EFFECTS OF CLEAR AND TINTED FOOTBALL VISORS ON AGILITY AND FUNCTIONAL REACTIVE ABILITY IN NCAA FOOTBALL PLAYERS

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify how clear and tinted visors influence agility and functional reactive ability in NCAA football players. METHODS: Division 1 NCAA football players with normal/corrected to normal vision participated. In a randomized manner, participants completed reactive tests for the following conditions: Baseline/no helmet (BL), Helmet + Clear visor (HCV), Helmet + Smoke tinted visor (HSV), Helmet + Mirrored visor (HMV). For each condition, participants completed two reactive tests using a FITLIGHT trainer system: reactive reach test (RRT) and reactive step test (RST). For the RRT, 5 poles equipped with a total of 10 LED sensors were placed in a semi-circle 1 meter around a center point. Participants were asked to step and reach to hit 10 lights with their hands as fast as possible. For the RST, 5 LED sensors were place on the ground in a semi-circle pattern 1 meter around a center point. Participants were asked to step and hit each sensor with their foot to hit 5 lights as fast as possible. Each reactive test was repeated for a total of 3 attempts. Average reaction time and time to test completion (TTC) were analyzed and compared between visor conditions. RESULTS: HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions resulted in slower reaction time during RRT compared to BL. TTC was significantly increased during the HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions versus BL. However, no differences existed between visor conditions (p > 0.05). For the RST, reaction time was slower during HCV (p = 0.028), HSV (p = 0.038), and HMV (p = 0.017) conditions versus BL. TTC was significantly higher during the HCV (p = 0.010), HSV (p = 0.009), and HMV (p = 0.007) versus BL. No differences existed between facemask conditions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of visor condition, wearing a football helmet impaired functional reactive ability and agility performance. However, visor tint did not exacerbate functional reactive ability. These findings highlight the need for new helmet designs which may not obstruct lines of sight to maintain player safety and performance in collegiate football players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054212.52384.9b
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF CLEAR AND TINTED FOOTBALL VISORS ON AGILITY AND FUNCTIONAL REACTIVE ABILITY IN NCAA FOOTBALL PLAYERS

Christopher G. Ballmann, Rebecca R. Rogers
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

EFFECTS OF CLEAR AND TINTED FOOTBALL VISORS ON AGILITY AND FUNCTIONAL REACTIVE ABILITY IN NCAA FOOTBALL PLAYERS

Christopher G. Ballmann, Rebecca R. Rogers
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify how clear and tinted visors influence agility and functional reactive ability in NCAA football players. METHODS: Division 1 NCAA football players with normal/corrected to normal vision participated. In a randomized manner, participants completed reactive tests for the following conditions: Baseline/no helmet (BL), Helmet + Clear visor (HCV), Helmet + Smoke tinted visor (HSV), Helmet + Mirrored visor (HMV). For each condition, participants completed two reactive tests using a FITLIGHT trainer system: reactive reach test (RRT) and reactive step test (RST). For the RRT, 5 poles equipped with a total of 10 LED sensors were placed in a semi-circle 1 meter around a center point. Participants were asked to step and reach to hit 10 lights with their hands as fast as possible. For the RST, 5 LED sensors were place on the ground in a semi-circle pattern 1 meter around a center point. Participants were asked to step and hit each sensor with their foot to hit 5 lights as fast as possible. Each reactive test was repeated for a total of 3 attempts. Average reaction time and time to test completion (TTC) were analyzed and compared between visor conditions. RESULTS: HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions resulted in slower reaction time during RRT compared to BL. TTC was significantly increased during the HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions versus BL. However, no differences existed between visor conditions (p > 0.05). For the RST, reaction time was slower during HCV (p = 0.028), HSV (p = 0.038), and HMV (p = 0.017) conditions versus BL. TTC was significantly higher during the HCV (p = 0.010), HSV (p = 0.009), and HMV (p = 0.007) versus BL. No differences existed between facemask conditions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of visor condition, wearing a football helmet impaired functional reactive ability and agility performance. However, visor tint did not exacerbate functional reactive ability. These findings highlight the need for new helmet designs which may not obstruct lines of sight to maintain player safety and performance in collegiate football players.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.