Powered Pneumatic Knee Exoskeleton Affects Gait Parameters And Kinematics During 2-mile March

Soldiers are at a high risk of knee injury, with a large proportion of these due to the excessive weights they carry, with marching loads reaching up to 80% of body weight (BW). Exoskeletons are wearable assistive devices that reduce the biological work performed by a joint. Military research has investigated the use of exoskeletons to reduce loads and increase performance. However, the effects of knee exoskeletons on gait parameters and lower extremality (LE) kinematics during loaded marching are unknown. PURPOSE: Determine the effects of a pneumatic knee exoskeleton on Soldiers’ gait parameters and LE kinematics during a 2-mile loaded march. METHODS: 9 healthy Soldiers (8 m/1f) performed a 2-mile march at a self-selected speed, wearing 30% BW, with and without the knee exoskeleton. Participants completed a familiarization day with the exoskeleton to determine march speed. Visits were randomized and counter balanced (i.e., with (Exo) and without (NoExo) the exoskeleton). Inertial measurement units were placed on the feet, shanks, thighs, and pelvis to measure gait parameters; this included spatiotemporal variables, range of motion (ROM) and peak angles for hip/knee/ankle during stance (ST) and swing (SW) phases. Paired t-tests were used to compare Exo and NoExo conditions. RESULTS: Stride length increased with the exoskeleton (Exo: 149.8 ± 4.3 cm, NoExo: 144.6 ± 4.1 cm, p = .02), along with the percent of time spent in double stance (Exo: 27.5 ± .8%, NoExo: 26.1 ± 0.9%, p = 0.01). The Exo showed a higher percent of time spent in stance vs. swing for the left (ST Exo: 63.8 ± .5%, ST NoExo: 62.9 ± .5%, p = .02) and right (ST Exo: 63.9 ± .4%, ST NoExo: 63.1 ± .4%, p = .01) legs. Finally, the Exo showed higher left ST hip ROM in the sagittal plane (Exo: 51.2 ± 2.5, NoExo: 46.9 ± 2.4, p = .02) and average right knee flexion during swing (Exo: 38.4 ± 2.0, NoExo: 44.3 ± 2.5, p = .04). All remaining comparisons were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Use of the Exo showed changes on Soldiers gait parameters, indicating there may be an effect on energy expenditure and performance. However, a direct effect can not be concluded at this time. LE kinematics were largely unaffected using the Exo. Supported by MO21500/MO210170. The opinions expressed are the authors' and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or Department of Defense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060240.74448.13
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Powered Pneumatic Knee Exoskeleton Affects Gait Parameters And Kinematics During 2-mile March

Takashi Nagai, Cole Dempsey, Caleb D. Johnson, Lucas C. Sarantos et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Powered Pneumatic Knee Exoskeleton Affects Gait Parameters And Kinematics During 2-mile March

Takashi Nagai, Cole Dempsey, Caleb D. Johnson, Lucas C. Sarantos, C Borden, Venessa J. Ramirez
article en

Abstract

Soldiers are at a high risk of knee injury, with a large proportion of these due to the excessive weights they carry, with marching loads reaching up to 80% of body weight (BW). Exoskeletons are wearable assistive devices that reduce the biological work performed by a joint. Military research has investigated the use of exoskeletons to reduce loads and increase performance. However, the effects of knee exoskeletons on gait parameters and lower extremality (LE) kinematics during loaded marching are unknown. PURPOSE: Determine the effects of a pneumatic knee exoskeleton on Soldiers’ gait parameters and LE kinematics during a 2-mile loaded march. METHODS: 9 healthy Soldiers (8 m/1f) performed a 2-mile march at a self-selected speed, wearing 30% BW, with and without the knee exoskeleton. Participants completed a familiarization day with the exoskeleton to determine march speed. Visits were randomized and counter balanced (i.e., with (Exo) and without (NoExo) the exoskeleton). Inertial measurement units were placed on the feet, shanks, thighs, and pelvis to measure gait parameters; this included spatiotemporal variables, range of motion (ROM) and peak angles for hip/knee/ankle during stance (ST) and swing (SW) phases. Paired t-tests were used to compare Exo and NoExo conditions. RESULTS: Stride length increased with the exoskeleton (Exo: 149.8 ± 4.3 cm, NoExo: 144.6 ± 4.1 cm, p = .02), along with the percent of time spent in double stance (Exo: 27.5 ± .8%, NoExo: 26.1 ± 0.9%, p = 0.01). The Exo showed a higher percent of time spent in stance vs. swing for the left (ST Exo: 63.8 ± .5%, ST NoExo: 62.9 ± .5%, p = .02) and right (ST Exo: 63.9 ± .4%, ST NoExo: 63.1 ± .4%, p = .01) legs. Finally, the Exo showed higher left ST hip ROM in the sagittal plane (Exo: 51.2 ± 2.5, NoExo: 46.9 ± 2.4, p = .02) and average right knee flexion during swing (Exo: 38.4 ± 2.0, NoExo: 44.3 ± 2.5, p = .04). All remaining comparisons were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: Use of the Exo showed changes on Soldiers gait parameters, indicating there may be an effect on energy expenditure and performance. However, a direct effect can not be concluded at this time. LE kinematics were largely unaffected using the Exo. Supported by MO21500/MO210170. The opinions expressed are the authors' and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or Department of Defense.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US), United States Army (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.