Evaluating The Current Classification Points Addition On Performance In Female Wheelchair Rugby Players

INTRODUCTION: Wheelchair rugby (WR) is one of the few mixed gender Paralympic sports, where males and females compete together. A point-based classification system is used, ranking athletes as low-point (LP, 0.5-1.5) or high-point (HP, 2.0-3.5) players, based on upper-extremity and trunk impairments. Teams are allowed a total of 8.0 points across four players on court at a time, with an additional 0.5-point for every female on court. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to explore the isometric strength and sprint performance of female WR players to determine whether an additional 0.5-point for female players is a fair rule in WR. METHODS: Twenty-nine female and fifty-six male WR athletes (10 nationalities) across all classification levels volunteered to participate in this research. Health conditions included spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and amputations. All WR players completed a set of isometric strength tests (n = 6) and 3x10m sprints on court. The isometric test battery consisted of (a) shoulder flexion, (b) shoulder extension, (c) elbow flexion and (d) elbow extension for both arms. In addition, a sport-specific (e) push and (f) pull test was performed. One-way ANOVAs were conducted to test the differences between groups (LP and HP, Females and Males). The HP-players were split into a group with trunk (TR) and without trunk (NT) function. RESULTS: Female LP-players scored lower compared to Male LP-players on elbow flexion (113 N vs 214 N, p < 0.001), push (155 N vs. 287 N, p < 0.05) and pull (177 N vs. 285 N, p < 0.05) strength. Female HP-NT-players scored lower compared to Male HP-NT-players on elbow flexion (108 N vs 301 N, p < 0.001), shoulder flexion (158 N vs. 362 N, p < 0.01), shoulder extension (125 N vs. 259 N, p < 0.05), push (198 N vs. 508 N, p < 0.001) and pull (179 N vs. 407 N, p < 0.001) strength. Female HP-TR players scored lower compared to Male HP-TR players on elbow flexion (168 N vs. 362 N, p < 0.001), shoulder flexion (170 N vs. 499 N, p < 0.01) and push (153 N vs. 447 N, p < 0.001) strength. No differences were found in sprint performance between the sub-groups, 2 m times (0.9-1.6 s) and 10 m times (3.2-5.8 s). CONCLUSION: Female WR players have less strength compared to male players, yet sprinting performance was similar between sub-groups. Working towards fair sports in WR is essential for participation and equity. Great Britain Wheelchair Rugby

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061332.26142.a3
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating The Current Classification Points Addition On Performance In Female Wheelchair Rugby Players

Mike J. Hutchinson, Thomas Rietveld, Viola C. Altmann, Victoria L. Tolfrey
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Evaluating The Current Classification Points Addition On Performance In Female Wheelchair Rugby Players

Mike J. Hutchinson, Thomas Rietveld, Viola C. Altmann, Victoria L. Tolfrey
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Wheelchair rugby (WR) is one of the few mixed gender Paralympic sports, where males and females compete together. A point-based classification system is used, ranking athletes as low-point (LP, 0.5-1.5) or high-point (HP, 2.0-3.5) players, based on upper-extremity and trunk impairments. Teams are allowed a total of 8.0 points across four players on court at a time, with an additional 0.5-point for every female on court. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to explore the isometric strength and sprint performance of female WR players to determine whether an additional 0.5-point for female players is a fair rule in WR. METHODS: Twenty-nine female and fifty-six male WR athletes (10 nationalities) across all classification levels volunteered to participate in this research. Health conditions included spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and amputations. All WR players completed a set of isometric strength tests (n = 6) and 3x10m sprints on court. The isometric test battery consisted of (a) shoulder flexion, (b) shoulder extension, (c) elbow flexion and (d) elbow extension for both arms. In addition, a sport-specific (e) push and (f) pull test was performed. One-way ANOVAs were conducted to test the differences between groups (LP and HP, Females and Males). The HP-players were split into a group with trunk (TR) and without trunk (NT) function. RESULTS: Female LP-players scored lower compared to Male LP-players on elbow flexion (113 N vs 214 N, p < 0.001), push (155 N vs. 287 N, p < 0.05) and pull (177 N vs. 285 N, p < 0.05) strength. Female HP-NT-players scored lower compared to Male HP-NT-players on elbow flexion (108 N vs 301 N, p < 0.001), shoulder flexion (158 N vs. 362 N, p < 0.01), shoulder extension (125 N vs. 259 N, p < 0.05), push (198 N vs. 508 N, p < 0.001) and pull (179 N vs. 407 N, p < 0.001) strength. Female HP-TR players scored lower compared to Male HP-TR players on elbow flexion (168 N vs. 362 N, p < 0.001), shoulder flexion (170 N vs. 499 N, p < 0.01) and push (153 N vs. 447 N, p < 0.001) strength. No differences were found in sprint performance between the sub-groups, 2 m times (0.9-1.6 s) and 10 m times (3.2-5.8 s). CONCLUSION: Female WR players have less strength compared to male players, yet sprinting performance was similar between sub-groups. Working towards fair sports in WR is essential for participation and equity. Great Britain Wheelchair Rugby

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Loughborough University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.