Effect Of Weekly Set Progressions On Muscle Hypertrophy Adaptations In Healthy Females

Resistance training (RT) volume is an essential training variable underpinning muscle mass accretion. However, the effects of cycling weekly sets number on muscle hypertrophy adaptations remains unclear, particularly in females. PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of increasing weekly sets every two weeks versus performing a constant set volume on lateral thigh thickness in healthy females over a 12-week study period. METHODS: Twenty healthy females (age 27 ± 4 years; RT experience 2 ± 1 years; prior quadriceps-focused training volume 22 ± 8 sets/wk) were recruited. To mitigate a potential confounding effect from previous training volume, participants underwent a two-week volume reduction phase, followed by a 2-week familiarization phase, similarly increasing their weekly sets. Subsequently, they started their quadriceps-focused training intervention. Participants were randomly allocated to a Constant Group (CON; n = 9) set at 22 weekly sets or; Progression Group (PROG; n = 11) that increased two sets per week every two weeks. The PROG group started at 16 sets and finished at 26 sets per week. The average number of weekly sets was 22 for CON and 21 for PROG. Participants performed a lower-limb training program (barbell back squat, leg press 45, seated knee extension, Romanian deadlift and seated knee flexion) twice a week (6-8 and 10-12 repetitions, respectively) for 12 weeks. Intensity of effort was fixed at two repetitions in reserve/set, with only the last set of each exercise performed to concentric failure. Lateral thigh muscle thickness (MT) at 50% of the femur length was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of the training program. RESULTS: There were no differences in volume load after the intervention (p = 0.540) and no time by group interaction (p = 0.881). We observed a main effect of time for MT changes (p = 0.035) but no group effects (p = 0.910). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that progressively adding two weekly sets compared to maintaining a fixed volume, at least under equated volume load conditions, does not elicit greater hypertrophic adaptations in the lateral thigh muscles of healthy females over a 12-week training period. AE, GO and MFB would like to thank for Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES - Finance Code 001) for their respective scholarships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001059800.26832.59
Primary Topic
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect Of Weekly Set Progressions On Muscle Hypertrophy Adaptations In Healthy Females

Gustavo Oneda, Tácito Pessoa de Souza, Stuart M. Phillips, Alysson Enes et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
article

Effect Of Weekly Set Progressions On Muscle Hypertrophy Adaptations In Healthy Females

Gustavo Oneda, Tácito Pessoa de Souza, Stuart M. Phillips, Alysson Enes, Eduardo O. De Souza, Ana Carolina G. Macedo, Luís Henrique Boiko Ferreira, Mauro F. Bernardo, Camila Lopes Correa, Danilo Fonseca Leonel
article en

Abstract

Resistance training (RT) volume is an essential training variable underpinning muscle mass accretion. However, the effects of cycling weekly sets number on muscle hypertrophy adaptations remains unclear, particularly in females. PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of increasing weekly sets every two weeks versus performing a constant set volume on lateral thigh thickness in healthy females over a 12-week study period. METHODS: Twenty healthy females (age 27 ± 4 years; RT experience 2 ± 1 years; prior quadriceps-focused training volume 22 ± 8 sets/wk) were recruited. To mitigate a potential confounding effect from previous training volume, participants underwent a two-week volume reduction phase, followed by a 2-week familiarization phase, similarly increasing their weekly sets. Subsequently, they started their quadriceps-focused training intervention. Participants were randomly allocated to a Constant Group (CON; n = 9) set at 22 weekly sets or; Progression Group (PROG; n = 11) that increased two sets per week every two weeks. The PROG group started at 16 sets and finished at 26 sets per week. The average number of weekly sets was 22 for CON and 21 for PROG. Participants performed a lower-limb training program (barbell back squat, leg press 45, seated knee extension, Romanian deadlift and seated knee flexion) twice a week (6-8 and 10-12 repetitions, respectively) for 12 weeks. Intensity of effort was fixed at two repetitions in reserve/set, with only the last set of each exercise performed to concentric failure. Lateral thigh muscle thickness (MT) at 50% of the femur length was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of the training program. RESULTS: There were no differences in volume load after the intervention (p = 0.540) and no time by group interaction (p = 0.881). We observed a main effect of time for MT changes (p = 0.035) but no group effects (p = 0.910). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that progressively adding two weekly sets compared to maintaining a fixed volume, at least under equated volume load conditions, does not elicit greater hypertrophic adaptations in the lateral thigh muscles of healthy females over a 12-week training period. AE, GO and MFB would like to thank for Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES - Finance Code 001) for their respective scholarships.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), University of Tampa (US), McMaster University (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Muscle Physiology and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.