Energy Absorption In The Single Leg Vertical And Horizontal Hops In Adolescents Post-acl Reconstruction

Single leg tasks, such as the single leg horizontal hop (SLHH) and single leg vertical hop (SLVH) are used to assess performance and return to sport (RTS) readiness in clinical populations. Research on the landing of the SLVH has shown equal contributions from the hip, knee and ankle while the SLHH relies mostly on the knee. Differences between the tasks have not been examined in children. PURPOSE: To examine the difference in intralimb contributions to energy absorption during landing of SLHH and SLVH post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: 9 athletes (3 female; median age 16.1 years, IRQ 1.5, range 14.9-18.4) after ACLR (median 8.3 months post-surgery, IQR 4.1, range 6.1-13.6) completed the SLVH and SLHH while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Height/distance and energy absorption (power integral) at the hip, knee and ankle were averaged across trials during landing. The percent contribution of each joint to total energy absorption was calculated. Performance, total energy absorption, and percent energy absorption at each joint were compared across tasks and between limbs. RESULTS: SLHH and SLVH distance were shorter for ACLR compared to contralateral limbs, but significant for SLVH only (1.45 vs. 1.55, 0.31 vs. 0.34, p=0.02). Total energy absorption was lower on the ACLR side for both tasks (3.3 vs. 4.1, 3.2 vs. 3.9, p≤0.004). Distribution of energy absorption differed between tasks with SLVH having greater ankle contribution (p<0.0001) and lower contributions of the hip (p=0.0002) and knee (p=0.0008). A lower percentage of energy was absorbed by the ACLR compared with contralateral knees in both tasks (p≤0.04, Fig. 1). This was compensated by a trend toward increased energy absorption at the hip in ACLR limbs (significant for the SLHH, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Intralimb contributions to energy absorption differ between the SLVH and SLHH and there is lower energy absorption and offloading of ACLR compared with contralateral limbs in both tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056508.28729.01
Primary Topic
Hops Chemistry and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Absorption In The Single Leg Vertical And Horizontal Hops In Adolescents Post-acl Reconstruction

Eva Ciccodicola, Tishya A. L. Wren, Veronica Beltran, Alison Hanson
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Hops Chemistry and Applications
article

Energy Absorption In The Single Leg Vertical And Horizontal Hops In Adolescents Post-acl Reconstruction

Eva Ciccodicola, Tishya A. L. Wren, Veronica Beltran, Alison Hanson
article en

Abstract

Single leg tasks, such as the single leg horizontal hop (SLHH) and single leg vertical hop (SLVH) are used to assess performance and return to sport (RTS) readiness in clinical populations. Research on the landing of the SLVH has shown equal contributions from the hip, knee and ankle while the SLHH relies mostly on the knee. Differences between the tasks have not been examined in children. PURPOSE: To examine the difference in intralimb contributions to energy absorption during landing of SLHH and SLVH post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: 9 athletes (3 female; median age 16.1 years, IRQ 1.5, range 14.9-18.4) after ACLR (median 8.3 months post-surgery, IQR 4.1, range 6.1-13.6) completed the SLVH and SLHH while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Height/distance and energy absorption (power integral) at the hip, knee and ankle were averaged across trials during landing. The percent contribution of each joint to total energy absorption was calculated. Performance, total energy absorption, and percent energy absorption at each joint were compared across tasks and between limbs. RESULTS: SLHH and SLVH distance were shorter for ACLR compared to contralateral limbs, but significant for SLVH only (1.45 vs. 1.55, 0.31 vs. 0.34, p=0.02). Total energy absorption was lower on the ACLR side for both tasks (3.3 vs. 4.1, 3.2 vs. 3.9, p≤0.004). Distribution of energy absorption differed between tasks with SLVH having greater ankle contribution (p<0.0001) and lower contributions of the hip (p=0.0002) and knee (p=0.0008). A lower percentage of energy was absorbed by the ACLR compared with contralateral knees in both tasks (p≤0.04, Fig. 1). This was compensated by a trend toward increased energy absorption at the hip in ACLR limbs (significant for the SLHH, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Intralimb contributions to energy absorption differ between the SLVH and SLHH and there is lower energy absorption and offloading of ACLR compared with contralateral limbs in both tasks.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hops Chemistry and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.