Impact Of High Sarcopenic Risk In Patients Undergoing Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Procedure

Sarcopenic patients undergoing inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (iCR) after a cardiac procedure face an increased risk of poorer outcomes. Currently, there is no standardized screening for sarcopenia in the iCR setting. PURPOSE: This study aimed to screen iCR participants aged ≥75 for sarcopenia risk and quantify their functional capacity. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study within the framework of the ongoing multicenter prehabilitation study "PRECOVERY". Patients undergoing iCR after a cardiac procedure were recruited from four German iCR facilities. At iCR (baseline), the Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire identified patients with a high risk for sarcopenia. In addition, Katz-Index, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), handgrip strength (HGS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) measured functional capacity and frailty at baseline. Follow-up of SARC-F was performed three months later by telephone. Outcomes were the risk of sarcopenia, the correlation of a high sarcopenic risk to functional capacity at baseline, and the SARC-F score at follow-up. The Wilcoxon test and eta coefficient with one-way ANOVA were applied. RESULTS: Data from 101 patients (79.9 ± 4.0 years; 63% male) were included in the analysis. At baseline, the mean SARC-F score was 2.7 ± 2.1, with 35% scoring ≥4, indicating a high likelihood of sarcopenia. Other baseline results were Katz-Index 5.7 ± 0.9, CFS 3.2 ± 1.4, HGS 24.9 ± 9.9 kg, SPPB score 7.5 ± 3.3 and 6MWD 288.8 ± 136.5 m. Compared to baseline, fewer patients had a risk of sarcopenia (23% compared to 35%) at follow-up. In the subgroup of patients with a high sarcopenic risk at baseline (n = 35), pre post comparison resulted in a significant SARC-F improvement (p = 0.017). A significant positive correlation was found between sarcopenic risk measured by SARC-F and poor results in functional capacity assessments (p < 0.001; r > 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at iCR after cardiac procedure have a high probability of sarcopenia, which remains high during follow-up. Further studies are needed to quantify sarcopenia in iCR patients and to investigate the benefit of a multi-faceted prehabilitation program to improve sarcopenic status and functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001058912.81415.cd
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Of High Sarcopenic Risk In Patients Undergoing Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Procedure

Thomas Mengden, Carolin Steinmetz, Laura Krause, Stephan von Haehling et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Impact Of High Sarcopenic Risk In Patients Undergoing Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Procedure

Thomas Mengden, Carolin Steinmetz, Laura Krause, Stephan von Haehling, Monika Sadlonova, Thomas Schmidt, Stephanie Heinemann, Klara Brixius, Clemens Grefe, Sabrina Kaumkötter, Birna Bjarnason‐Wehrens, Samra Sulejmanovic, Nils Reiss, Ernst Knoglinger, Christina A.F. von Arnim
article en

Abstract

Sarcopenic patients undergoing inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (iCR) after a cardiac procedure face an increased risk of poorer outcomes. Currently, there is no standardized screening for sarcopenia in the iCR setting. PURPOSE: This study aimed to screen iCR participants aged ≥75 for sarcopenia risk and quantify their functional capacity. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study within the framework of the ongoing multicenter prehabilitation study "PRECOVERY". Patients undergoing iCR after a cardiac procedure were recruited from four German iCR facilities. At iCR (baseline), the Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire identified patients with a high risk for sarcopenia. In addition, Katz-Index, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), handgrip strength (HGS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) measured functional capacity and frailty at baseline. Follow-up of SARC-F was performed three months later by telephone. Outcomes were the risk of sarcopenia, the correlation of a high sarcopenic risk to functional capacity at baseline, and the SARC-F score at follow-up. The Wilcoxon test and eta coefficient with one-way ANOVA were applied. RESULTS: Data from 101 patients (79.9 ± 4.0 years; 63% male) were included in the analysis. At baseline, the mean SARC-F score was 2.7 ± 2.1, with 35% scoring ≥4, indicating a high likelihood of sarcopenia. Other baseline results were Katz-Index 5.7 ± 0.9, CFS 3.2 ± 1.4, HGS 24.9 ± 9.9 kg, SPPB score 7.5 ± 3.3 and 6MWD 288.8 ± 136.5 m. Compared to baseline, fewer patients had a risk of sarcopenia (23% compared to 35%) at follow-up. In the subgroup of patients with a high sarcopenic risk at baseline (n = 35), pre post comparison resulted in a significant SARC-F improvement (p = 0.017). A significant positive correlation was found between sarcopenic risk measured by SARC-F and poor results in functional capacity assessments (p < 0.001; r > 0.546). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at iCR after cardiac procedure have a high probability of sarcopenia, which remains high during follow-up. Further studies are needed to quantify sarcopenia in iCR patients and to investigate the benefit of a multi-faceted prehabilitation program to improve sarcopenic status and functional outcomes.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), University of Hildesheim (DE), Schüchtermann-Klinik (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg (DE), Kerckhoff Klinik (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.