Can Sacubitril-valsartan Improve Locomotor Muscle Microvascular Function In Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) exhibit locomotor muscle microvascular dysfunction. Sacubitril-valsartan is a recently approved, first-in-class, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor that reduces the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with HFrEF. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of sacubitril-valsartan to improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with HFrEF, but its effect on locomotor muscle microvascular function remains unknown. PURPOSE: We sought to test the hypothesis that short-term treatment with sacubitril-valsartan would improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Patients with NYHA Class II-III HFrEF (n = 6; age: 70 ± 9 years; BMI: 28 ± 3 kg/m2; ejection fraction: 27 ± 9%) were studied prior to initiation (baseline) and at months 1, 2, and 3 of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan. Locomotor muscle microvascular function was assessed as leg blood flow (LBF) and leg vascular conductance (LVC) responses to passive leg movement (PLM) and were expressed as peak change (Δpeak) and total hyperemic response (area under the curve above rest; AUC). RESULTS: Sacubitril-valsartan did not improve LBFΔpeak (baseline: 421 ± 92 mL/min; 1-month: 463 ± 222 mL/min; 2-month: 469 ± 164 mL/min; 3-month: 445 ± 151 mL/min, p = 0.887) or LVCΔpeak (baseline: 493 ± 150 mL/min/100 mmHg; 1-month: 632 ± 393 mL/min/100 mmHg; 2-month: 654 ± 252 mL/min/100 mmHg; 3-month: 609 ± 219 mL/min/100 mmHg, p = 0.382). Likewise, sacubitril-valsartan did not improve LBFAUC (baseline: Δ172 ± 68 mL; 1-month: Δ170 ± 97 mL; 2-month: Δ182 ± 72 mL; 3-month: Δ212 ± 115 mL, p = 0.582) or LVCAUC (baseline: Δ198 ± 99 mL/100 mmHg; 1-month: Δ218 ± 156 mL/100 mmHg; 2-month: Δ233 ± 107 mL/100 mmHg; 3-month: Δ270 ± 167 mL/100 mmHg, p = 0.568). CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril-valsartan does not appear to improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFrEF. These initial findings suggest that the beneficial effect of this drug on upper limb conduit artery function reported previously may not extend to the microcirculation of an ambulatory muscle group, highlighting a heterogeneous efficacy across different regions of the peripheral vasculature. NIH, VA, and AHA

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001052792.44407.91
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Sacubitril-valsartan Improve Locomotor Muscle Microvascular Function In Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Adam S. Smith, David Walter Wray, Stephen M. Ratchford, Kanokwan Bunsawat et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Can Sacubitril-valsartan Improve Locomotor Muscle Microvascular Function In Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Adam S. Smith, David Walter Wray, Stephen M. Ratchford, Kanokwan Bunsawat, Jarred J. Iacovelli, Josef Stehlik, Jeremy K. Alpenglow, Soung Hun Park, Catherine L. Jarrett
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) exhibit locomotor muscle microvascular dysfunction. Sacubitril-valsartan is a recently approved, first-in-class, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor that reduces the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with HFrEF. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of sacubitril-valsartan to improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with HFrEF, but its effect on locomotor muscle microvascular function remains unknown. PURPOSE: We sought to test the hypothesis that short-term treatment with sacubitril-valsartan would improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Patients with NYHA Class II-III HFrEF (n = 6; age: 70 ± 9 years; BMI: 28 ± 3 kg/m2; ejection fraction: 27 ± 9%) were studied prior to initiation (baseline) and at months 1, 2, and 3 of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan. Locomotor muscle microvascular function was assessed as leg blood flow (LBF) and leg vascular conductance (LVC) responses to passive leg movement (PLM) and were expressed as peak change (Δpeak) and total hyperemic response (area under the curve above rest; AUC). RESULTS: Sacubitril-valsartan did not improve LBFΔpeak (baseline: 421 ± 92 mL/min; 1-month: 463 ± 222 mL/min; 2-month: 469 ± 164 mL/min; 3-month: 445 ± 151 mL/min, p = 0.887) or LVCΔpeak (baseline: 493 ± 150 mL/min/100 mmHg; 1-month: 632 ± 393 mL/min/100 mmHg; 2-month: 654 ± 252 mL/min/100 mmHg; 3-month: 609 ± 219 mL/min/100 mmHg, p = 0.382). Likewise, sacubitril-valsartan did not improve LBFAUC (baseline: Δ172 ± 68 mL; 1-month: Δ170 ± 97 mL; 2-month: Δ182 ± 72 mL; 3-month: Δ212 ± 115 mL, p = 0.582) or LVCAUC (baseline: Δ198 ± 99 mL/100 mmHg; 1-month: Δ218 ± 156 mL/100 mmHg; 2-month: Δ233 ± 107 mL/100 mmHg; 3-month: Δ270 ± 167 mL/100 mmHg, p = 0.568). CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril-valsartan does not appear to improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFrEF. These initial findings suggest that the beneficial effect of this drug on upper limb conduit artery function reported previously may not extend to the microcirculation of an ambulatory muscle group, highlighting a heterogeneous efficacy across different regions of the peripheral vasculature. NIH, VA, and AHA

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Utah (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.