The asymmetric power model 20 years on

Abstract It is over 20 years since the publication of the Asymmetric Power Model (APM). In the ensuing period, Britain has faced multiple challenges: the increasing fragmentation of public services; austerity politics; devolution; and, most recently, coronavirus disease and Brexit. It is this backdrop which provides the context to this article. First, it addresses how the literature has subsequently evolved. It then examines what has changed over the last two decades while also emphasizing what remains the same. Here, we highlight issues regarding both increased inequality and instability, focusing particularly on tension emerging from a de-centralizing-recentralizing approach to governance. The article concludes by offering a revised APM as a means of understanding British politics moving forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae026
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The asymmetric power model 20 years on

Martin J. Smith, David Marsh, David Richards
11 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Social Policy and Reform Studies
24.54
article

The asymmetric power model 20 years on

Martin J. Smith, David Marsh, David Richards
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract It is over 20 years since the publication of the Asymmetric Power Model (APM). In the ensuing period, Britain has faced multiple challenges: the increasing fragmentation of public services; austerity politics; devolution; and, most recently, coronavirus disease and Brexit. It is this backdrop which provides the context to this article. First, it addresses how the literature has subsequently evolved. It then examines what has changed over the last two decades while also emphasizing what remains the same. Here, we highlight issues regarding both increased inequality and instability, focusing particularly on tension emerging from a de-centralizing-recentralizing approach to governance. The article concludes by offering a revised APM as a means of understanding British politics moving forward.

Parliamentary AffairsVol. 77(4)
University of Canberra (AU), University of Manchester (GB), University of York (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Nuffield Foundation, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
24.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.