Both Exercise And Socialization Influence Acute Changes In Mood Parameters

PURPOSE: Mood is correlated with exercise; with even acute bouts of exercise improving mood profiles. However, many factors may influence mood. It has been observed that those exercising in groups >3 individuals over 12 weeks experienced greater mood-related benefits than those training in smaller groups (≤3 individuals), raising a question of how socialization influences the mood-related benefits of exercise. Monitoring training rather than acute effects may obfuscate other confounding variables within participants’ lives. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess how exercise and/or socialization acutely influence mood. METHODS: Healthy participants (18-45 years old) were recruited from CUNY college campuses. After assessing VO2max, participants completed all sessions: no-exercise / no-socialization, no-exercise with socialization, exercise / no-socialization, or exercise with socialization; in a randomized order. Exercise was performed on a treadmill, with sessions lasting 30 minutes followed by a 10-minute recovery period. Control sessions were sedentary, but matched for duration. During exercise, participants maintained their heart rate (HR) within five beats-per-minute of 50% of their HR reserve. Before and after each study session, participants completed a Profile Of Mood States and State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Repeated measures ANOVA were used to study main effects of Exercise and Socialization. RESULTS: There were significant differences in HR between exercise and control sessions (p < 0.001) with no significant difference between socialization and no-socialization sessions (p = 0.108). There were significant decreases in hostility following both exercise ~6% (p = 0.012) and socialization ~6% (p = 0.012), with a significant interaction (p = 0.011). Confusion was significantly decreased following socialization ~1% (p = 0.025), but not exercise (p = 0.072). There were significant reductions in total mood disturbance and anxiety following exercise ~2 & 1% (p = 0.033, p < 0.01) and/or socialization ~1 & 1% (p = 0.018, p < 0.01), with a significant interaction (p = 0.019, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it appears that exercise and socialization both acutely influence mood. However, exercise alone, or socialization alone, may not provide the same mood benefits of including both.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001055300.60684.eb
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Both Exercise And Socialization Influence Acute Changes In Mood Parameters

Jane Ekhtman, Douglas J. Oberlin, Emmanuel Egwuonwu, Kristine Sabo et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Both Exercise And Socialization Influence Acute Changes In Mood Parameters

Jane Ekhtman, Douglas J. Oberlin, Emmanuel Egwuonwu, Kristine Sabo, Ángela Veras, Andy Fernandez, Elizabeth Arias
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mood is correlated with exercise; with even acute bouts of exercise improving mood profiles. However, many factors may influence mood. It has been observed that those exercising in groups >3 individuals over 12 weeks experienced greater mood-related benefits than those training in smaller groups (≤3 individuals), raising a question of how socialization influences the mood-related benefits of exercise. Monitoring training rather than acute effects may obfuscate other confounding variables within participants’ lives. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess how exercise and/or socialization acutely influence mood. METHODS: Healthy participants (18-45 years old) were recruited from CUNY college campuses. After assessing VO2max, participants completed all sessions: no-exercise / no-socialization, no-exercise with socialization, exercise / no-socialization, or exercise with socialization; in a randomized order. Exercise was performed on a treadmill, with sessions lasting 30 minutes followed by a 10-minute recovery period. Control sessions were sedentary, but matched for duration. During exercise, participants maintained their heart rate (HR) within five beats-per-minute of 50% of their HR reserve. Before and after each study session, participants completed a Profile Of Mood States and State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Repeated measures ANOVA were used to study main effects of Exercise and Socialization. RESULTS: There were significant differences in HR between exercise and control sessions (p < 0.001) with no significant difference between socialization and no-socialization sessions (p = 0.108). There were significant decreases in hostility following both exercise ~6% (p = 0.012) and socialization ~6% (p = 0.012), with a significant interaction (p = 0.011). Confusion was significantly decreased following socialization ~1% (p = 0.025), but not exercise (p = 0.072). There were significant reductions in total mood disturbance and anxiety following exercise ~2 & 1% (p = 0.033, p < 0.01) and/or socialization ~1 & 1% (p = 0.018, p < 0.01), with a significant interaction (p = 0.019, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, it appears that exercise and socialization both acutely influence mood. However, exercise alone, or socialization alone, may not provide the same mood benefits of including both.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
City College of New York (US), Lehman College (US), Hunter College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.