Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly recognized as essential for achieving the Paris Agreement's climate goals. Current CDR strategies primarily involve land-based measures, such as afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon enhancement. These approaches, often labeled as nature-based solutions (NBS) or natural climate solutions (NCS), have sparked debate due to their potential adverse effects on biodiversity and uncertainty around the scale and durability of potential climate benefits. This paper introduces a framework for evaluating trade-offs in land-based CDR activities following the recent United Nations Environment Assembly definition of NBS. This framework emphasizes ecosystem integrity, human rights, and sustainable development, aligning with the objectives of the three Rio Conventions, which provide a guardrail to inform pathways toward feasible and equitable implementation. By applying this framework, we provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental and social constraints on CDR, ensuring that climate mitigation efforts do not compromise biodiversity, ecosystem services, or human well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Earth
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.009
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions

Setu Pelz, Kate Dooley, Alexander Norton
7 citations
One Earth
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
article

Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions

Setu Pelz, Kate Dooley, Alexander Norton
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly recognized as essential for achieving the Paris Agreement's climate goals. Current CDR strategies primarily involve land-based measures, such as afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon enhancement. These approaches, often labeled as nature-based solutions (NBS) or natural climate solutions (NCS), have sparked debate due to their potential adverse effects on biodiversity and uncertainty around the scale and durability of potential climate benefits. This paper introduces a framework for evaluating trade-offs in land-based CDR activities following the recent United Nations Environment Assembly definition of NBS. This framework emphasizes ecosystem integrity, human rights, and sustainable development, aligning with the objectives of the three Rio Conventions, which provide a guardrail to inform pathways toward feasible and equitable implementation. By applying this framework, we provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental and social constraints on CDR, ensuring that climate mitigation efforts do not compromise biodiversity, ecosystem services, or human well-being.

One EarthVol. 7(9)
Australian National University (AU), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.