Effects Of Moderate Vs High Intensity Workstation Training On Functional Performance, A Pilot Study

Prolonged sitting in an office environment contributes to sedentary time which is negatively associated with functional performance. Active workstations (i.e. desk ellipticals), can increase physical activity to ameliorate the negative consequences of sedentary time. Reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) is associated with similar benefits as moderate continuous training (MCT), but their effect on functional outcomes in an active workday intervention has not been determined. PURPOSE: This pilot study evaluated whether REHIT or MCT active workday interventions improve functional performance. METHODS: Sedentary office workers followed an 8-week intervention (3 bouts of 10 min of activity at least 4 days/week) of a MCT (n = 9) protocol (10 min moderate continuous exercise) or REHIT (n = 10) protocol (3 min warm up, 20 sec maximal effort, 3 min active recovery, 20 sec maximal effort, 3 minute cool down). Pre and post measures included functional assessments [6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG)]. Subgroups wore an ActivPal thigh monitor to measure changes in step count and sedentary time during work hours (9 am-5 pm). Comparisons were made using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (Group X Time) for all main outcome variables. All data reported Mean ± SD. RESULTS: There were no differences in 6MWT (m) [MCT pre 481 ± 89 vs. post 521 ± 86; REHIT pre 459 ± 107 vs. post 498 ± 88 ] nor TUG (s) [MCT pre 7.7 ± 1.2 vs. post 7.1 ± 1.3; REHIT pre 8.3 ± 1.9 vs. post 7.3 ± 1.7] (all, p > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis (MCT n = 7, REHIT n = 5), neither step count [MCT pre 2953 ± 2013 vs. post 2736 ± 1846; REHIT pre 1885 ± 1029 vs. post 3041 ± 1729] nor sedentary time (s) [MCT pre 14583 ± 6701 vs. post 18238 ± 6528; REHIT pre 15825 ± 9103 vs. post 19982 ± 4053] (all, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, neither a REHIT nor MCT protocol using desk ellipticals improved functional outcomes, step count, or sedentary behavior in sedentary office workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001059200.80552.2f
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Moderate Vs High Intensity Workstation Training On Functional Performance, A Pilot Study

David Donley, Lori Sherlock, Brian K. Leary, Miriam Leary et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Effects Of Moderate Vs High Intensity Workstation Training On Functional Performance, A Pilot Study

David Donley, Lori Sherlock, Brian K. Leary, Miriam Leary, Emily Ryan, Georgia White, Savannah Kincaid, Jennifer Alvis, L. S. Daniels
article en

Abstract

Prolonged sitting in an office environment contributes to sedentary time which is negatively associated with functional performance. Active workstations (i.e. desk ellipticals), can increase physical activity to ameliorate the negative consequences of sedentary time. Reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training (REHIT) is associated with similar benefits as moderate continuous training (MCT), but their effect on functional outcomes in an active workday intervention has not been determined. PURPOSE: This pilot study evaluated whether REHIT or MCT active workday interventions improve functional performance. METHODS: Sedentary office workers followed an 8-week intervention (3 bouts of 10 min of activity at least 4 days/week) of a MCT (n = 9) protocol (10 min moderate continuous exercise) or REHIT (n = 10) protocol (3 min warm up, 20 sec maximal effort, 3 min active recovery, 20 sec maximal effort, 3 minute cool down). Pre and post measures included functional assessments [6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG)]. Subgroups wore an ActivPal thigh monitor to measure changes in step count and sedentary time during work hours (9 am-5 pm). Comparisons were made using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (Group X Time) for all main outcome variables. All data reported Mean ± SD. RESULTS: There were no differences in 6MWT (m) [MCT pre 481 ± 89 vs. post 521 ± 86; REHIT pre 459 ± 107 vs. post 498 ± 88 ] nor TUG (s) [MCT pre 7.7 ± 1.2 vs. post 7.1 ± 1.3; REHIT pre 8.3 ± 1.9 vs. post 7.3 ± 1.7] (all, p > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis (MCT n = 7, REHIT n = 5), neither step count [MCT pre 2953 ± 2013 vs. post 2736 ± 1846; REHIT pre 1885 ± 1029 vs. post 3041 ± 1729] nor sedentary time (s) [MCT pre 14583 ± 6701 vs. post 18238 ± 6528; REHIT pre 15825 ± 9103 vs. post 19982 ± 4053] (all, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, neither a REHIT nor MCT protocol using desk ellipticals improved functional outcomes, step count, or sedentary behavior in sedentary office workers.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
West Virginia University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.