Effects Of Knee Exoskeleton On Balance And Knee Flexion Angles During Drop-landing And Movement Tests

A light-weight pneumatic-powered knee exoskeleton could augment Soldiers’ mobility and lifting capabilities. However, added weight/bulkiness and artificially produced knee extension torque could compromise sensorimotor characteristics (e.g., poor balance, stiffer landing, or limited joint range-of-motion [ROM]) PURPOSE: To compare balance characteristics and knee flexion angles during drop-landing and FMS tasks with (EXO) and without (NoEXO) wearing a knee exoskeleton. METHODS: Ten healthy Soldiers conducted three visits within 10 days to the biomechanics laboratory (familiarization, EXO, and NoEXO). Subjects were asked to complete the following tasks on each visit: single-leg balance, single-leg drop-landing from 12-inch height, and select FMS (overhead squat, hurdle step-over, rotary stability, lunge, and straight leg-raise). Balance characteristics (the ground reaction forces [GRF] variability and center-of-pressure [COP] velocity) were derived from force plates while knee flexion angles during drop-landing and FMS tasks were captured using an IMU-based motion capture system. Paired t-tests were used to compare between EXO and NoEXO conditions. RESULTS: The EXO condition showed increased GRF variabilities (EXO:3.5-7.2 N, NoEXO:3.0-6.0 N, p = 0.013-0.019) and decreased COP velocity (EXO:69.1-86.0 mm/s, NoEXO:76.2-92.6 mm/s, p = 0.001-0.017). During landing, the EXO condition showed lower knee flexion angle at the initial contact (EXO:7.0-10.1°, NoEXO:11.6-18.6°, p = 0.004-0.021) and peak (EXO:45.9-47.0°, NoEXO:52.7-55.1°, p = 0.006-0.01). Additionally, the EXO condition showed less knee flexion ROM during the overhead squat (EXO:108.1-112.9°, NoEXO:120.2-121.3, p = 0.007-0.033) and hurdle step-over (EXO:114.5-115.9°, NoEXO:125.7-127.1° p = 0.004-0.005). CONCLUSIONS: While wearing EXO, subjects exhibited stiffer landings (less knee flexion) and reduced available knee ROM during FMS. Given that these compromised sensorimotor characteristics have been associated with musculoskeletal injury risk, modifications to the EXO to facilitate knee flexion during dynamic activities may be warranted. Supported by MO21500/MO210170. The opinions expressed are the authors' and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or Department of Defense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060248.48326.bb
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Knee Exoskeleton On Balance And Knee Flexion Angles During Drop-landing And Movement Tests

Takashi Nagai, Vanessa Ramirez, Cole Dempsey, David J. Zeppetelli et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Effects Of Knee Exoskeleton On Balance And Knee Flexion Angles During Drop-landing And Movement Tests

Takashi Nagai, Vanessa Ramirez, Cole Dempsey, David J. Zeppetelli, Caleb D. Johnson, Lucas C. Sarantos, C Borden
article en

Abstract

A light-weight pneumatic-powered knee exoskeleton could augment Soldiers’ mobility and lifting capabilities. However, added weight/bulkiness and artificially produced knee extension torque could compromise sensorimotor characteristics (e.g., poor balance, stiffer landing, or limited joint range-of-motion [ROM]) PURPOSE: To compare balance characteristics and knee flexion angles during drop-landing and FMS tasks with (EXO) and without (NoEXO) wearing a knee exoskeleton. METHODS: Ten healthy Soldiers conducted three visits within 10 days to the biomechanics laboratory (familiarization, EXO, and NoEXO). Subjects were asked to complete the following tasks on each visit: single-leg balance, single-leg drop-landing from 12-inch height, and select FMS (overhead squat, hurdle step-over, rotary stability, lunge, and straight leg-raise). Balance characteristics (the ground reaction forces [GRF] variability and center-of-pressure [COP] velocity) were derived from force plates while knee flexion angles during drop-landing and FMS tasks were captured using an IMU-based motion capture system. Paired t-tests were used to compare between EXO and NoEXO conditions. RESULTS: The EXO condition showed increased GRF variabilities (EXO:3.5-7.2 N, NoEXO:3.0-6.0 N, p = 0.013-0.019) and decreased COP velocity (EXO:69.1-86.0 mm/s, NoEXO:76.2-92.6 mm/s, p = 0.001-0.017). During landing, the EXO condition showed lower knee flexion angle at the initial contact (EXO:7.0-10.1°, NoEXO:11.6-18.6°, p = 0.004-0.021) and peak (EXO:45.9-47.0°, NoEXO:52.7-55.1°, p = 0.006-0.01). Additionally, the EXO condition showed less knee flexion ROM during the overhead squat (EXO:108.1-112.9°, NoEXO:120.2-121.3, p = 0.007-0.033) and hurdle step-over (EXO:114.5-115.9°, NoEXO:125.7-127.1° p = 0.004-0.005). CONCLUSIONS: While wearing EXO, subjects exhibited stiffer landings (less knee flexion) and reduced available knee ROM during FMS. Given that these compromised sensorimotor characteristics have been associated with musculoskeletal injury risk, modifications to the EXO to facilitate knee flexion during dynamic activities may be warranted. Supported by MO21500/MO210170. The opinions expressed are the authors' and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or Department of Defense.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US), United States Army (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.