Resistance Exercise Training For Depressive Symptoms Compared To Active And Inactive Comparisons: A Meta-analysis

Available evidence supports the antidepressant effects of resistance exercise training (RET) compared to no-treatment comparison conditions. Although promising, the efficacy of RET to reduce depressive symptoms compared to potential active treatments remains unclear. PURPOSE: To estimate the population mean effect from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RET effects on depressive symptoms compared to both inactive and active comparisons, and explore potential sources of heterogeneity. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published before October 2021 were located using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Randomized trials that compared RET to any other comparison group with validated measures of depressive symptoms at baseline, mid-intervention, and/or post-intervention, were included. Hedges’ d effect sizes were computed, and random effects models were used for all analyses. RESULTS: One-hundred and seven effects were derived from 64 RCTs. RET resulted in a small-to-moderate magnitude, heterogeneous improvement in depressive symptoms (Δ = 0.43, 95%CI: [0.33-0.53]; z = 8.53, p < 0.001; Q(106) = 323.79, p < 0.001). Effects of RET were larger compared to inactive comparisons (Δ = 0.59, [0.45-0.74]; z = 8.01, p < 0.001), and were small, but significant, compared to active comparisons (Δ = 0.19, [0.09-0.29]; z = 3.64, p < 0.001). Effects of RET were also larger among females (Δ = 0.50, [0.32-0.68]; z = 5.47, p < 0.001) than males (Δ = 0.26, [-0.02 to 0.54]; z = 1.80, p = 0.074), for RET frequencies of 2-4 d/wk (Δ = 0.41-0.90; all p < 0.001), and for intervention durations of ≤12 weeks (Δ = 0.50-0.55; all p < 0.001). When compared directly, there was no significant difference between the effects of RET and aerobic exercise training (Δ = 0.11, [0.00-0.22]; z = 1.92, p = 0.055) or flexibility training (Δ = 0.42, [-0.03 to 0.88]; z = 1.83, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: RET significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared to active and inactive comparisons. Larger improvements were found among females and for interventions of ≤12 weeks in duration; similar magnitude improvements were found compared to aerobic exercise training and flexibility training. No trial has directly compared the effects of RET to pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy; comparisons to these frontline therapies are warranted in future research. Darragh O'Sullivan is funded by the Irish Research Council under award number GOIPG/2023/4158

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001058720.70886.b8
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance Exercise Training For Depressive Symptoms Compared To Active And Inactive Comparisons: A Meta-analysis

Matthew P. Herring, Darragh O’Sullivan, Jennifer Rice, Mark Lyons et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Resistance Exercise Training For Depressive Symptoms Compared To Active And Inactive Comparisons: A Meta-analysis

Matthew P. Herring, Darragh O’Sullivan, Jennifer Rice, Mark Lyons, Seana L. Perkins, Jacob Daniel Meyer, Ian Sherwin, Cillian P. McDowell, Brett R. Gordon, Mats Hallgren
article en

Abstract

Available evidence supports the antidepressant effects of resistance exercise training (RET) compared to no-treatment comparison conditions. Although promising, the efficacy of RET to reduce depressive symptoms compared to potential active treatments remains unclear. PURPOSE: To estimate the population mean effect from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RET effects on depressive symptoms compared to both inactive and active comparisons, and explore potential sources of heterogeneity. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published before October 2021 were located using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Randomized trials that compared RET to any other comparison group with validated measures of depressive symptoms at baseline, mid-intervention, and/or post-intervention, were included. Hedges’ d effect sizes were computed, and random effects models were used for all analyses. RESULTS: One-hundred and seven effects were derived from 64 RCTs. RET resulted in a small-to-moderate magnitude, heterogeneous improvement in depressive symptoms (Δ = 0.43, 95%CI: [0.33-0.53]; z = 8.53, p < 0.001; Q(106) = 323.79, p < 0.001). Effects of RET were larger compared to inactive comparisons (Δ = 0.59, [0.45-0.74]; z = 8.01, p < 0.001), and were small, but significant, compared to active comparisons (Δ = 0.19, [0.09-0.29]; z = 3.64, p < 0.001). Effects of RET were also larger among females (Δ = 0.50, [0.32-0.68]; z = 5.47, p < 0.001) than males (Δ = 0.26, [-0.02 to 0.54]; z = 1.80, p = 0.074), for RET frequencies of 2-4 d/wk (Δ = 0.41-0.90; all p < 0.001), and for intervention durations of ≤12 weeks (Δ = 0.50-0.55; all p < 0.001). When compared directly, there was no significant difference between the effects of RET and aerobic exercise training (Δ = 0.11, [0.00-0.22]; z = 1.92, p = 0.055) or flexibility training (Δ = 0.42, [-0.03 to 0.88]; z = 1.83, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: RET significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared to active and inactive comparisons. Larger improvements were found among females and for interventions of ≤12 weeks in duration; similar magnitude improvements were found compared to aerobic exercise training and flexibility training. No trial has directly compared the effects of RET to pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy; comparisons to these frontline therapies are warranted in future research. Darragh O'Sullivan is funded by the Irish Research Council under award number GOIPG/2023/4158

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Deakin University (AU), Iowa State University (US), University of Limerick (IE), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.