Effect Of Different Exercise Environments On Sweat Metrics In Cross-country Athletes

: Sweat rate (SR) and sodium loss from exercise have been shown to vary between individuals. Previous research has focused on developing normative data without accounting for environmental factors that may influence sweat metrics. Thus, the current study investigated the impact of different environmental conditions on sweat metrics in a homogenous group. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of different exercise environments on SR and sweat sodium concentration ([Na+]) during a prolonged low-intensity exercise in male DII cross-country runners. METHODS: Four male collegiate cross-country runners performed a 50-minute low-intensity exercise protocol (7:00-7:30 per mile running pace) on an outdoor track (25.6 °C, 11% humidity) and in an indoor gym (21.1 °C, 29% humidity). SR was calculated from pre- to post-exercise change in body mass. A sweat patch was used to measure regional sweat [Na+]. Height, body composition, and urine specific gravity (USG) were also measured. RESULTS: Sweat metrics between the outdoor and indoor environment were significantly different (p < .05) in absolute SR (1.62 ± 0.18 L · h-1, 1.17 ± 0.13 L · h-1; p < .002), SR relative to body mass (24.84 ± 2.58 ml · kg-1 · h-1, 17.95 ± 1.41 ml · kg-1 · h-1; p < .003), SR relative to fat-free mass (29.92 ± 2.42 ml · kg-1 · h-1, 19.44 ± 1.73 ml · kg-1 · h-1; p < .001), and regional sweat [Na+] (1672.50 ± 500.27 ppm, 1212.50 ± 288.04 ppm; p < .02), respectively. There was a significant difference in USG (p < .04) in the outdoor environment (1.007 ± .003 units) and the indoor environment (1.023 ± .013 units). There was also a significant correlation in SR relative to body mass and whole-body sweat (WBS) [Na+] for the outdoor and indoor environments (1298.74 ± 306.96 ppm, 1099.98 ± 260.54 ppm) (r2 > .65) respectively, as well as SR relative to body surface area and WBS [Na+] for both environments (r2 > .65). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise in a warmer outdoor environment is associated with a higher SR and sweat [Na+] compared to an indoor environment. The correlation between SR and WBS [Na+] paired with the difference in SR found between the testing environments suggests that sodium loss from exercise may follow an exponential trend in response to increasing temperature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054416.01091.d0
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect Of Different Exercise Environments On Sweat Metrics In Cross-country Athletes

Brent Alumbaugh, Reese Fledderjohn, Gilon Dierks
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Effect Of Different Exercise Environments On Sweat Metrics In Cross-country Athletes

Brent Alumbaugh, Reese Fledderjohn, Gilon Dierks
article en

Abstract

: Sweat rate (SR) and sodium loss from exercise have been shown to vary between individuals. Previous research has focused on developing normative data without accounting for environmental factors that may influence sweat metrics. Thus, the current study investigated the impact of different environmental conditions on sweat metrics in a homogenous group. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of different exercise environments on SR and sweat sodium concentration ([Na+]) during a prolonged low-intensity exercise in male DII cross-country runners. METHODS: Four male collegiate cross-country runners performed a 50-minute low-intensity exercise protocol (7:00-7:30 per mile running pace) on an outdoor track (25.6 °C, 11% humidity) and in an indoor gym (21.1 °C, 29% humidity). SR was calculated from pre- to post-exercise change in body mass. A sweat patch was used to measure regional sweat [Na+]. Height, body composition, and urine specific gravity (USG) were also measured. RESULTS: Sweat metrics between the outdoor and indoor environment were significantly different (p < .05) in absolute SR (1.62 ± 0.18 L · h-1, 1.17 ± 0.13 L · h-1; p < .002), SR relative to body mass (24.84 ± 2.58 ml · kg-1 · h-1, 17.95 ± 1.41 ml · kg-1 · h-1; p < .003), SR relative to fat-free mass (29.92 ± 2.42 ml · kg-1 · h-1, 19.44 ± 1.73 ml · kg-1 · h-1; p < .001), and regional sweat [Na+] (1672.50 ± 500.27 ppm, 1212.50 ± 288.04 ppm; p < .02), respectively. There was a significant difference in USG (p < .04) in the outdoor environment (1.007 ± .003 units) and the indoor environment (1.023 ± .013 units). There was also a significant correlation in SR relative to body mass and whole-body sweat (WBS) [Na+] for the outdoor and indoor environments (1298.74 ± 306.96 ppm, 1099.98 ± 260.54 ppm) (r2 > .65) respectively, as well as SR relative to body surface area and WBS [Na+] for both environments (r2 > .65). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise in a warmer outdoor environment is associated with a higher SR and sweat [Na+] compared to an indoor environment. The correlation between SR and WBS [Na+] paired with the difference in SR found between the testing environments suggests that sodium loss from exercise may follow an exponential trend in response to increasing temperature.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Colorado Mesa University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.