Effects Of Cognitive Or Manual Dual-tasks On Dynamic Gait Stability During Stair Descent

Stair negotiation is an activity of daily life with the potential for falls. Falls on stairs account for 26% of all self-reported falls and are one of the leading causes of accidental death. The effects of a concurrent cognitive or manual dual-task paradigm on dynamic gait stability (DGS) during stair descent remain uncertain. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of concurrent cognitive or manual dual-tasks on dynamic gait stability. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young women participated this study (age: 21.6 ± 2.1 years; height: 162.4 ± 4.7 cm; body mass: 53.4 ± 6.7 kg) and descended a staircase under three different walking conditions: descend stairs only (single task, ST), descend stairs while subtracting serial threes from a three-digit number (cognitive dual-task, CT), and descend stairs while carrying a glass of water (manual dual-task, MT). An eight-camera motion capture system synchronized with a force plate was used to collect kinematic data and ground reaction forces at 100 Hz and 1000 Hz, respectively. Gait velocity, along with center of mass (COM)-center of pressure (COP) inclination angle (IA) in anterior/posterior (ap) and medial/lateral (ml) directions were used to represent DGS. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures was employed to compare the IAs of the three conditions. RESULTS: Peak velocities under CT (p = 0.003) and MT dual-task conditions were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that under ST condition (CT: 0.79 ± 0.09 m/s; MT: 0.68 ± 0.08 m/s; ST: 0.91 ± 0.11 m/s). The peak of the IAA/P under the CT and MT conditions was lower (p < 0.02) than under the ST condition (CT: 8.29 ± 0.82°; MT: 7.16 ± 0.89°; ST: 9.05 ± 0.79°), and the peak of the IAA/P under MT was lower (p < 0.001) than under CT condition. The peak of the IAM/L under MT was lower (p = 0.02) than that under ST condition (MT: 5.95 ± 1.02°; ST: 6.49 ± 0.53°).: CONCLUSIONS: Compared to single-task, healthy young women have worse DGS and lower gait velocity under cognitive and manual dual-task conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054708.37945.5e
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Cognitive Or Manual Dual-tasks On Dynamic Gait Stability During Stair Descent

Qipeng Song, Li Li, Yubin Ge
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Effects Of Cognitive Or Manual Dual-tasks On Dynamic Gait Stability During Stair Descent

Qipeng Song, Li Li, Yubin Ge
article en

Abstract

Stair negotiation is an activity of daily life with the potential for falls. Falls on stairs account for 26% of all self-reported falls and are one of the leading causes of accidental death. The effects of a concurrent cognitive or manual dual-task paradigm on dynamic gait stability (DGS) during stair descent remain uncertain. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of concurrent cognitive or manual dual-tasks on dynamic gait stability. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young women participated this study (age: 21.6 ± 2.1 years; height: 162.4 ± 4.7 cm; body mass: 53.4 ± 6.7 kg) and descended a staircase under three different walking conditions: descend stairs only (single task, ST), descend stairs while subtracting serial threes from a three-digit number (cognitive dual-task, CT), and descend stairs while carrying a glass of water (manual dual-task, MT). An eight-camera motion capture system synchronized with a force plate was used to collect kinematic data and ground reaction forces at 100 Hz and 1000 Hz, respectively. Gait velocity, along with center of mass (COM)-center of pressure (COP) inclination angle (IA) in anterior/posterior (ap) and medial/lateral (ml) directions were used to represent DGS. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures was employed to compare the IAs of the three conditions. RESULTS: Peak velocities under CT (p = 0.003) and MT dual-task conditions were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that under ST condition (CT: 0.79 ± 0.09 m/s; MT: 0.68 ± 0.08 m/s; ST: 0.91 ± 0.11 m/s). The peak of the IAA/P under the CT and MT conditions was lower (p < 0.02) than under the ST condition (CT: 8.29 ± 0.82°; MT: 7.16 ± 0.89°; ST: 9.05 ± 0.79°), and the peak of the IAA/P under MT was lower (p < 0.001) than under CT condition. The peak of the IAM/L under MT was lower (p = 0.02) than that under ST condition (MT: 5.95 ± 1.02°; ST: 6.49 ± 0.53°).: CONCLUSIONS: Compared to single-task, healthy young women have worse DGS and lower gait velocity under cognitive and manual dual-task conditions.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Georgia Southern University (US), Shandong Sport University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.