Influence Of Body Weight Support On Physiological Responses During Lateral And Forward Locomotion

Lower body positive pressure treadmills are designed to provide an upward directed force to the user. This body weight support (BWS) mechanism effectively reduces body weight. Using different directions of locomotion are common in training and rehabilitation setting, but there is limited research on the physiological responses of lateral locomotion and no research on the influence of BWS on physiological responses during lateral locomotion. PURPOSE: To investigate the physiological responses during lateral and forward locomotion with different levels of BWS at self-selected paces (Lateral 0%BWS 1.4 ± 0.2 m/s, 20%BWS 1.5 ± 0.2 m/s, 50%BWS 2.0 ± 0.3 m/s; Forward 0%BWS 2.7 ± 0.3 m/s, 20%BWS 3.0 ± 0.5 m/s, 50%BWS 3.2 ± 0.7 m/s). METHODS: Participants (n = 8; 25.6 ± 5.4 years) completed lateral and forward treadmill locomotion conditions with 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS. Prior to testing, the self-selected speed was determined for each direction-BWS combination. Physiological responses were collected during 3-minute conditions. The rate of oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide exhaled (VCO2) were each averaged over the last 1-min. VO2 and VCO2 were each analyzed using a 2 (direction) x 3 (BWS) repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Both VO2 and VCO2 were each influenced by the interaction between BWS and direction (p < 0.05). Using planned comparisons, it was determined that at 0%BWS, VO2 during forward (32.7 ± 4.2 ml·kg-1·min-1) locomotion was greater than that during lateral (25.44 ± 4.9 ml·kg-1·min-1) locomotion (p < 0.05). Also, at 20%BWS, VO2 was greater during forward (30.1 ± 3.1 ml·kg-1·min-1) vs. lateral (23.62 ± 5.4 ml·kg-1·min-1, p < 0.05) conditions but not for 50%BWS (p > 0.05). VCO2 was greater during forward (27 ± 4.5 ml·kg-1·min-1) vs. lateral (21.3 ± 4.4 ml·kg-1·min-1) for 0%BWS (p < 0.05) and 20%BWS conditions (forward 24.2 ± 2.6 ml·kg-1·min-1; lateral 29.6 ± 4.9 ml·kg-1·min-1: p < 0.05) but not for 50%BWS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When speed is self-selected, the increase in BWS resulted in similar physiological responses during lateral and forward locomotion. However, when less BWS was provided, forward locomotion required a greater physiological response vs. lateral when speed was self-selected. Supported by JSPS Grant Number 20 K11336

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001059848.39117.8b
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence Of Body Weight Support On Physiological Responses During Lateral And Forward Locomotion

Kenji Masumoto, John A. Mercer, Matthew Heninger, Natalia Pravica et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Influence Of Body Weight Support On Physiological Responses During Lateral And Forward Locomotion

Kenji Masumoto, John A. Mercer, Matthew Heninger, Natalia Pravica, Katsiaryna Afanasyev, Emma Foley
article en

Abstract

Lower body positive pressure treadmills are designed to provide an upward directed force to the user. This body weight support (BWS) mechanism effectively reduces body weight. Using different directions of locomotion are common in training and rehabilitation setting, but there is limited research on the physiological responses of lateral locomotion and no research on the influence of BWS on physiological responses during lateral locomotion. PURPOSE: To investigate the physiological responses during lateral and forward locomotion with different levels of BWS at self-selected paces (Lateral 0%BWS 1.4 ± 0.2 m/s, 20%BWS 1.5 ± 0.2 m/s, 50%BWS 2.0 ± 0.3 m/s; Forward 0%BWS 2.7 ± 0.3 m/s, 20%BWS 3.0 ± 0.5 m/s, 50%BWS 3.2 ± 0.7 m/s). METHODS: Participants (n = 8; 25.6 ± 5.4 years) completed lateral and forward treadmill locomotion conditions with 0%BWS, 20%BWS, and 50%BWS. Prior to testing, the self-selected speed was determined for each direction-BWS combination. Physiological responses were collected during 3-minute conditions. The rate of oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide exhaled (VCO2) were each averaged over the last 1-min. VO2 and VCO2 were each analyzed using a 2 (direction) x 3 (BWS) repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Both VO2 and VCO2 were each influenced by the interaction between BWS and direction (p < 0.05). Using planned comparisons, it was determined that at 0%BWS, VO2 during forward (32.7 ± 4.2 ml·kg-1·min-1) locomotion was greater than that during lateral (25.44 ± 4.9 ml·kg-1·min-1) locomotion (p < 0.05). Also, at 20%BWS, VO2 was greater during forward (30.1 ± 3.1 ml·kg-1·min-1) vs. lateral (23.62 ± 5.4 ml·kg-1·min-1, p < 0.05) conditions but not for 50%BWS (p > 0.05). VCO2 was greater during forward (27 ± 4.5 ml·kg-1·min-1) vs. lateral (21.3 ± 4.4 ml·kg-1·min-1) for 0%BWS (p < 0.05) and 20%BWS conditions (forward 24.2 ± 2.6 ml·kg-1·min-1; lateral 29.6 ± 4.9 ml·kg-1·min-1: p < 0.05) but not for 50%BWS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When speed is self-selected, the increase in BWS resulted in similar physiological responses during lateral and forward locomotion. However, when less BWS was provided, forward locomotion required a greater physiological response vs. lateral when speed was self-selected. Supported by JSPS Grant Number 20 K11336

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Kyushu University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.