Effects Of Static Versus Dynamic Stretching On Lower Extremity Power Output And Flexibility In Dancers

INTRODUCTION: Collegiate dancers require a large range of motion throughout all joints. Previous research has shown static (STA) stretching to be most effective at improving flexibility. Due to this factor, warmups for dance are primarily based on STA stretching to allow dancers to reach their maximum flexibility. Previous research has also shown that STA stretching before activity can have negative effects on an athlete’s power output, and a large amount of power is essential for dance. PURPOSE: Determine the effect of STA and dynamic (DYN) stretching on lower extremity power and flexibility in collegiate dancers. METHODS: Subjects (N = 10) were recruited from the U of A Dance Team. Data collection involved 3 sessions with different stretching protocols. DYN warm-up, STA warmup, or no warmup (CON) were completed before different sessions. Biodex testing was performed to assess individual power output of right and left knee extension and flexion and a flexibility test was performed to test hamstring flexibility. Paired t-test were used to assess significance. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Significance (p < 0.05) was found in right knee extension mean peak torque (98.8 DYN vs 91.0 ft/lbs STA), left knee extension mean peak torque (73.5 ft/lbs CON vs 99.4 ft/lbs DYN), right knee mean flexibility (18.9 in. CON vs 20.5 in. STA) and left knee mean flexibility (18.5 in. CON vs 20.5 in. STA). No other measurements showed significance. CONCLUSION: There was a functional difference in lower extremity power output for all power measures, but only some to a statistically significant level. Previous research has demonstrated similar power output results in dancers following DYN vs. STA warmups where no significant difference was observed. The results contradicted previous research which resulted in a significant increase of flexibility from DYN versus STA stretching in dancers. Future research should analyze flexibility and power output in dancers after being accustomed to dynamic warmups for a longer period of time, should analyze a different group of athletes, and analyze results after performing warmups of equal length.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054412.76435.59
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Static Versus Dynamic Stretching On Lower Extremity Power Output And Flexibility In Dancers

Stephanie Ann Davis-Dieringer, Stacey Buser, Ronald Otterstetter, Robert Banaga et al.
1 citations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diversity and Impact of Dance
0.51
article

Effects Of Static Versus Dynamic Stretching On Lower Extremity Power Output And Flexibility In Dancers

Stephanie Ann Davis-Dieringer, Stacey Buser, Ronald Otterstetter, Robert Banaga, Meloney George
article en
1 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Collegiate dancers require a large range of motion throughout all joints. Previous research has shown static (STA) stretching to be most effective at improving flexibility. Due to this factor, warmups for dance are primarily based on STA stretching to allow dancers to reach their maximum flexibility. Previous research has also shown that STA stretching before activity can have negative effects on an athlete’s power output, and a large amount of power is essential for dance. PURPOSE: Determine the effect of STA and dynamic (DYN) stretching on lower extremity power and flexibility in collegiate dancers. METHODS: Subjects (N = 10) were recruited from the U of A Dance Team. Data collection involved 3 sessions with different stretching protocols. DYN warm-up, STA warmup, or no warmup (CON) were completed before different sessions. Biodex testing was performed to assess individual power output of right and left knee extension and flexion and a flexibility test was performed to test hamstring flexibility. Paired t-test were used to assess significance. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Significance (p < 0.05) was found in right knee extension mean peak torque (98.8 DYN vs 91.0 ft/lbs STA), left knee extension mean peak torque (73.5 ft/lbs CON vs 99.4 ft/lbs DYN), right knee mean flexibility (18.9 in. CON vs 20.5 in. STA) and left knee mean flexibility (18.5 in. CON vs 20.5 in. STA). No other measurements showed significance. CONCLUSION: There was a functional difference in lower extremity power output for all power measures, but only some to a statistically significant level. Previous research has demonstrated similar power output results in dancers following DYN vs. STA warmups where no significant difference was observed. The results contradicted previous research which resulted in a significant increase of flexibility from DYN versus STA stretching in dancers. Future research should analyze flexibility and power output in dancers after being accustomed to dynamic warmups for a longer period of time, should analyze a different group of athletes, and analyze results after performing warmups of equal length.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Akron (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.