Different Neuromuscular Control Strategies In Dominant And Non-dominant Handwriting

PURPOSE: Writing with the non-dominant hand or without visibility can impact text legibility. This study investigates muscle activation and handwriting features under various sensory conditions, to uncover neuromuscular control strategies in handwriting. METHODS: Twelve right-handed graduate students (6 M, 6 F, 27.2 ± 2.4 yrs old) completed 4 handwriting tasks using dominant and non-dominant hands, with eyes open or closed. They wrote each of the 5 isolated letters and 3 words with a single stroke, repeating each randomly 8 times. Writing metrics, including time, length, speed, and pen pressure, were recorded using a graphic tablet. Electromyographic signals from 12 muscles across both arms, including abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), anterior deltoid muscle (ADM), and upper trapezius (UT), were measured using surface electromyography (Fig. 1). The root mean square (RMS) was used to quantify the muscle activity. RESULTS: Fig. 1 below shows the non-dominant hand increased time and length (t = 7.866, p < 0.0001; t = 10.691, p < 0.0001, respectively), while reducing pen pressure (t = -4.417, p = 0.0001). The closed eyes reduced time (t = -3.640, p = 0.0009), while enhancing length and speed (t = 4.250, p = 0.0002; t = 3.978, p < 0.0004, respectively). The RMS amplitude decreased for FDI, ECR, and FCU muscles on the non-dominant side (t = -2.977, p = 0.0054; t = -2.503, p = 0.0174; t = -4.783, p < 0.0001, respectively), while it increased for ADM (t = 5.954, p < 0.0001). No significant interaction effects were found in any of the indicators (all, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Visual and hand-use independently influence various features in handwriting. Different muscle activation strategies exist between bilateral hands, with increased activation of proximal limb muscles when using the non-dominant hand, which may serve as a compensatory mechanism to maintain the clarity and accuracy of handwriting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054716.41864.b9
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different Neuromuscular Control Strategies In Dominant And Non-dominant Handwriting

Naotsugu Kaneko, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Ryogo Takahashi, Inhyeok Jeong et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Different Neuromuscular Control Strategies In Dominant And Non-dominant Handwriting

Naotsugu Kaneko, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Ryogo Takahashi, Inhyeok Jeong, Bowen Liu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Writing with the non-dominant hand or without visibility can impact text legibility. This study investigates muscle activation and handwriting features under various sensory conditions, to uncover neuromuscular control strategies in handwriting. METHODS: Twelve right-handed graduate students (6 M, 6 F, 27.2 ± 2.4 yrs old) completed 4 handwriting tasks using dominant and non-dominant hands, with eyes open or closed. They wrote each of the 5 isolated letters and 3 words with a single stroke, repeating each randomly 8 times. Writing metrics, including time, length, speed, and pen pressure, were recorded using a graphic tablet. Electromyographic signals from 12 muscles across both arms, including abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), anterior deltoid muscle (ADM), and upper trapezius (UT), were measured using surface electromyography (Fig. 1). The root mean square (RMS) was used to quantify the muscle activity. RESULTS: Fig. 1 below shows the non-dominant hand increased time and length (t = 7.866, p < 0.0001; t = 10.691, p < 0.0001, respectively), while reducing pen pressure (t = -4.417, p = 0.0001). The closed eyes reduced time (t = -3.640, p = 0.0009), while enhancing length and speed (t = 4.250, p = 0.0002; t = 3.978, p < 0.0004, respectively). The RMS amplitude decreased for FDI, ECR, and FCU muscles on the non-dominant side (t = -2.977, p = 0.0054; t = -2.503, p = 0.0174; t = -4.783, p < 0.0001, respectively), while it increased for ADM (t = 5.954, p < 0.0001). No significant interaction effects were found in any of the indicators (all, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Visual and hand-use independently influence various features in handwriting. Different muscle activation strategies exist between bilateral hands, with increased activation of proximal limb muscles when using the non-dominant hand, which may serve as a compensatory mechanism to maintain the clarity and accuracy of handwriting.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.