Divergent Findings Between Bone Mineral Density And Stress Fracture Incidence In Track And Field Athletes

Engagement in bone-loading physical activity is associated with improved bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced fracture risk. However, athletes competing in cross-country and track and field (XC + T&F) who consistently engage in anabolic skeletal exercises have a high bone injury incidence. PURPOSE: To compare Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) derived bone measures and key factors that modulate skeletal health between XC + T&F and Controls and within XC + T&F based on stress fracture (SFx) history. METHODS: Forty-seven Division I XC + T&F and thirty physically active non-athlete Controls completed DXA scans, training, injury, sleep, and dietary logs. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were performed between XC + T&F and Controls and within XC + T&F based on SFx history (SFx n = 18; None n = 29), α < 0.05. RESULTS: Despite XC + T&F and Controls being equivalent for age, height, body mass, body mass index, and sleep and dietary quality (all p ≥ 0.089), XC + T&F reported significantly greater SFx incidence (p = 0.023). Further, XC + T&F had higher BMD Z-Scores and percent lean body mass (LM%) (both p < 0.001). Within XC + T&F, SFx groups were equivalent for all anthropometrics, total body BMD Z-Score, LM%, weekly mileage, resistance training frequency, and sleep quality (all p ≥ 0.286). XC + T&F athletes with history of SFx had better Healthy Eating Index scores (p = 0.007); despite consuming significantly fewer calories per day (p = 0.04). Lastly, there was a significant association between SFx incidence and self-reported dietary restriction (χ2 (1, n = 47) =6.47, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Dietary restriction was associated with SFx incidence, independent of body composition or bone health metrics. These data suggest that many standard tools used to identify SFx risk in this cohort may lack sensitivity and more comprehensive screening tools are needed. This further supports the recent expansion of the relative energy deficiency in sport initiative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054460.10848.69
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent Findings Between Bone Mineral Density And Stress Fracture Incidence In Track And Field Athletes

Allen L. Redinger, Nicholas J. Spokely, Jillian Joyce, Grace E. White et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Divergent Findings Between Bone Mineral Density And Stress Fracture Incidence In Track And Field Athletes

Allen L. Redinger, Nicholas J. Spokely, Jillian Joyce, Grace E. White, Olivia K. Anderson, Breanne S. Baker, Shawn Allen, Sloane A. Montgomery
article en

Abstract

Engagement in bone-loading physical activity is associated with improved bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced fracture risk. However, athletes competing in cross-country and track and field (XC + T&F) who consistently engage in anabolic skeletal exercises have a high bone injury incidence. PURPOSE: To compare Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) derived bone measures and key factors that modulate skeletal health between XC + T&F and Controls and within XC + T&F based on stress fracture (SFx) history. METHODS: Forty-seven Division I XC + T&F and thirty physically active non-athlete Controls completed DXA scans, training, injury, sleep, and dietary logs. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were performed between XC + T&F and Controls and within XC + T&F based on SFx history (SFx n = 18; None n = 29), α < 0.05. RESULTS: Despite XC + T&F and Controls being equivalent for age, height, body mass, body mass index, and sleep and dietary quality (all p ≥ 0.089), XC + T&F reported significantly greater SFx incidence (p = 0.023). Further, XC + T&F had higher BMD Z-Scores and percent lean body mass (LM%) (both p < 0.001). Within XC + T&F, SFx groups were equivalent for all anthropometrics, total body BMD Z-Score, LM%, weekly mileage, resistance training frequency, and sleep quality (all p ≥ 0.286). XC + T&F athletes with history of SFx had better Healthy Eating Index scores (p = 0.007); despite consuming significantly fewer calories per day (p = 0.04). Lastly, there was a significant association between SFx incidence and self-reported dietary restriction (χ2 (1, n = 47) =6.47, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Dietary restriction was associated with SFx incidence, independent of body composition or bone health metrics. These data suggest that many standard tools used to identify SFx risk in this cohort may lack sensitivity and more comprehensive screening tools are needed. This further supports the recent expansion of the relative energy deficiency in sport initiative.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Oklahoma State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.