Muscular Fitness And Throwing Qualities In Collegiate Ultimate Frisbee

PURPOSE: To compare measures of muscular fitness and throwing quality between collegiate ultimate frisbee athletes and collegiate non-players. METHODS: Forty-eight college students (23 women; 25 men) volunteered to participate in this study. Students were categorized as experienced ultimate frisbee players (UF) (n = 15, 2 women) or non-players (NP) (n = 33, 21 women) using a questionnaire. UF consisted of collegiate club ultimate frisbee players and/or students with at least 6 months of ultimate frisbee experience. NP consisted of exercise science students who have little to no prior experience with ultimate frisbee (less than 6 months). During visit 1, percent body fat (%BF) and body mass (BM) were measured using a Tanita Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer. Wingspan was measured using a wall-mounted measuring tape. Grip strength was measured using a Grip-A hand grip dynamometer. Upper body muscular endurance was measured using the FitnessGram cadence push-up test. During visit 2, disc throwing accuracy and distance were measured using a throwing test consisting of targets at different ranges (5 m, 15 m, 25 m). Subject characteristics, fitness assessments, and throwing measures were compared between UF and NP using independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between UF and NP for height (177.8 ± 9.9 vs. 168.0 ± 9.8 cm, p = .003), BM (83.5 ± 16.7 vs. 68.8 ± 13.9 kg; p = .003), BMI (26.4 ± 4.4 vs. 24.1 ± 3.0 kg·m-2, p = .04), wingspan (180.9 ± 11.6 vs. 167.5 ± 14.9 cm, p = .003), grip strength (42.8 ± 7.8 vs. 34.6 ± 10.2 kg, p = .008), 5 m accuracy (9.3 ± 1.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.5 throws, p = .006), 5 m distance (11.1 ± 1.8 vs. 9.2 ± 1.4 m, p < .001), 15 m accuracy (3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 1.1 ± 1.3 throws, p < .001), 15 m distance (21.6 ± 2.6 vs. 17.3 ± 3.8 m, p < .001), 25 m accuracy (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1 throws, p < .001), and 25 m distance (27.4 ± 1.7 vs. 21.3 ± 5.4 m, p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UF had greater height, BM, BMI, wingspan, grip strength, as well as all throwing accuracy and distance measures when compared to NP. However, no differences were found for age, %BF, and upper body muscular endurance. Future studies should measure additional variables such as throwing velocity, running speed, vertical jump height, and differences between UF position players (e.g. handler, cutter).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054516.13110.67
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muscular Fitness And Throwing Qualities In Collegiate Ultimate Frisbee

Luke Haile, Joseph L. Andreacci, Taylor Keiser, Andrea Fradkin
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Muscular Fitness And Throwing Qualities In Collegiate Ultimate Frisbee

Luke Haile, Joseph L. Andreacci, Taylor Keiser, Andrea Fradkin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare measures of muscular fitness and throwing quality between collegiate ultimate frisbee athletes and collegiate non-players. METHODS: Forty-eight college students (23 women; 25 men) volunteered to participate in this study. Students were categorized as experienced ultimate frisbee players (UF) (n = 15, 2 women) or non-players (NP) (n = 33, 21 women) using a questionnaire. UF consisted of collegiate club ultimate frisbee players and/or students with at least 6 months of ultimate frisbee experience. NP consisted of exercise science students who have little to no prior experience with ultimate frisbee (less than 6 months). During visit 1, percent body fat (%BF) and body mass (BM) were measured using a Tanita Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer. Wingspan was measured using a wall-mounted measuring tape. Grip strength was measured using a Grip-A hand grip dynamometer. Upper body muscular endurance was measured using the FitnessGram cadence push-up test. During visit 2, disc throwing accuracy and distance were measured using a throwing test consisting of targets at different ranges (5 m, 15 m, 25 m). Subject characteristics, fitness assessments, and throwing measures were compared between UF and NP using independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between UF and NP for height (177.8 ± 9.9 vs. 168.0 ± 9.8 cm, p = .003), BM (83.5 ± 16.7 vs. 68.8 ± 13.9 kg; p = .003), BMI (26.4 ± 4.4 vs. 24.1 ± 3.0 kg·m-2, p = .04), wingspan (180.9 ± 11.6 vs. 167.5 ± 14.9 cm, p = .003), grip strength (42.8 ± 7.8 vs. 34.6 ± 10.2 kg, p = .008), 5 m accuracy (9.3 ± 1.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.5 throws, p = .006), 5 m distance (11.1 ± 1.8 vs. 9.2 ± 1.4 m, p < .001), 15 m accuracy (3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 1.1 ± 1.3 throws, p < .001), 15 m distance (21.6 ± 2.6 vs. 17.3 ± 3.8 m, p < .001), 25 m accuracy (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1 throws, p < .001), and 25 m distance (27.4 ± 1.7 vs. 21.3 ± 5.4 m, p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UF had greater height, BM, BMI, wingspan, grip strength, as well as all throwing accuracy and distance measures when compared to NP. However, no differences were found for age, %BF, and upper body muscular endurance. Future studies should measure additional variables such as throwing velocity, running speed, vertical jump height, and differences between UF position players (e.g. handler, cutter).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Bloomsburg University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.