Sex Differences In Proportional Numbers Of Top Performances Within Elite Youth Track And Field Athletes

There is a small but consistent sex difference (~5%) in track running performance in that boys outperform girls prior to puberty in elite youth track and field athletes. Whether the proportional number of males and females differ among top elite youth performances remains unknown. PURPOSE: To determine among elite youth track athletes 1) the proportional number of males vs. females and 2) at what age (between 5 and 18 years) females are no longer represented, within the overall top running performances. METHODS: Top age group running performance records of elite USA male and female track and field athletes (5-18 years) over a ten-year period (2009-2019) were collected from an online database (athletic.net). The top 10 and top 100 performances were recorded for four running events: 100 m, 200 m, 400 m, and 800 m. Data are reported in mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Between 5-6 years, the proportion of males (M) was greater than females (F) in the top 10 (M = 6.3 ± 1.4, range: 4-8 (# of males that placed in the top 10); F = 3.8 ± 1.4, range: 2-6 (# of females that placed in the top 10); χ2 = 10, p = 0.002) and top 100 (M = 59.4 ± 13.0, range: 30-74; F = 36.0 ± 5.4, range: 26-44; χ2 = 92, p < 0.001), across all four events. Between 7-12 years, there was a greater proportion of males than females in the top 10 (M = 8.9 ± 0.9, range: 7-10; F = 1.1 ± 0.9, range: 0-3; χ2 = 295, p < 0.001) and top 100 (M = 80.7 ± 5.5, range: 69-88; F = 19.3 ± 5.5, range: 12-31; χ2 = 1811, p < 0.001), across all four events. Additionally, between 13-18 years, there was a greater proportion of males than females in the top 10 (M = 10.0 ± 0.0, range: 10; F = 0.0 ± 0.0, range: 0) and top 100 (M = 99.5 ± 1.1, range: 96-100; F = 0.46 ± 1.10, range: 0-4; χ2 = 4712, p < 0.001), across all four events. Females were no longer represented within the top 10 overall performances starting at 13 years in the 100 m and 200 m, 12 years in the 400 m, and after 10 years in the 800 m. Females were no longer represented within the top 100 overall performances starting at 14 years in all four events. CONCLUSION: Prior to puberty in elite youth track and field athletes, there is a greater proportion of males within the top 10 and top 100 overall running performances. Between ages 5-6 years, the sex difference in the proportion of top running performances is small, but present, and increased between ages 7-12 years, with no females represented after 13 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054384.86194.00
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences In Proportional Numbers Of Top Performances Within Elite Youth Track And Field Athletes

Sandra K. Hunter, Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Jessica J. James, Jonathon W. Senefeld et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Sex Differences In Proportional Numbers Of Top Performances Within Elite Youth Track And Field Athletes

Sandra K. Hunter, Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Jessica J. James, Jonathon W. Senefeld, Michael J. Joyner, Elizabeth P. Bueckers
article en

Abstract

There is a small but consistent sex difference (~5%) in track running performance in that boys outperform girls prior to puberty in elite youth track and field athletes. Whether the proportional number of males and females differ among top elite youth performances remains unknown. PURPOSE: To determine among elite youth track athletes 1) the proportional number of males vs. females and 2) at what age (between 5 and 18 years) females are no longer represented, within the overall top running performances. METHODS: Top age group running performance records of elite USA male and female track and field athletes (5-18 years) over a ten-year period (2009-2019) were collected from an online database (athletic.net). The top 10 and top 100 performances were recorded for four running events: 100 m, 200 m, 400 m, and 800 m. Data are reported in mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Between 5-6 years, the proportion of males (M) was greater than females (F) in the top 10 (M = 6.3 ± 1.4, range: 4-8 (# of males that placed in the top 10); F = 3.8 ± 1.4, range: 2-6 (# of females that placed in the top 10); χ2 = 10, p = 0.002) and top 100 (M = 59.4 ± 13.0, range: 30-74; F = 36.0 ± 5.4, range: 26-44; χ2 = 92, p < 0.001), across all four events. Between 7-12 years, there was a greater proportion of males than females in the top 10 (M = 8.9 ± 0.9, range: 7-10; F = 1.1 ± 0.9, range: 0-3; χ2 = 295, p < 0.001) and top 100 (M = 80.7 ± 5.5, range: 69-88; F = 19.3 ± 5.5, range: 12-31; χ2 = 1811, p < 0.001), across all four events. Additionally, between 13-18 years, there was a greater proportion of males than females in the top 10 (M = 10.0 ± 0.0, range: 10; F = 0.0 ± 0.0, range: 0) and top 100 (M = 99.5 ± 1.1, range: 96-100; F = 0.46 ± 1.10, range: 0-4; χ2 = 4712, p < 0.001), across all four events. Females were no longer represented within the top 10 overall performances starting at 13 years in the 100 m and 200 m, 12 years in the 400 m, and after 10 years in the 800 m. Females were no longer represented within the top 100 overall performances starting at 14 years in all four events. CONCLUSION: Prior to puberty in elite youth track and field athletes, there is a greater proportion of males within the top 10 and top 100 overall running performances. Between ages 5-6 years, the sex difference in the proportion of top running performances is small, but present, and increased between ages 7-12 years, with no females represented after 13 years.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Marquette University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Duke University (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.