Impact Of Biological Maturation On Swedish Ice Hockey Players - Implications For Junior And Adult Success

Ice hockey is a physically demanding sport. Hence, players who mature early are more likely to be successful in junior years. This has already been shown in sports such as soccer, and the maturation bias increases at the elite level. However, no previous studies have investigated the effect of maturation and its relationship with junior selection and adult success in ice hockey. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between biological maturation and ice hockey success during adolescence and adulthood assessed using selection to junior national teams and the National Hockey League (NHL), respectively. METHODS: Data was obtained from anthropometric records of players from ice hockey schools certified by the Swedish ice hockey association between 1998 and 2017 (n = 4787). Moreover, status of participation in junior national teams, i.e., under-16, -18, -20, and NHL appearances were collected from other sources. Biological maturation was computed as percentage of adult height (%AH), and biological age was calculated by comparison with a Swedish growth reference dataset. Categories of %AH, standard deviation z-scores, and biological age offset describing early, on-time, and late maturation were created. RESULTS: Of 2211 players with maturation data, 217 players had played on the U16 national team (junior success) and 96 reached the NHL (adult success). The difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in baseline %AH between players with junior vs. adult success was -0.75 (-0.39, -1.11). Looking at age-offset categories in junior success, 30% of players were early maturing and 19% of players were late-maturing, showing a bias towards early maturation (p < 0.01). In contrast, more late-maturing players (40%) achieved adult success than early maturing players (25%), and NHL players displayed significantly later maturation (%AH: -0.48 [-0.80, -0.16]) than non-NHL players. CONCLUSIONS: This unique 20-year analysis shows that junior success in male ice hockey is positively related to early maturation, while adult success is inversely related to advanced maturation. Ice hockey organizations should implement maturation assessments to optimize the development of both late and early maturing players and reduce the risk of neglecting late maturing players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054344.95708.51
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Of Biological Maturation On Swedish Ice Hockey Players - Implications For Junior And Adult Success

Marlene Rietz, Erik Niklasson, David M. Johnson, Tommy R. Lundberg et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Impact Of Biological Maturation On Swedish Ice Hockey Players - Implications For Junior And Adult Success

Marlene Rietz, Erik Niklasson, David M. Johnson, Tommy R. Lundberg, Oliver Lindholm, John Lind
article en

Abstract

Ice hockey is a physically demanding sport. Hence, players who mature early are more likely to be successful in junior years. This has already been shown in sports such as soccer, and the maturation bias increases at the elite level. However, no previous studies have investigated the effect of maturation and its relationship with junior selection and adult success in ice hockey. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between biological maturation and ice hockey success during adolescence and adulthood assessed using selection to junior national teams and the National Hockey League (NHL), respectively. METHODS: Data was obtained from anthropometric records of players from ice hockey schools certified by the Swedish ice hockey association between 1998 and 2017 (n = 4787). Moreover, status of participation in junior national teams, i.e., under-16, -18, -20, and NHL appearances were collected from other sources. Biological maturation was computed as percentage of adult height (%AH), and biological age was calculated by comparison with a Swedish growth reference dataset. Categories of %AH, standard deviation z-scores, and biological age offset describing early, on-time, and late maturation were created. RESULTS: Of 2211 players with maturation data, 217 players had played on the U16 national team (junior success) and 96 reached the NHL (adult success). The difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in baseline %AH between players with junior vs. adult success was -0.75 (-0.39, -1.11). Looking at age-offset categories in junior success, 30% of players were early maturing and 19% of players were late-maturing, showing a bias towards early maturation (p < 0.01). In contrast, more late-maturing players (40%) achieved adult success than early maturing players (25%), and NHL players displayed significantly later maturation (%AH: -0.48 [-0.80, -0.16]) than non-NHL players. CONCLUSIONS: This unique 20-year analysis shows that junior success in male ice hockey is positively related to early maturation, while adult success is inversely related to advanced maturation. Ice hockey organizations should implement maturation assessments to optimize the development of both late and early maturing players and reduce the risk of neglecting late maturing players.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.