Deranged Liver Biochemistry in a Non-Liver Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Study

Introduction: Common indications for admission to a liver intensive care unit (LICU) are often due to complications of an underlying chronic liver disease or to an acute insult to the liver either by bacterial or viral infections, alcohol or drugs. Secondary or acquired liver injury occurs in patients with systemic disease in patients who are admitted to a non-LICU setting. These patients are often hemodynamically unstable with multiorgan failure. The aim of the study was to understand the pattern of liver injury in patients admitted to a non-LICU for issues unrelated directly to the liver. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to medical, neuro and cardiac ICU of the institution were included. All patients had liver biochemistry at admission. R factor (RF) criteria (alanine aminotransferase: S. Alkaline phosphatase ratio) was used for stratifying the liver injury as hepatocellular (HC) (RF-HC; ≥5), cholestatic (RF-C; ≤2) and mixed type (RF-HC+C; 2–5). Patients were followed up in the ICU until discharge. Statistical Analysis: SPSS v26 (IBM Corp.) was used for analysis. Chi-square test was done for categorical variables and Fisher’s exact test, when the expected frequency in the contingency table was <5 in more than 25% of the cells. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: 108 (43.9%) of 246 admissions had liver injury (43.9%). The elevation in liver enzymes were <2 times the upper limit of normal range. There were no significant differences in enzyme elevations in the 3 ICUs. The most common type of liver injury was RF-C (67; 62%) followed by RF-HC+C (34; 31.5%) and RF-HC (7; 6.48%). There was no difference in the disease specific liver injury. Patients with RF-C needed significantly more inotrope support ( P = 0.001); 76% survived ( P = 0.023). Those with RF-HC required hemodialysis ( P = 0.001) with poor survival outcome (42.9%). Conclusions: Liver enzymes are not significantly elevated in non-LICU patients. RF criteria is useful in not only predicting the type of liver injury but also predicting the likely outcome.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Gastroenterology Hepatology and Endoscopy Practice
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ghep.ghep_21_24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deranged Liver Biochemistry in a Non-Liver Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Study

Joy Verghese, Jayanthi Venkataraman, Brinda Mahadevan, B. Rajendra Prasad
1 citations
Gastroenterology Hepatology and Endoscopy Practice
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
0.47
article

Deranged Liver Biochemistry in a Non-Liver Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Study

Joy Verghese, Jayanthi Venkataraman, Brinda Mahadevan, B. Rajendra Prasad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Common indications for admission to a liver intensive care unit (LICU) are often due to complications of an underlying chronic liver disease or to an acute insult to the liver either by bacterial or viral infections, alcohol or drugs. Secondary or acquired liver injury occurs in patients with systemic disease in patients who are admitted to a non-LICU setting. These patients are often hemodynamically unstable with multiorgan failure. The aim of the study was to understand the pattern of liver injury in patients admitted to a non-LICU for issues unrelated directly to the liver. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to medical, neuro and cardiac ICU of the institution were included. All patients had liver biochemistry at admission. R factor (RF) criteria (alanine aminotransferase: S. Alkaline phosphatase ratio) was used for stratifying the liver injury as hepatocellular (HC) (RF-HC; ≥5), cholestatic (RF-C; ≤2) and mixed type (RF-HC+C; 2–5). Patients were followed up in the ICU until discharge. Statistical Analysis: SPSS v26 (IBM Corp.) was used for analysis. Chi-square test was done for categorical variables and Fisher’s exact test, when the expected frequency in the contingency table was <5 in more than 25% of the cells. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: 108 (43.9%) of 246 admissions had liver injury (43.9%). The elevation in liver enzymes were <2 times the upper limit of normal range. There were no significant differences in enzyme elevations in the 3 ICUs. The most common type of liver injury was RF-C (67; 62%) followed by RF-HC+C (34; 31.5%) and RF-HC (7; 6.48%). There was no difference in the disease specific liver injury. Patients with RF-C needed significantly more inotrope support ( P = 0.001); 76% survived ( P = 0.023). Those with RF-HC required hemodialysis ( P = 0.001) with poor survival outcome (42.9%). Conclusions: Liver enzymes are not significantly elevated in non-LICU patients. RF criteria is useful in not only predicting the type of liver injury but also predicting the likely outcome.

Gastroenterology Hepatology and Endoscopy PracticeVol. 4(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.