Acute Effects Of Using Mask During Exercise On Physiological Indices

Wearing a mask during exercise may impede breathing, cause dyspnea, exacerbate perceptual feel, discomfort accompanied by sympathetic stress response. PURPOSE: Investigate the use of cloth mask (CM) on time-to-exhaustion (TTE), physiological indices, OMNI Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and Ratings of Mask Discomfort (RMD) on lactate threshold (LT) and peak exercise. METHODS: Sixteen healthy males (age: 30.6 ± 8.4 years; height: 1.72 ± 0.04 m; weight: 67.0 ± 5.8 kg; body mass index (BMI): 22.6 ± 1.9 kg·m-2, body fat percentage: 16.0 ± 4.7 %; maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 44.2 ± 4.8 mL·min·kg-1)) volunteered and were randomly assigned to either CM or no mask (NM) with a cross over design and a 7-day washout period. Body composition was measured using Bioimpedance Analysis machine. Participants underwent a discontinuous incremental running treadmill protocol. RESULTS: ANOVA repeated measures (df, 1, 8) indicated significant differences between overall variables and groups (F = 10.75, p = 0.001); between groups for oxygen uptake (VO2) (NM: 32.02 ± 8.78 vs CM: 26.92 ± 7.34 mL·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.00); Overall mask discomfort (OMD) (NM: 1.96 ± 1.74 vs CM: 4.02 ± 2.11, p = 0.00); Breathing resistance (BR) (NM: 1.69 ± 1.69 vs 4.36 ± 2.18, p = 0.00); hotness, warmness, stuffiness (HWS) (NM: 1.64 ± 3.46 vs CM: 3.46 ± 2.14, p = 0.00); Odor (NM: 0.20 ± 0.59 vs CM: 0.42 ± 0.94, p = 0.00). Significant differences were found at peak exercise between conditions for TTE (NM: 122.00 ± 13.23 vs CM: 106.00 ± 17.65 min, p = 0.00), VO2max (NM: 44.17 ± 4.84 vs CM: 31.73 ± 9.00 mL·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.00); heart rate (NM: 185.75 ± 10.75 vs CM: 178.63 ± 1.98 beats·min-1, p = 0.00); minute ventilation (NM: 86.03 ± 12.66 vs CM: 55.77 ± 13.30 L·min-1, p = 0.00), lactate (NM: 7.44 ± 1.01 vs CM: 6.04 ± 1.98 mmol·L-1, p = 0.001) and respiratory rate (NM: 52.67 ± 9.43 vs CM: 48.00 ± 8.79 breaths·min-1, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Amidst significant changes in physiological indices associated with mask during exercise, there were higher perceptual discomforts though generally tolerable by healthy active population from light exercise intensity to LT. CM during exercise at high intensity levels are generally not advisable as almost all indices were significantly different and may potentially cause adverse physiological or physical response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001059048.51055.2f
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Effects Of Using Mask During Exercise On Physiological Indices

Govindasamy Balasekaran, Visvasuresh Victor Govindaswamy, Yew Cheo Ng, Boon Kwang Lim
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Acute Effects Of Using Mask During Exercise On Physiological Indices

Govindasamy Balasekaran, Visvasuresh Victor Govindaswamy, Yew Cheo Ng, Boon Kwang Lim
article en

Abstract

Wearing a mask during exercise may impede breathing, cause dyspnea, exacerbate perceptual feel, discomfort accompanied by sympathetic stress response. PURPOSE: Investigate the use of cloth mask (CM) on time-to-exhaustion (TTE), physiological indices, OMNI Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and Ratings of Mask Discomfort (RMD) on lactate threshold (LT) and peak exercise. METHODS: Sixteen healthy males (age: 30.6 ± 8.4 years; height: 1.72 ± 0.04 m; weight: 67.0 ± 5.8 kg; body mass index (BMI): 22.6 ± 1.9 kg·m-2, body fat percentage: 16.0 ± 4.7 %; maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): 44.2 ± 4.8 mL·min·kg-1)) volunteered and were randomly assigned to either CM or no mask (NM) with a cross over design and a 7-day washout period. Body composition was measured using Bioimpedance Analysis machine. Participants underwent a discontinuous incremental running treadmill protocol. RESULTS: ANOVA repeated measures (df, 1, 8) indicated significant differences between overall variables and groups (F = 10.75, p = 0.001); between groups for oxygen uptake (VO2) (NM: 32.02 ± 8.78 vs CM: 26.92 ± 7.34 mL·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.00); Overall mask discomfort (OMD) (NM: 1.96 ± 1.74 vs CM: 4.02 ± 2.11, p = 0.00); Breathing resistance (BR) (NM: 1.69 ± 1.69 vs 4.36 ± 2.18, p = 0.00); hotness, warmness, stuffiness (HWS) (NM: 1.64 ± 3.46 vs CM: 3.46 ± 2.14, p = 0.00); Odor (NM: 0.20 ± 0.59 vs CM: 0.42 ± 0.94, p = 0.00). Significant differences were found at peak exercise between conditions for TTE (NM: 122.00 ± 13.23 vs CM: 106.00 ± 17.65 min, p = 0.00), VO2max (NM: 44.17 ± 4.84 vs CM: 31.73 ± 9.00 mL·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.00); heart rate (NM: 185.75 ± 10.75 vs CM: 178.63 ± 1.98 beats·min-1, p = 0.00); minute ventilation (NM: 86.03 ± 12.66 vs CM: 55.77 ± 13.30 L·min-1, p = 0.00), lactate (NM: 7.44 ± 1.01 vs CM: 6.04 ± 1.98 mmol·L-1, p = 0.001) and respiratory rate (NM: 52.67 ± 9.43 vs CM: 48.00 ± 8.79 breaths·min-1, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Amidst significant changes in physiological indices associated with mask during exercise, there were higher perceptual discomforts though generally tolerable by healthy active population from light exercise intensity to LT. CM during exercise at high intensity levels are generally not advisable as almost all indices were significantly different and may potentially cause adverse physiological or physical response.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.