Comparing The Effect Of N-95 Vs Surgical Mask Use On Resting Metabolic Data Changes

Face masks reduce the spread of viral respiratory particles, however, their impact on respiratory physiology requires further research. Previous studies reported negative changes in gas exchange data when wearing a surgical mask, however, breath-by-breath data has not been analyzed. PURPOSE: To compare physiological changes when wearing an N95 mask and surgical mask at rest. Variables measured include oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide ventilation (VC02), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation (MV), and discomfort. METHODS: 42 subjects ages 18-55 (19 men; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Exclusion criteria was a history of metabolic disease/claustrophobia. Respiratory and metabolic data was collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. RR was recorded via a smart skin apparatus for breath-by-breath data. Testing consisted of three 15-minute trials: no mask, N-95 mask, and a surgical mask. HR, VO2, VC02, RER, RR and MV were recorded at 1-minute intervals. Discomfort was assessed using a Likert scale. Results were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: VCO2 was significantly lower in surgical masks when compared to the control (p = .05). Both surgical and N95 masks had significantly lower RERs (p < .001, p < .005). MV was higher in N95 and surgical conditions, but only significant in N95 (p < .001). RR was not significantly different across conditions (p = .102). Subjects reported the most discomfort wearing the N95 mask (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Variance in gas exchange data suggests alterations in respiratory efficiency and metabolic rate while using face masks. This is supported by the significant decrease in RER with both masks, indicating a shift in substrate preference towards fat metabolism. While there were no significant differences in RR, MV was increased, suggesting compensation for altered gas exchange. This may account for the increased discomfort associated with mask use, particularly with N95s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060640.61715.22
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing The Effect Of N-95 Vs Surgical Mask Use On Resting Metabolic Data Changes

Joanne DiFrancisco‐Donoghue, Alexander Rothstein, Amerigo Rossi, Alyssa Hillian et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Comparing The Effect Of N-95 Vs Surgical Mask Use On Resting Metabolic Data Changes

Joanne DiFrancisco‐Donoghue, Alexander Rothstein, Amerigo Rossi, Alyssa Hillian, Robert Steinberg, Bernie Acevedo
article en

Abstract

Face masks reduce the spread of viral respiratory particles, however, their impact on respiratory physiology requires further research. Previous studies reported negative changes in gas exchange data when wearing a surgical mask, however, breath-by-breath data has not been analyzed. PURPOSE: To compare physiological changes when wearing an N95 mask and surgical mask at rest. Variables measured include oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide ventilation (VC02), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation (MV), and discomfort. METHODS: 42 subjects ages 18-55 (19 men; age 22.98 ± 3.83) were recruited. Exclusion criteria was a history of metabolic disease/claustrophobia. Respiratory and metabolic data was collected using indirect calorimetry under a hood. RR was recorded via a smart skin apparatus for breath-by-breath data. Testing consisted of three 15-minute trials: no mask, N-95 mask, and a surgical mask. HR, VO2, VC02, RER, RR and MV were recorded at 1-minute intervals. Discomfort was assessed using a Likert scale. Results were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: VCO2 was significantly lower in surgical masks when compared to the control (p = .05). Both surgical and N95 masks had significantly lower RERs (p < .001, p < .005). MV was higher in N95 and surgical conditions, but only significant in N95 (p < .001). RR was not significantly different across conditions (p = .102). Subjects reported the most discomfort wearing the N95 mask (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Variance in gas exchange data suggests alterations in respiratory efficiency and metabolic rate while using face masks. This is supported by the significant decrease in RER with both masks, indicating a shift in substrate preference towards fat metabolism. While there were no significant differences in RR, MV was increased, suggesting compensation for altered gas exchange. This may account for the increased discomfort associated with mask use, particularly with N95s.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
New York Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.