Use Of Graphically Depicting Time-based V-slope To Determine Gas Exchange Threshold

Three methods are commonly in use for the determination of gas exchange threshold (GET): v-slope(VS), ventilatory equivalent(VEQ) and end-tidal(ET). For VS, VCO2 is plotted against VO2 (x-axis), and for VEQ and ET, each variable is plotted against elapsed time(x-axis). When it appears that three is discrepancy between the results obtained by VS vs. VEQ or ET, it is often difficult to pinpoint precisely where discrepancy exists, because data points do not correspond on the same y-axis. PURPOSE: To devise a way to construct a time-based v-slope graph. METHODS: A new index, d, was created by subtracting VO2 from VCO2, and it was plotted against time. In Figure a & b, d = VCO2-VO2 (upper) is plotted against time, in the same manner as VEQ(lower) is. Fig(a) represents a case in which v-slope and VEQ agree (type-A response), while Fig(b) shows decreasing VEQ values despite increasing d, indicating inadequate ventilatory response to CO2 (type-B). The database of 127 subjects (age: 51 ± 21, 93 males, 66 healthy subjects, 20 being treated for CV risk factors, and 41 cardiac patients ) who underwent maximal symptom-limited exercise was used to assess the utility of this approach (d). Each of three GET methods was used independently and blinded to other 2 methods. RESULTS: The mean GET (mL/min) by obtained by VS, VEQ and ET was 882 ± 314, 1003 ± 387, and 869 ± 330, respectively (VEQ > VS or VE, p ≤ 0.05). In 2 cases, GET could not be detected by any method. The most remarkable finding was in 14 cases, in which both VEQ/ET could not detect GET, while VS could. This response was observed in 7 normal subjects and 7 cardiac patients. Type-B was observed in 11 of 14 these discordant cases, but only in 35 of 111 cases in which both VS and VEQ/ET could detect GET (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Time-based v-slope graphically depicted a clear discrepancy when v-slope and other methods of detecting GET did not agree. Inappropriate ventilatory response to CO2 was the main cause of the discrepancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060352.31452.77
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use Of Graphically Depicting Time-based V-slope To Determine Gas Exchange Threshold

Hirotaka Nishijima, Kazuyuki Kominami
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
article

Use Of Graphically Depicting Time-based V-slope To Determine Gas Exchange Threshold

Hirotaka Nishijima, Kazuyuki Kominami
article en

Abstract

Three methods are commonly in use for the determination of gas exchange threshold (GET): v-slope(VS), ventilatory equivalent(VEQ) and end-tidal(ET). For VS, VCO2 is plotted against VO2 (x-axis), and for VEQ and ET, each variable is plotted against elapsed time(x-axis). When it appears that three is discrepancy between the results obtained by VS vs. VEQ or ET, it is often difficult to pinpoint precisely where discrepancy exists, because data points do not correspond on the same y-axis. PURPOSE: To devise a way to construct a time-based v-slope graph. METHODS: A new index, d, was created by subtracting VO2 from VCO2, and it was plotted against time. In Figure a & b, d = VCO2-VO2 (upper) is plotted against time, in the same manner as VEQ(lower) is. Fig(a) represents a case in which v-slope and VEQ agree (type-A response), while Fig(b) shows decreasing VEQ values despite increasing d, indicating inadequate ventilatory response to CO2 (type-B). The database of 127 subjects (age: 51 ± 21, 93 males, 66 healthy subjects, 20 being treated for CV risk factors, and 41 cardiac patients ) who underwent maximal symptom-limited exercise was used to assess the utility of this approach (d). Each of three GET methods was used independently and blinded to other 2 methods. RESULTS: The mean GET (mL/min) by obtained by VS, VEQ and ET was 882 ± 314, 1003 ± 387, and 869 ± 330, respectively (VEQ > VS or VE, p ≤ 0.05). In 2 cases, GET could not be detected by any method. The most remarkable finding was in 14 cases, in which both VEQ/ET could not detect GET, while VS could. This response was observed in 7 normal subjects and 7 cardiac patients. Type-B was observed in 11 of 14 these discordant cases, but only in 35 of 111 cases in which both VS and VEQ/ET could detect GET (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Time-based v-slope graphically depicted a clear discrepancy when v-slope and other methods of detecting GET did not agree. Inappropriate ventilatory response to CO2 was the main cause of the discrepancy.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital (JP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.