The Effects Of Isometric Vs. Plyometric Exercises On Throwing Velocity In Handball Players

While there are available literature describing the effects of diverse warm-up protocols on throwing velocity in different sports, there are no studies comparing the effects of plyometric and isometric exercises on handball throwing velocity. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of two warm-up protocols including plyometric vs. isometric exercises on throwing velocity in handball players. METHODS: Sixteen U-22 handball male players (19.8 ± 0.9 yrs) of national level completed 3 different warm-ups (isometric [ISO] vs. plyometric [PLY] vs. control [CON]) in a randomized order over three weeks. They firstly performed a standardized warm-up (including low-intensity running plus dynamic stretching exercises of the upper and lower limbs) followed by the ISO vs. PLY vs. CON exercises. Immediately after the warm-up protocols, they were assessed three times for throwing velocity using a Doppler radar gun (Stalker, ATS II, TX, USA). The ISO protocol included 3 sets of 5 seconds at 80% of the Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction test (MVIC) for the dominant arm in a motorized electrical device (DYNA, MyoQuality®, model M1, Spain). The PLY protocol consisted of plyometric push-ups (3 sets of 4 repetitions). The CON condition included an iso-time low-intensity running bout. One-Way ANOVA with Holm-Bonferroni post hoc tests was performed to compare the 3 conditions. RESULTS: There were no differences in throwing velocity between experimental interventions (ISO and PLY) when compared to CON. Table 1 shows the comparison of the highest throwing velocity values for the conditions evaluated. Table 1. - Comparison of the throwing velocity values (mean ± SD) within and between conditions. CON (95% CI) ISO (95% CI) PLY (95% CI) CON vs. ISO CON vs. PLY ISO vs. PLY p p p Throwing velocity (km•h-1) 84.6 ± 5.3 (81.8-87.5) 83.2 ± 5.0 (80.5-85.9) 84.4 ± 5.3 (81.6-87.2) 0.436 0.847 0.393 CONCLUSION: Plyometric and isometric warm-up exercises did not improve throwing velocity, when compared to low-intensity running, in handball male players. Daniel Boullosa was supported by Grant RYC2021-031098-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, by "European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR", and by a productivity research grant (PQ1D) from CNPq (Brazil).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054408.22029.8d
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects Of Isometric Vs. Plyometric Exercises On Throwing Velocity In Handball Players

Diego Soto, Daniel Boullosa, Arthur Zecchin, Jaime Fernández-Fernández et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

The Effects Of Isometric Vs. Plyometric Exercises On Throwing Velocity In Handball Players

Diego Soto, Daniel Boullosa, Arthur Zecchin, Jaime Fernández-Fernández, Luís Santos
article en

Abstract

While there are available literature describing the effects of diverse warm-up protocols on throwing velocity in different sports, there are no studies comparing the effects of plyometric and isometric exercises on handball throwing velocity. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of two warm-up protocols including plyometric vs. isometric exercises on throwing velocity in handball players. METHODS: Sixteen U-22 handball male players (19.8 ± 0.9 yrs) of national level completed 3 different warm-ups (isometric [ISO] vs. plyometric [PLY] vs. control [CON]) in a randomized order over three weeks. They firstly performed a standardized warm-up (including low-intensity running plus dynamic stretching exercises of the upper and lower limbs) followed by the ISO vs. PLY vs. CON exercises. Immediately after the warm-up protocols, they were assessed three times for throwing velocity using a Doppler radar gun (Stalker, ATS II, TX, USA). The ISO protocol included 3 sets of 5 seconds at 80% of the Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction test (MVIC) for the dominant arm in a motorized electrical device (DYNA, MyoQuality®, model M1, Spain). The PLY protocol consisted of plyometric push-ups (3 sets of 4 repetitions). The CON condition included an iso-time low-intensity running bout. One-Way ANOVA with Holm-Bonferroni post hoc tests was performed to compare the 3 conditions. RESULTS: There were no differences in throwing velocity between experimental interventions (ISO and PLY) when compared to CON. Table 1 shows the comparison of the highest throwing velocity values for the conditions evaluated. Table 1. - Comparison of the throwing velocity values (mean ± SD) within and between conditions. CON (95% CI) ISO (95% CI) PLY (95% CI) CON vs. ISO CON vs. PLY ISO vs. PLY p p p Throwing velocity (km•h-1) 84.6 ± 5.3 (81.8-87.5) 83.2 ± 5.0 (80.5-85.9) 84.4 ± 5.3 (81.6-87.2) 0.436 0.847 0.393 CONCLUSION: Plyometric and isometric warm-up exercises did not improve throwing velocity, when compared to low-intensity running, in handball male players. Daniel Boullosa was supported by Grant RYC2021-031098-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, by "European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR", and by a productivity research grant (PQ1D) from CNPq (Brazil).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Universidad de León (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.