Impact Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness On Markers Of Cardiovascular Disease Among Law Enforcement Officers

Law enforcement officers (LEO) have heightened cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk due to the stressful nature of their occupations. The prevalence of CVD among LEO is 1.7 times higher compared to that of the general public. Higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels (VO2max) are associated with lower oxidative stress and inflammatory markers, as well as lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, there is a lack of data examining this relationship among law enforcement officers (LEO). PURPOSE: To examine differences in markers of CVD risk between LEO classified as having either high or low levels of CRF. METHODS: Seventy-three career male and female LEO completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPXT), where VO2max was estimated from the Foster equation. Fasted blood samples were taken to assess traditional and non-traditional CVD risk biomarkers: high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), cortisol, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Body fat percentage (BF%) was determined via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), VO2max values were categorized based on American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines to establish a high-fitness (HF) group (n = 25) and a low fitness (LF) group (n = 23). Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess normality. Independent sample T-tests or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests (if normality was violated) were used to assess differences in CVD risk biomarkers, fitness, and body composition between LEO categorized as HF and LF. Effect sizes were calculated as Cohen’s d (i.e., small [0.2-0.5], medium [0.5-0.8], large [> 0.8]). RESULTS: Participants classified as HF had significantly (p < 0.001) higher VO2max (HF: 38.5 ml/kg/min; LF: 32.4 ml/kg/min, d = 1.30) and CPXT exercise times (HF: 11.05 min; LF: 9.54 min; d = 1.28). In addition, the HF group had significantly (p = 0.029) higher HDL concentrations (HF: 58.3 mg/dL; LF: 46.9 mg/dL; d = 0.65). While not statistically significant (p = 0.052), the LF group had greater fat mass compared to the HF group (HF: 57.3 lbs.; 48.3 lbs.; d = -0.576). CONCLUSION: Given the cardioprotective benefits of higher HDL concentrations, these findings support cardiometabolic benefits of having higher fitness levels among LEO. Support for research reported in this abstract was provided by the Translational Health Research Center at Texas State University.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060132.13092.42
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness On Markers Of Cardiovascular Disease Among Law Enforcement Officers

Lisa C. Colvin, M. Hunter Martaindale, Matthew J. McAllister, Drew Edward Gonzalez et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Impact Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness On Markers Of Cardiovascular Disease Among Law Enforcement Officers

Lisa C. Colvin, M. Hunter Martaindale, Matthew J. McAllister, Drew Edward Gonzalez, Lucia S. Creeden, Steve Martin
article en

Abstract

Law enforcement officers (LEO) have heightened cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk due to the stressful nature of their occupations. The prevalence of CVD among LEO is 1.7 times higher compared to that of the general public. Higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels (VO2max) are associated with lower oxidative stress and inflammatory markers, as well as lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, there is a lack of data examining this relationship among law enforcement officers (LEO). PURPOSE: To examine differences in markers of CVD risk between LEO classified as having either high or low levels of CRF. METHODS: Seventy-three career male and female LEO completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPXT), where VO2max was estimated from the Foster equation. Fasted blood samples were taken to assess traditional and non-traditional CVD risk biomarkers: high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), cortisol, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Body fat percentage (BF%) was determined via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), VO2max values were categorized based on American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines to establish a high-fitness (HF) group (n = 25) and a low fitness (LF) group (n = 23). Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess normality. Independent sample T-tests or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests (if normality was violated) were used to assess differences in CVD risk biomarkers, fitness, and body composition between LEO categorized as HF and LF. Effect sizes were calculated as Cohen’s d (i.e., small [0.2-0.5], medium [0.5-0.8], large [> 0.8]). RESULTS: Participants classified as HF had significantly (p < 0.001) higher VO2max (HF: 38.5 ml/kg/min; LF: 32.4 ml/kg/min, d = 1.30) and CPXT exercise times (HF: 11.05 min; LF: 9.54 min; d = 1.28). In addition, the HF group had significantly (p = 0.029) higher HDL concentrations (HF: 58.3 mg/dL; LF: 46.9 mg/dL; d = 0.65). While not statistically significant (p = 0.052), the LF group had greater fat mass compared to the HF group (HF: 57.3 lbs.; 48.3 lbs.; d = -0.576). CONCLUSION: Given the cardioprotective benefits of higher HDL concentrations, these findings support cardiometabolic benefits of having higher fitness levels among LEO. Support for research reported in this abstract was provided by the Translational Health Research Center at Texas State University.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Texas State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.