Comparison Of Oxygen Consumption In 4-second Sprint Interval Exercise With Varied Intensity And Rest Period

Sprint interval training (SIT) is usually performed at maximal ‘all-out’ intensities, that are 5-8-times higher than the power needed to elicit VO2peak. However, the %VO2peak associated with repeated submaximal power sprints (%Pmax), particularly when paired with varying rest periods, remains unknown. Investigating the %VO2peak in repeated submaximal power sprints is pivotal, enabling the personalization of workout routines to specific training goals. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the acute physiological responses induced by three levels of %Pmax intensities (50%, 75%, and 100% of Pmax) with three varying rest periods (15, 30, and 45-s) between thirty 4-s sprints. METHODS: Nine healthy (25 ± 4.9 yrs), recreationally active participants took part in nine trials, performing thirty 4-s sprints during cycling with inertial loading at three different intensities and rest periods, in randomized order. RESULTS: Power outputs varied across differing intensities and rest periods. At 52 ± 0.7 %Pmax and 74% ± 0.3 %Pmax, the average output was constant within the rest periods. However, the ‘all-out’ efforts revealed that 15-s rest elicited a lower (p < 0.05) %Pmax of 88 ± 9.0 %Pmax compared to 95 ± 3.9%, and 96 ± 5.7% of Pmax for 15 vs. 30, and 45-s of rest (p < 0.05). VO2 varied (p < 0.05) across all rest periods: 48 ± 11.3%, 66 ± 13.2%, 84 ± 13.5% of VO2peak for 15-s rest; 35 ± 5.8%, 45 ± 10.5%, 66 ± 12.2% VO2peak for 30-s rest; and 28 ± 6.7%, 33 ± 5.7%, 54 ± 9.8% VO2peak for 45-s rest, corresponding to intensities at 52%, 74%, and 88% of Pmax, respectively. Notably, a linear regression model identified the equation for VO2 (mL/min) = 1088.89 + 28.32(%Pmax intensity) - 38.75(rest in s) (R2 = 0.91). CONCLUSION: A wide range of VO2 responses (i.e., 28-84% VO2peak) can systematically be elicited by varying the intensity and rest period during repeated 4-s sprints cycling using inertial loading, offering valuable insights for designing personalized training regimens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061180.09035.0b
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Oxygen Consumption In 4-second Sprint Interval Exercise With Varied Intensity And Rest Period

Edward F. Coyle, Remzi Satiroglu, Jieting Wang, Christos KYRILLOU
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison Of Oxygen Consumption In 4-second Sprint Interval Exercise With Varied Intensity And Rest Period

Edward F. Coyle, Remzi Satiroglu, Jieting Wang, Christos KYRILLOU
article en

Abstract

Sprint interval training (SIT) is usually performed at maximal ‘all-out’ intensities, that are 5-8-times higher than the power needed to elicit VO2peak. However, the %VO2peak associated with repeated submaximal power sprints (%Pmax), particularly when paired with varying rest periods, remains unknown. Investigating the %VO2peak in repeated submaximal power sprints is pivotal, enabling the personalization of workout routines to specific training goals. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the acute physiological responses induced by three levels of %Pmax intensities (50%, 75%, and 100% of Pmax) with three varying rest periods (15, 30, and 45-s) between thirty 4-s sprints. METHODS: Nine healthy (25 ± 4.9 yrs), recreationally active participants took part in nine trials, performing thirty 4-s sprints during cycling with inertial loading at three different intensities and rest periods, in randomized order. RESULTS: Power outputs varied across differing intensities and rest periods. At 52 ± 0.7 %Pmax and 74% ± 0.3 %Pmax, the average output was constant within the rest periods. However, the ‘all-out’ efforts revealed that 15-s rest elicited a lower (p < 0.05) %Pmax of 88 ± 9.0 %Pmax compared to 95 ± 3.9%, and 96 ± 5.7% of Pmax for 15 vs. 30, and 45-s of rest (p < 0.05). VO2 varied (p < 0.05) across all rest periods: 48 ± 11.3%, 66 ± 13.2%, 84 ± 13.5% of VO2peak for 15-s rest; 35 ± 5.8%, 45 ± 10.5%, 66 ± 12.2% VO2peak for 30-s rest; and 28 ± 6.7%, 33 ± 5.7%, 54 ± 9.8% VO2peak for 45-s rest, corresponding to intensities at 52%, 74%, and 88% of Pmax, respectively. Notably, a linear regression model identified the equation for VO2 (mL/min) = 1088.89 + 28.32(%Pmax intensity) - 38.75(rest in s) (R2 = 0.91). CONCLUSION: A wide range of VO2 responses (i.e., 28-84% VO2peak) can systematically be elicited by varying the intensity and rest period during repeated 4-s sprints cycling using inertial loading, offering valuable insights for designing personalized training regimens.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.