Comparison Of Physical Fitness Of Ssireum Wrestling And Judo Athletes

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the physical fitness of korean traditional wrestling Ssireum()(SS) wrestling(WR) and judo(JD) athletes in order to provide foundational data for a training program tailored to the physical characteristics of ssireum athletes. METHODS: The study included 15 ssireum , 16 wrestling, and 18 judo athletes selected as adult participants. And Basic physical fitness, isokinetic strength, and anaerobic power were measured. Measurement results were organized and statistical analysis was conducted using Windows SPSS 26.0. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA(3RG) were performed to confirm differences between the sports, and post hoc analysis was used Scheffe's. RESULTS: The result of basic fitness differences, left and right grip strength, SS (57.21 ± 5.93, 60.60 ± 4.73 kg) showed higher values than WR (46.67 ± 4.33, 47.61 ± 5.04 kg) and JD (49.78 ± 8.59, 49.69 ± 8.08 kg) (p < .001). Average grip strength also demonstrated that SS (58.90 ± 5.16 kg) surpassed WR (47.12 ± 4.06 kg) and JD (49.69 ± 8.08 kg) (p < .001). Additionally, SS exhibited the highest abdominal strength (179.82 ± 12.90 kg) compared to WR (155.11 ± 12.29 kg) and JD (155.48 ± 21.83 kg) (p < .001). In push ups, WR (83.00 ± 17.27) outperformed JD (72.70 ± 15.37) and SS (72.70 ± 15.37) (p < .001). Pull ups showed a sequence with WR (67.23 ± 5.66), JD (51.95 ± 9.25), and SS (43.92 ± 7.11) (p < .001). However, coordination showed a significant difference, with JD (48.25 ± 4.42 seconds) having higher scores than SS (43.11 ± 3.35 seconds) (p = 0.002). In the Wingate test for anaerobic power, SS demonstrated higher peak power per body weight (9.62 ± 0.66 watts/kg) compared to JD (8.81 ± 0.87 watts/kg) (p = 0.007). However, JD showed lower average power per body weight (6.60 ± 0.52 watts/kg) compared to SS (7.01 ± 0.34 watts/kg) and WR (7.01 ± 0.40 watts/kg). Fatigue index was highest in SS (60.09 ± 3.97%), followed by WR (54.27 ± 3.65%) and JD (54.93 ± 8.70%). CONCLUSIONS: Muscle strength and abdominal strength were highest in SS, while muscle endurance and coordination were lowest. Based on these characteristics of ssireum, coaches in the field should consider the sport's unique features and implement training plans to enhance upper body strength to achieve higher performance levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054340.83169.c3
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Physical Fitness Of Ssireum Wrestling And Judo Athletes

Kim Tae Hoon, Park Ji Hoon, Park Woo Suk, Hong Sung Bong et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

Comparison Of Physical Fitness Of Ssireum Wrestling And Judo Athletes

Kim Tae Hoon, Park Ji Hoon, Park Woo Suk, Hong Sung Bong, Suk Jin Su, Kang Seoung Ki, Jung Yeon Sung, Lee Hye Su, Boseul Hwang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the physical fitness of korean traditional wrestling Ssireum()(SS) wrestling(WR) and judo(JD) athletes in order to provide foundational data for a training program tailored to the physical characteristics of ssireum athletes. METHODS: The study included 15 ssireum , 16 wrestling, and 18 judo athletes selected as adult participants. And Basic physical fitness, isokinetic strength, and anaerobic power were measured. Measurement results were organized and statistical analysis was conducted using Windows SPSS 26.0. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA(3RG) were performed to confirm differences between the sports, and post hoc analysis was used Scheffe's. RESULTS: The result of basic fitness differences, left and right grip strength, SS (57.21 ± 5.93, 60.60 ± 4.73 kg) showed higher values than WR (46.67 ± 4.33, 47.61 ± 5.04 kg) and JD (49.78 ± 8.59, 49.69 ± 8.08 kg) (p < .001). Average grip strength also demonstrated that SS (58.90 ± 5.16 kg) surpassed WR (47.12 ± 4.06 kg) and JD (49.69 ± 8.08 kg) (p < .001). Additionally, SS exhibited the highest abdominal strength (179.82 ± 12.90 kg) compared to WR (155.11 ± 12.29 kg) and JD (155.48 ± 21.83 kg) (p < .001). In push ups, WR (83.00 ± 17.27) outperformed JD (72.70 ± 15.37) and SS (72.70 ± 15.37) (p < .001). Pull ups showed a sequence with WR (67.23 ± 5.66), JD (51.95 ± 9.25), and SS (43.92 ± 7.11) (p < .001). However, coordination showed a significant difference, with JD (48.25 ± 4.42 seconds) having higher scores than SS (43.11 ± 3.35 seconds) (p = 0.002). In the Wingate test for anaerobic power, SS demonstrated higher peak power per body weight (9.62 ± 0.66 watts/kg) compared to JD (8.81 ± 0.87 watts/kg) (p = 0.007). However, JD showed lower average power per body weight (6.60 ± 0.52 watts/kg) compared to SS (7.01 ± 0.34 watts/kg) and WR (7.01 ± 0.40 watts/kg). Fatigue index was highest in SS (60.09 ± 3.97%), followed by WR (54.27 ± 3.65%) and JD (54.93 ± 8.70%). CONCLUSIONS: Muscle strength and abdominal strength were highest in SS, while muscle endurance and coordination were lowest. Based on these characteristics of ssireum, coaches in the field should consider the sport's unique features and implement training plans to enhance upper body strength to achieve higher performance levels.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Yong In University (KR), Songwon University (KR), Gyeonggi Research Institute (KR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.