Comparison Of Body Strength Between Cross Country Skiers And Long Distance Track And Field Athletes

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is comparing the upper and lower body strength of cross country skiers(CC) with long distance track and field athletes(LA). METHODS: The study included 18 adult cross country skiers, 22 long distance athletes. The participants were measured for upper and lower limb muscular strength, and anaerobic power. The collected data were organized using Windows SPSS 26.0, and descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests. RESULTS: The results of the CC average grip strength for the left, right hands (41.35 ± 4.58, 41.70 ± 4.64, 41.53 ± 4.51 kg) was significantly higher than that of LA (27.73 ± 3.66, 31.07 ± 4.82, 29.40 ± 4.21) (p < .05). The back strength was also higher in CC (117.20 ± 9.08 kg) compared to LA (79.21 ± 17.65 kg) (p < .001). But power was higher in CC in vertical, long jumps (p < .05). In female athletes, CC showed higher strength in the left (26.35 ± 3.53 kg), right (28.85 ± 1.55 kg) hands, average grip strength (27.60 ± 1.33 kg), and back strength (76.63 ± 7.94 kg) compared to LA (p < .05). There were no significant differences in muscular endurance for sit ups, but in push ups, CC performed more repetitions (57.75 ± 6.80) compared to LA (45.43 ± 5.80) (p = 0.011). Power, measured by vertical, long jumps, was also higher in female CC (p < .05). The analysis of isokinetic strength differences in both male and female athletes showed that male CC had higher left quadriceps strength relative to body weight (299.50 ± 39.79%BW) compared to LA (246.81 ± 47.66%BW) (p = 0.018). In female athletes, CC had higher left quadriceps strength relative to body weight (261.36 ± 39.17%BW) compared to LA (221.73 ± 21.56%BW) (p = 0.011), and right quadriceps strength relative to body weight (263.77 ± 39.53%BW) compared to LA (226.84 ± 21.42%BW) (p = 0.037). The analysis of anaerobic power showed that male CC had higher peak power (9.69 ± 0.56 watts/kg) and average power (7.66 ± 0.37 watts/kg) compared to LA (6.46 ± 1.96 watts/kg, 5.15 ± 1.37 watts/kg) (p = 0.041, p = 0.031). There were no significant differences in fatigue index between the two groups. In female athletes, CC had higher average power (4.55 ± 0.17 watts/kg) compared to LA (3.82 ± 0.42 watts/kg) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results of the study indicate that the strength of CC is relatively higher in both upper and lower body strength compared to LA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054336.34134.4b
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Body Strength Between Cross Country Skiers And Long Distance Track And Field Athletes

Seoungki Kang, Kim Tae Hoon, Park Ji Hoon, Park Woo Suk et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Comparison Of Body Strength Between Cross Country Skiers And Long Distance Track And Field Athletes

Seoungki Kang, Kim Tae Hoon, Park Ji Hoon, Park Woo Suk, H Bo Seul, Hong Sung Bong, Suk Jin Su, Jung Yeon Sung, Lee Hye Su
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is comparing the upper and lower body strength of cross country skiers(CC) with long distance track and field athletes(LA). METHODS: The study included 18 adult cross country skiers, 22 long distance athletes. The participants were measured for upper and lower limb muscular strength, and anaerobic power. The collected data were organized using Windows SPSS 26.0, and descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests. RESULTS: The results of the CC average grip strength for the left, right hands (41.35 ± 4.58, 41.70 ± 4.64, 41.53 ± 4.51 kg) was significantly higher than that of LA (27.73 ± 3.66, 31.07 ± 4.82, 29.40 ± 4.21) (p < .05). The back strength was also higher in CC (117.20 ± 9.08 kg) compared to LA (79.21 ± 17.65 kg) (p < .001). But power was higher in CC in vertical, long jumps (p < .05). In female athletes, CC showed higher strength in the left (26.35 ± 3.53 kg), right (28.85 ± 1.55 kg) hands, average grip strength (27.60 ± 1.33 kg), and back strength (76.63 ± 7.94 kg) compared to LA (p < .05). There were no significant differences in muscular endurance for sit ups, but in push ups, CC performed more repetitions (57.75 ± 6.80) compared to LA (45.43 ± 5.80) (p = 0.011). Power, measured by vertical, long jumps, was also higher in female CC (p < .05). The analysis of isokinetic strength differences in both male and female athletes showed that male CC had higher left quadriceps strength relative to body weight (299.50 ± 39.79%BW) compared to LA (246.81 ± 47.66%BW) (p = 0.018). In female athletes, CC had higher left quadriceps strength relative to body weight (261.36 ± 39.17%BW) compared to LA (221.73 ± 21.56%BW) (p = 0.011), and right quadriceps strength relative to body weight (263.77 ± 39.53%BW) compared to LA (226.84 ± 21.42%BW) (p = 0.037). The analysis of anaerobic power showed that male CC had higher peak power (9.69 ± 0.56 watts/kg) and average power (7.66 ± 0.37 watts/kg) compared to LA (6.46 ± 1.96 watts/kg, 5.15 ± 1.37 watts/kg) (p = 0.041, p = 0.031). There were no significant differences in fatigue index between the two groups. In female athletes, CC had higher average power (4.55 ± 0.17 watts/kg) compared to LA (3.82 ± 0.42 watts/kg) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results of the study indicate that the strength of CC is relatively higher in both upper and lower body strength compared to LA.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Yong In University (KR), Songwon University (KR), Gyeonggi Research Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.