Does Priming Exercise Enhance Sympatholysis?

Priming exercise has been shown to enhance skeletal muscle blood flow during subsequent exercise. However, the mechanism responsible for the enhanced skeletal muscle blood flow has not been elucidated. PURPOSE: To investigate the hypothesis that heavy-intensity priming exercise would blunt sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness and enhance contraction-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction (sympatholysis). METHODS: Young females (n = 13, 21 ± 3 years) and males (n = 8; 23 ± 2 years) performed alternate-leg knee-extension exercise where work was increased in a stepwise manner from passive exercise to moderate-intensity (30% peak power output, PPO, 7 min) preceded by either no priming exercise (MOD 1), or heavy-intensity (60% PPO, 6 min) priming exercise (MOD 2). A cold pressor test (CPT was performed at rest and during MOD 1 and MOD 2. Beat-by-beat blood pressure was measured via Finometer, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated. Leg blood flow (LBF) was measured using Doppler ultrasound, and femoral vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FVC = LBF⋅MAP-1. Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was defined as the percent decrease in FVC (%αFVC) in response to the CPT. Sympatholysis was defined as the difference between the %αFVC response to the CPT at rest and during exercise. RESULTS: Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness at rest was not different (p > 0.05) between females (-45.1 ± 11.0%) and males (-40.5 ± 11.8%). During exercise, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was blunted (p < 0.05) in both females and males. However, sympatholysis was greater (p < 0.05) in females compared with males during MOD 1 (Females: 23.5 ± 9.6, Males: 13.0 ± 7.6) and MOD 2 (Females: 23.2 ± 12.9, Males: 13.4 ± 6.6). Heavy-intensity priming exercise did not alter (p > 0.05) sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness in females (MOD 1: -21.6 ± 7.7%; MOD 2: -21.9 ± 13.0%) or males (MOD 1: -27.5 ± 12.0%; MOD 2: -27.0 ± 11.1%). Sympatholysis was also unaffected (p > 0.05) by heavy-intensity priming exercise in females (MOD 1: 23.5 ± 9.6; MOD 2: 26.7 ± 9.0) and males (MOD 1: 13.0 ± 7.6; MOD 2: 13.4 ± 6.5). CONCLUSION: Heavy-intensity priming exercise did not blunt sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness or enhance functional sympatholysis during subsequent moderate-intensity exercise. NSERC Canada

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054560.67595.18
Primary Topic
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Priming Exercise Enhance Sympatholysis?

Darren S. DeLorey, Breanne S. Collison
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
article

Does Priming Exercise Enhance Sympatholysis?

Darren S. DeLorey, Breanne S. Collison
article en

Abstract

Priming exercise has been shown to enhance skeletal muscle blood flow during subsequent exercise. However, the mechanism responsible for the enhanced skeletal muscle blood flow has not been elucidated. PURPOSE: To investigate the hypothesis that heavy-intensity priming exercise would blunt sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness and enhance contraction-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction (sympatholysis). METHODS: Young females (n = 13, 21 ± 3 years) and males (n = 8; 23 ± 2 years) performed alternate-leg knee-extension exercise where work was increased in a stepwise manner from passive exercise to moderate-intensity (30% peak power output, PPO, 7 min) preceded by either no priming exercise (MOD 1), or heavy-intensity (60% PPO, 6 min) priming exercise (MOD 2). A cold pressor test (CPT was performed at rest and during MOD 1 and MOD 2. Beat-by-beat blood pressure was measured via Finometer, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated. Leg blood flow (LBF) was measured using Doppler ultrasound, and femoral vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FVC = LBF⋅MAP-1. Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was defined as the percent decrease in FVC (%αFVC) in response to the CPT. Sympatholysis was defined as the difference between the %αFVC response to the CPT at rest and during exercise. RESULTS: Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness at rest was not different (p > 0.05) between females (-45.1 ± 11.0%) and males (-40.5 ± 11.8%). During exercise, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was blunted (p < 0.05) in both females and males. However, sympatholysis was greater (p < 0.05) in females compared with males during MOD 1 (Females: 23.5 ± 9.6, Males: 13.0 ± 7.6) and MOD 2 (Females: 23.2 ± 12.9, Males: 13.4 ± 6.6). Heavy-intensity priming exercise did not alter (p > 0.05) sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness in females (MOD 1: -21.6 ± 7.7%; MOD 2: -21.9 ± 13.0%) or males (MOD 1: -27.5 ± 12.0%; MOD 2: -27.0 ± 11.1%). Sympatholysis was also unaffected (p > 0.05) by heavy-intensity priming exercise in females (MOD 1: 23.5 ± 9.6; MOD 2: 26.7 ± 9.0) and males (MOD 1: 13.0 ± 7.6; MOD 2: 13.4 ± 6.5). CONCLUSION: Heavy-intensity priming exercise did not blunt sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness or enhance functional sympatholysis during subsequent moderate-intensity exercise. NSERC Canada

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.