Quantity, Intensity, And Enjoyment Of Physical Activity During Virtual Reality Games In Children

Sedentary lifestyles have been on the rise in the US with only 20% of children/ adolescents reporting meeting the minimum amount of recommended physical activity. In recent years virtual reality (VR) gaming has grown in popularity and accessibility. Because the technology is so new, very little is known about physical activity trends during gameplay. Two of the most popular VR games currently available are Gorilla Tag (GT) and Beat Saber (BS). No studies to our knowledge have evaluated either game in children. PURPOSE: To investigate the quantity, intensity, and enjoyment of physical activity while playing GT and BS in youth. METHODS: 21 participants (7-13 years) played two VR games (GT and BS) in a random order in a single study session. Participants played the first game for a 5-10 minute familiarization period. Then, after 5 minutes of rest, participants played the same game for another 15 minutes. Following 10 minutes of rest, the same procedure was used for the second game. The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale-child version (PACES) was completed for each game. During gameplay, participants wore a heart rate monitor and accelerometers on the dominant wrist and waist to collect physical activity (PA) data. Measures included percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage of time the waist and wrist were in sedentary time, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Dependent t-tests were used to compare measures between games. RESULTS: The results revealed that participants had more MVPA of the arm during GT (97.0% ± 2.5) compared to BS (89.4% ± 7.6; p < .001). Participants had more MVPA and LPA of the waist during GT (MVPA 22.0% ± 14.1; LPA 20.5% ± 5.4) compared to BS (MVPA 8.7% ± 8.1; LPA 9.4% ± 8.2; p’s < .001). Participants had significantly less sedentary time of the arm and waist during GT (2.4% ± 2.2; 57.5% ± 16.5) compared to BS (9.1% ± 7.5; 81.9% ± 15.6; p’s < .001). Participants also had significantly higher average and maximum HRR during GT (30.0% ± 11.6; 47.0% ± 13.8) compared to BS (20.0% ± 8.4; p < .001; 35.0% ± 8.7; p = .002). BS (4.2 ± .68) and GT (4.2 ± .55) had similar enjoyment scores on the paces. CONCLUSION: According to the accelerometer and HR data, subjects were more active while playing GT compared to BS with the GT avg HRR in the light intensity range, max HRR in moderate, BS avg HRR below light, and max HRR in the light range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001059988.91607.b4
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantity, Intensity, And Enjoyment Of Physical Activity During Virtual Reality Games In Children

Kelly M. Naugle, Carolyn L. Boone, Daniel Berg, Keith E. Naugle et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Quantity, Intensity, And Enjoyment Of Physical Activity During Virtual Reality Games In Children

Kelly M. Naugle, Carolyn L. Boone, Daniel Berg, Keith E. Naugle, Brenden Boots, Easton Hewitt
article en

Abstract

Sedentary lifestyles have been on the rise in the US with only 20% of children/ adolescents reporting meeting the minimum amount of recommended physical activity. In recent years virtual reality (VR) gaming has grown in popularity and accessibility. Because the technology is so new, very little is known about physical activity trends during gameplay. Two of the most popular VR games currently available are Gorilla Tag (GT) and Beat Saber (BS). No studies to our knowledge have evaluated either game in children. PURPOSE: To investigate the quantity, intensity, and enjoyment of physical activity while playing GT and BS in youth. METHODS: 21 participants (7-13 years) played two VR games (GT and BS) in a random order in a single study session. Participants played the first game for a 5-10 minute familiarization period. Then, after 5 minutes of rest, participants played the same game for another 15 minutes. Following 10 minutes of rest, the same procedure was used for the second game. The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale-child version (PACES) was completed for each game. During gameplay, participants wore a heart rate monitor and accelerometers on the dominant wrist and waist to collect physical activity (PA) data. Measures included percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage of time the waist and wrist were in sedentary time, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Dependent t-tests were used to compare measures between games. RESULTS: The results revealed that participants had more MVPA of the arm during GT (97.0% ± 2.5) compared to BS (89.4% ± 7.6; p < .001). Participants had more MVPA and LPA of the waist during GT (MVPA 22.0% ± 14.1; LPA 20.5% ± 5.4) compared to BS (MVPA 8.7% ± 8.1; LPA 9.4% ± 8.2; p’s < .001). Participants had significantly less sedentary time of the arm and waist during GT (2.4% ± 2.2; 57.5% ± 16.5) compared to BS (9.1% ± 7.5; 81.9% ± 15.6; p’s < .001). Participants also had significantly higher average and maximum HRR during GT (30.0% ± 11.6; 47.0% ± 13.8) compared to BS (20.0% ± 8.4; p < .001; 35.0% ± 8.7; p = .002). BS (4.2 ± .68) and GT (4.2 ± .55) had similar enjoyment scores on the paces. CONCLUSION: According to the accelerometer and HR data, subjects were more active while playing GT compared to BS with the GT avg HRR in the light intensity range, max HRR in moderate, BS avg HRR below light, and max HRR in the light range.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.