The Impact Of Structural Firefighting Gloves, Hand Anthropometrics, And Fatigued Conditions On Grip Strength

Adequate handgrip strength in firefighters is needed to perform complex motor tasks such as holding a tool. Upper limb injuries accounted for 17% of total US firefighter injuries during a 12-month period (2016 National Fire Protection Association). Excessive muscle fatigue from lack of grip strength may disrupt firefighters’ attention, increasing risk of injury at the fireground. PURPOSE: Determining the impact of wearing a firefighting specific glove and hand anthropometrics on grip strength. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy college aged (age: 20.6 ± 2.3) students had 4 anthropometric variables of both hands measured: hand length, middle finger length, hand width, and wrist thickness. Participants squeezed the digital hand dynamometer with maximal effort for three seconds before releasing tension for peak force measurement. Two trials were taken from each hand for each condition (structural firefighting glove, no glove, structural firefighting glove with fatigue) alternating hands between measurements. Order of testing, glove and no glove, was randomized. The glove with fatigue condition consisted of a 60 sec maximum contraction. RESULTS: Peak force production decreased with glove usage by 26% in the right and 27% in the left, resulting in a significant difference of force production between ungloved and gloved in both hands (p = .001). With the fatigue condition, the mean 60 sec force decay of the right was 50.3% and the left was 48.3%, demonstrating significant differences between the initial and final grip strength (p = .001). The anthropometric variables with the strongest correlation coefficients were hand width, specifically the right hand (r = .636, p < .001; r = .755, p < .001; r = .773, p < .001; r = .486, p = .016) for right hand peak, right hand peak with glove, right hand fatigue initial and right-hand fatigue final respectively. The right-hand width and left-hand width were significantly different (r = 0.926, p = .016), the only anthropometric showing significant differences between the left and right. CONCLUSION: Structural firefighter gloves and fatigue significantly impede grip strength while hand width demonstrated an indicator of grip strength. Fire departments may consider using hand anthropometrics to evaluate candidates’ handgrip strength potential. Tulsa Undergraduate Research Challenge

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060176.18098.75
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact Of Structural Firefighting Gloves, Hand Anthropometrics, And Fatigued Conditions On Grip Strength

Roger O. Kollock, Davis Hale, Augustin Au, Tre Damon
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

The Impact Of Structural Firefighting Gloves, Hand Anthropometrics, And Fatigued Conditions On Grip Strength

Roger O. Kollock, Davis Hale, Augustin Au, Tre Damon
article en

Abstract

Adequate handgrip strength in firefighters is needed to perform complex motor tasks such as holding a tool. Upper limb injuries accounted for 17% of total US firefighter injuries during a 12-month period (2016 National Fire Protection Association). Excessive muscle fatigue from lack of grip strength may disrupt firefighters’ attention, increasing risk of injury at the fireground. PURPOSE: Determining the impact of wearing a firefighting specific glove and hand anthropometrics on grip strength. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy college aged (age: 20.6 ± 2.3) students had 4 anthropometric variables of both hands measured: hand length, middle finger length, hand width, and wrist thickness. Participants squeezed the digital hand dynamometer with maximal effort for three seconds before releasing tension for peak force measurement. Two trials were taken from each hand for each condition (structural firefighting glove, no glove, structural firefighting glove with fatigue) alternating hands between measurements. Order of testing, glove and no glove, was randomized. The glove with fatigue condition consisted of a 60 sec maximum contraction. RESULTS: Peak force production decreased with glove usage by 26% in the right and 27% in the left, resulting in a significant difference of force production between ungloved and gloved in both hands (p = .001). With the fatigue condition, the mean 60 sec force decay of the right was 50.3% and the left was 48.3%, demonstrating significant differences between the initial and final grip strength (p = .001). The anthropometric variables with the strongest correlation coefficients were hand width, specifically the right hand (r = .636, p < .001; r = .755, p < .001; r = .773, p < .001; r = .486, p = .016) for right hand peak, right hand peak with glove, right hand fatigue initial and right-hand fatigue final respectively. The right-hand width and left-hand width were significantly different (r = 0.926, p = .016), the only anthropometric showing significant differences between the left and right. CONCLUSION: Structural firefighter gloves and fatigue significantly impede grip strength while hand width demonstrated an indicator of grip strength. Fire departments may consider using hand anthropometrics to evaluate candidates’ handgrip strength potential. Tulsa Undergraduate Research Challenge

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Tulsa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.