Influence Of Meal Timing On Glycemic Variability In Mid-life Adults On A Controlled Diet

Advancing age is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Habitual diet and physical activity are key modulators of 24-hour glucose control and glycemic variability (GV), which are associated with insulin resistance and T2D development. Later meal times are associated with increased blood glucose concentrations and T2D risk, yet this has not been studied in mid-life adults within the context of a controlled diet. Determining optimal meal timing may be an effective strategy to control GV and prevent T2D development in at-risk individuals. PURPOSE: To explore the effect of meal timing on 24-hour glucose control and GV in mid-life adults. METHODS: Sedentary-to-recreationally active adults (n = 6, 4F/2M; age = 54 + 8 years; BMI = 25 + 5 kg/m2) were provided with a eucaloric controlled diet (50% carbohydrate, 35% fat, 15% protein) with a consistent added sugar and fiber content for 14 days. Participants were instructed to consume their meals consistently at their usual meal times. During days 8-14, participants wore a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and recorded meal times using daily logs. Mean 24-hour glucose and Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE) were assessed with CGM. Participants were classified as early eaters (EE, last meal prior to 8 pm, n = 3) or late eaters (LE, last meal after 8 pm, n = 3). Mann Whitney U tests were used to evaluate group differences in CGM outcomes. RESULTS: There were no group differences in 24-hr glucose (EE = 94.0 + 10.6 mg/dL; LE = 99.4 + 3.0 mg/dL) between EE and LE (U = 5.00, p = 1.00). Further, there were no group differences in MAGE (EE = 38.1 + 5.4 mg/dL; LE = 51.6 + 16.6 mg/dL) between EE and LE (U = 7.00, p = 0.40). However, the effect size (Cohen’s d) was d = 1.1, indicating a large effect. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings could be used to determine sample sizes needed for larger-scale studies designed to evaluate the impact of meal timing on glucose control and GV in mid-life adults. Supported by NIH R21AG077143 & R21AG075930

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053992.05623.7e
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence Of Meal Timing On Glycemic Variability In Mid-life Adults On A Controlled Diet

Bailey T. Capra, Elaina L. Marinik, Brenda M. Davy, Eleni Laskaridou et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Influence Of Meal Timing On Glycemic Variability In Mid-life Adults On A Controlled Diet

Bailey T. Capra, Elaina L. Marinik, Brenda M. Davy, Eleni Laskaridou, Summer Hudson, Aubrey L. Johnson, Kevin P. Davy
article en

Abstract

Advancing age is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Habitual diet and physical activity are key modulators of 24-hour glucose control and glycemic variability (GV), which are associated with insulin resistance and T2D development. Later meal times are associated with increased blood glucose concentrations and T2D risk, yet this has not been studied in mid-life adults within the context of a controlled diet. Determining optimal meal timing may be an effective strategy to control GV and prevent T2D development in at-risk individuals. PURPOSE: To explore the effect of meal timing on 24-hour glucose control and GV in mid-life adults. METHODS: Sedentary-to-recreationally active adults (n = 6, 4F/2M; age = 54 + 8 years; BMI = 25 + 5 kg/m2) were provided with a eucaloric controlled diet (50% carbohydrate, 35% fat, 15% protein) with a consistent added sugar and fiber content for 14 days. Participants were instructed to consume their meals consistently at their usual meal times. During days 8-14, participants wore a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and recorded meal times using daily logs. Mean 24-hour glucose and Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE) were assessed with CGM. Participants were classified as early eaters (EE, last meal prior to 8 pm, n = 3) or late eaters (LE, last meal after 8 pm, n = 3). Mann Whitney U tests were used to evaluate group differences in CGM outcomes. RESULTS: There were no group differences in 24-hr glucose (EE = 94.0 + 10.6 mg/dL; LE = 99.4 + 3.0 mg/dL) between EE and LE (U = 5.00, p = 1.00). Further, there were no group differences in MAGE (EE = 38.1 + 5.4 mg/dL; LE = 51.6 + 16.6 mg/dL) between EE and LE (U = 7.00, p = 0.40). However, the effect size (Cohen’s d) was d = 1.1, indicating a large effect. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings could be used to determine sample sizes needed for larger-scale studies designed to evaluate the impact of meal timing on glucose control and GV in mid-life adults. Supported by NIH R21AG077143 & R21AG075930

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Virginia Tech (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.