Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential to address climate change and serve to compensate for legacy and hard-to-abate greenhouse gas emissions. Although near-term emissions reductions should be the priority, development and deployment of CDR must proceed now to ensure that relevant technologies are ready at scale in the future. Despite a rapid growth in CDR purchases, no single standardized methodology for evaluating project-level net CO2 removal exists. Life cycle assessment (LCA) frequently produces net-negative emissions footprints, but only a small subset of those systems achieves a net flux of CO2 out of the atmosphere. In contrast to LCA, CDR accounting uses expansive system boundaries and excludes avoidance credits to distinguish between systems that achieve net removal from those that only contribute to emissions mitigation. This primer discusses a framework and set of metrics for CDR accounting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Earth
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.012
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal

Sarah E. Baker, Corinne Donahue Scown, Corey Myers, Sarah Nordahl et al.
17 citations
One Earth
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.61
article

Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal

Sarah E. Baker, Corinne Donahue Scown, Corey Myers, Sarah Nordahl, Rebecca J. Hanes, Kimberley K. Mayfield
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential to address climate change and serve to compensate for legacy and hard-to-abate greenhouse gas emissions. Although near-term emissions reductions should be the priority, development and deployment of CDR must proceed now to ensure that relevant technologies are ready at scale in the future. Despite a rapid growth in CDR purchases, no single standardized methodology for evaluating project-level net CO2 removal exists. Life cycle assessment (LCA) frequently produces net-negative emissions footprints, but only a small subset of those systems achieves a net flux of CO2 out of the atmosphere. In contrast to LCA, CDR accounting uses expansive system boundaries and excludes avoidance credits to distinguish between systems that achieve net removal from those that only contribute to emissions mitigation. This primer discusses a framework and set of metrics for CDR accounting.

One EarthVol. 7(9)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Energy Biosciences Institute (US), Joint BioEnergy Institute (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal — Sarah E. Baker, Corinne Donahue Scown, et al. · One Earth (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS