Effects Of Indoor Or Outdoor Moderately Heavy Superset Resistance Training On Pulmonary Measures

The American College of Sports Medicine has determined that resistance training (RT) and outdoor activities are two of the top ten worldwide fitness trends for 2023. We previously found that RT outdoors (OUT) had reduced perception of effort than indoor RT (IN), despite no physiological differences in heart rate or energy expenditure. It is unknown whether these findings extend to respiratory values, and as such, pulmonary measures need to be evaluated. PURPOSE:To assess whether indoor or outdoor environments effect pulmonary responses. METHODS: Twenty-three adult participants completed the study (n = 10 female, n = 13 male; age: 26.1 ± 8.8 yrs; height: 172.2 ± 9.5 cm; mass: 73.4 ± 18.7 kg; RT experience: 5.3 ± 4.8 yrs). Participants were all equipped with a COSMED K5 wearable metabolic system attached through a harness securely on the back. Outcome measures included ventilation (VE [L/min]), tidal volume (VT [L]), and respiratory frequency (Rf [breaths per min]). Randomly in indoor and outdoor settings, participants completed 4 supersets of the reverse lunge and shoulder press exercises. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test with significance accepted at p < 0.05. Effect size was determined by Cohen’s d, with interpretation of small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5) and large (d = 0.8). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for VE (IN = 45.0 ± 15.8; OUT = 47.1 ± 16.5 L/min, p = 0.021, d = 0.13 [small]). However, there were no differences observed for VT (IN = 1.7 ± 0.6 vs. OUT = 1.7 ± 0.7 L, p = 0.30, d = 0.157 [small]) and Rf (IN = 27.9 ± 5.8 vs. OUT = 28.8 ± 6.2 breaths per min, p = 0.24, d = 0.16 [small]). CONCLUSIONS: Exercising outdoors at the same intensity has no effect on some pulmonary measures (VT, Rf) but has an effect on others (VE). Increased pulmonary ventilation occurs in outdoor versus treadmill running, and the present findings extend this observation to RT. Future studies should be designed to determine the underlying mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001052728.83158.15
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects Of Indoor Or Outdoor Moderately Heavy Superset Resistance Training On Pulmonary Measures

Devin M. Green, Marcus M. Lawrence, Merrill D. Funk, Jeffrey C. Cowley et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effects Of Indoor Or Outdoor Moderately Heavy Superset Resistance Training On Pulmonary Measures

Devin M. Green, Marcus M. Lawrence, Merrill D. Funk, Jeffrey C. Cowley, Bryson Carrier, James W. Navalta, Charli D. Aguilar, Setareh Zarei, Amanda Hawkes, Alexandra Routsis, Jae K. Bovell, Kathryn A. Lavin, Talon Thornton, S Maxwell, Aaron McKenzie, Wesley Ziegler, Korina Ziegler
article en

Abstract

The American College of Sports Medicine has determined that resistance training (RT) and outdoor activities are two of the top ten worldwide fitness trends for 2023. We previously found that RT outdoors (OUT) had reduced perception of effort than indoor RT (IN), despite no physiological differences in heart rate or energy expenditure. It is unknown whether these findings extend to respiratory values, and as such, pulmonary measures need to be evaluated. PURPOSE:To assess whether indoor or outdoor environments effect pulmonary responses. METHODS: Twenty-three adult participants completed the study (n = 10 female, n = 13 male; age: 26.1 ± 8.8 yrs; height: 172.2 ± 9.5 cm; mass: 73.4 ± 18.7 kg; RT experience: 5.3 ± 4.8 yrs). Participants were all equipped with a COSMED K5 wearable metabolic system attached through a harness securely on the back. Outcome measures included ventilation (VE [L/min]), tidal volume (VT [L]), and respiratory frequency (Rf [breaths per min]). Randomly in indoor and outdoor settings, participants completed 4 supersets of the reverse lunge and shoulder press exercises. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test with significance accepted at p < 0.05. Effect size was determined by Cohen’s d, with interpretation of small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5) and large (d = 0.8). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for VE (IN = 45.0 ± 15.8; OUT = 47.1 ± 16.5 L/min, p = 0.021, d = 0.13 [small]). However, there were no differences observed for VT (IN = 1.7 ± 0.6 vs. OUT = 1.7 ± 0.7 L, p = 0.30, d = 0.157 [small]) and Rf (IN = 27.9 ± 5.8 vs. OUT = 28.8 ± 6.2 breaths per min, p = 0.24, d = 0.16 [small]). CONCLUSIONS: Exercising outdoors at the same intensity has no effect on some pulmonary measures (VT, Rf) but has an effect on others (VE). Increased pulmonary ventilation occurs in outdoor versus treadmill running, and the present findings extend this observation to RT. Future studies should be designed to determine the underlying mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Southern Utah University (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.