildfire bivariate statistical characteristics, wildfires could be classified into five types in this paper: WT-1 (mega-wildfire), WT-2 (joint wildfire-1), WT-3 (joint extremes), WT-4 (joint wildfire-2), and WT-5 (super frequent wildfires); (2) The dominant hydrometeorological variables under different wildfire types were discussed in 17 ecoregions of the United States; and (3) In the four new cluster regions, intensifying droughts are a concern in clusters 1 and 4, while there are multiple concerns in cluster 3, namely, stronger winds, higher temperatures, and more drought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110215
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrometeorology-wildfire relationship analysis based on a wildfire bivariate probabilistic framework in different ecoregions of the continental United States

Ke Shi, So Kazama, Yoshiya Touge
2 citations
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
article

Hydrometeorology-wildfire relationship analysis based on a wildfire bivariate probabilistic framework in different ecoregions of the continental United States

Ke Shi, So Kazama, Yoshiya Touge
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• A probabilistic framework is used to describe wildfire bivariate characteristic. • Soil moisture, precipitation, and temperature dominated wildfire-prone month. • The dominated hydrometeorological factors of wildfire vary with ecoregions. • The Continental United States can be divided into new four wildfire regimes. Wildfires are a natural part of the ecosystem in the U.S.. It is vital to classify wildfires using a comprehensive approach that simultaneously considers wildfire activity (the number of wildfires) and burned area. On this basis, the influence of hydrometeorological variables on wildfires can be further analyzed. Therefore, this study first classified wildfire types using a wildfire bivariate probability framework. Then, by considering six hydrometeorological variables, the dominant hydrometeorological variables for different wildfire types in 17 ecoregions of the United States were quantified. In addition, based on the results of this hydrometeorology-wildfire relationship analysis, we obtained new clusters that simultaneously considered wildfire characteristics and the impact of hydrometeorology on wildfires. In particular, the results were as follows: (1) Through the probability of wildfire bivariate statistical characteristics, wildfires could be classified into five types in this paper: WT-1 (mega-wildfire), WT-2 (joint wildfire-1), WT-3 (joint extremes), WT-4 (joint wildfire-2), and WT-5 (super frequent wildfires); (2) The dominant hydrometeorological variables under different wildfire types were discussed in 17 ecoregions of the United States; and (3) In the four new cluster regions, intensifying droughts are a concern in clusters 1 and 4, while there are multiple concerns in cluster 3, namely, stronger winds, higher temperatures, and more drought.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 358
Tohoku University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.