Muscular Power Dynamics Of Elite Cheerleaders Throughout Practice

Countermovement jumps (CMJ) reflect neuromuscular function by examining jump height (JH) and rate of power development (RPD). There is limited evidence about power production and its relationship to fatigue in competitive cheerleaders. PURPOSE: To examine JH and RPD among elite male and female cheerleaders a week prior to the World Championship. METHODS: Sixteen participants [26.4 ± 3.4 y.o.; men (M; n = 5); females (F; n = 11)] from the All Girls and Coed German National Cheerleading teams performed three CMJ on Accupower Force Plates before practice (T1), after a warm-up (T2), after a simulated competition routine (T3) and after practice (T4). All CMJ were performed with the hands-on the hips, while a three second countdown cued the athlete to jump. A ten second break between each CMJ was provided. To examine the changes of average JH and RPD, separate repeated two-way (time*sex) ANOVA’s were performed with a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Main effects were found on sex and time for JH and RPD (JH: p = 0.011; p = 0.02, respectively; RPD: p = 0.0005; p = 0.0008, respectively). On average, men jumped higher and displayed higher RPD than females (M; JH: 37.7 cm ± 1.97; RPD: 28485 ± 2215.74 W/s vs. F: JH: 30.9 ± 1.33 cm; RPD: 16697 ± 1493.85 W/s). From T1 to T2, both sexes increased JH by an average of 4.8 cm (31.14 ± 1.61 cm to 35.99 ± 1.61 cm; p = 0.0144). However, no significant results were found for the other time periods. RPD significantly increased from T1 to T2 by an average of 2255.02 W/s in both sexes (21598 ± 1475.61 W/s to 23853 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.042). From T2 to T4 both sexes trended to decrease RPD by an average of 2932.27 W/s (23853 ± 1475.61 W/s to 23853 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.058). Additionally, from T3 to T4, RPD significantly decreased by an average of 3071.57 W/s among both sexes (23992 ± 1475.61 W/s to 20920 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.0029). CONCLUSION: Both sexes increased JH from T1 to T2 and maintained JH throughout T3 and T4. Additionally, both sexes increased their RPD from T1 to T2 but decreased at T3 and T4, therefore, RPD was more sensitive for detecting fatigue in cheerleaders before the World Championship. Future research should examine whether RPD relates to the quality of the movement assessed by Competitive Cheerleading scoring scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054300.79155.ec
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muscular Power Dynamics Of Elite Cheerleaders Throughout Practice

Nauris Tamulevicius, Simon Gavanda, Martín Lange, Travis M. Foster et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Muscular Power Dynamics Of Elite Cheerleaders Throughout Practice

Nauris Tamulevicius, Simon Gavanda, Martín Lange, Travis M. Foster, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Sean M. Lubiak, Saida Riddell
article en

Abstract

Countermovement jumps (CMJ) reflect neuromuscular function by examining jump height (JH) and rate of power development (RPD). There is limited evidence about power production and its relationship to fatigue in competitive cheerleaders. PURPOSE: To examine JH and RPD among elite male and female cheerleaders a week prior to the World Championship. METHODS: Sixteen participants [26.4 ± 3.4 y.o.; men (M; n = 5); females (F; n = 11)] from the All Girls and Coed German National Cheerleading teams performed three CMJ on Accupower Force Plates before practice (T1), after a warm-up (T2), after a simulated competition routine (T3) and after practice (T4). All CMJ were performed with the hands-on the hips, while a three second countdown cued the athlete to jump. A ten second break between each CMJ was provided. To examine the changes of average JH and RPD, separate repeated two-way (time*sex) ANOVA’s were performed with a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Main effects were found on sex and time for JH and RPD (JH: p = 0.011; p = 0.02, respectively; RPD: p = 0.0005; p = 0.0008, respectively). On average, men jumped higher and displayed higher RPD than females (M; JH: 37.7 cm ± 1.97; RPD: 28485 ± 2215.74 W/s vs. F: JH: 30.9 ± 1.33 cm; RPD: 16697 ± 1493.85 W/s). From T1 to T2, both sexes increased JH by an average of 4.8 cm (31.14 ± 1.61 cm to 35.99 ± 1.61 cm; p = 0.0144). However, no significant results were found for the other time periods. RPD significantly increased from T1 to T2 by an average of 2255.02 W/s in both sexes (21598 ± 1475.61 W/s to 23853 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.042). From T2 to T4 both sexes trended to decrease RPD by an average of 2932.27 W/s (23853 ± 1475.61 W/s to 23853 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.058). Additionally, from T3 to T4, RPD significantly decreased by an average of 3071.57 W/s among both sexes (23992 ± 1475.61 W/s to 20920 ± 1475.61 W/s; p = 0.0029). CONCLUSION: Both sexes increased JH from T1 to T2 and maintained JH throughout T3 and T4. Additionally, both sexes increased their RPD from T1 to T2 but decreased at T3 and T4, therefore, RPD was more sensitive for detecting fatigue in cheerleaders before the World Championship. Future research should examine whether RPD relates to the quality of the movement assessed by Competitive Cheerleading scoring scales.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Central Florida (US), Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.