Comparison Of Device-measured Sleep Behaviors In Home Vs. Office Work Locations.

Purpose: Healthy sleep behaviors can positively influence 24-hour movement behaviors and health outcomes. Working from home (WFH) has become common and may impact sleep by adding flexibility to the workday; however, little is known about the sleep behaviors of those who WFH vs. in-office workers. This study examined device-measured sleep duration across work locations and odds of meeting the sleep recommendation from the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines. Methods: This secondary analysis utilized baseline data from the RESET BP clinical trial. RESET BP recruited inactive, desk-based workers with untreated elevated blood pressure. Worksite location (home vs. in-office) was determined by self-report. The RESET SLEEP ancillary study was conducted in a subset of RESET BP participants (n = 174, in-office n = 96, n = 78 mean age: 44.2 ± 10.7 years, 50% women) and added sleep measurement by a wrist worn Actiwatch for 7 days. For this analysis, we used device-measured mean total sleep time (TST) to align with the sleep guideline that recommends “7-9 hours of good quality sleep”. We also assessed the odds of meeting this guideline. Linear regression compared TST, and logistic regression calculated the odds of meeting the sleep guideline across work locations, adjusting for age and job sector where appropriate. Results: Demographic characteristics did not differ across worksite location (p > 0.05). Overall, participants spent an average of 7.06 ± 0.77 (SD) hours/day sleeping. TST significantly differed across groups (p = 0.03), with office-based workers obtaining 6.94 ± 0.76 hours of sleep each night, while home-based workers obtained 7.20 ± 0.09 hours of sleep each night. Odds of meeting the 24-hour movement sleep guideline was 23% lower in those who worked in-office (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.73; p = 0.53). Conclusion: Home workers obtained more sleep than those who worked in an office and were non significantly more likely to meet the sleep duration guideline. Further research is required to understand the determinants of this increase in TST and to determine the physical and mental outcomes associated with this difference in sleep behaviors. Supported by the National Institutes of Health R01 HL134809, R01 HL147610, and UL1TR001857.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001055176.85062.d1
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Device-measured Sleep Behaviors In Home Vs. Office Work Locations.

Joshua L. Paley, Lee Stoner, Christopher E. Kline, Anthony J. Holmes et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Comparison Of Device-measured Sleep Behaviors In Home Vs. Office Work Locations.

Joshua L. Paley, Lee Stoner, Christopher E. Kline, Anthony J. Holmes, Bethany Barone Gibbs, Kelliann K. Davis
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Healthy sleep behaviors can positively influence 24-hour movement behaviors and health outcomes. Working from home (WFH) has become common and may impact sleep by adding flexibility to the workday; however, little is known about the sleep behaviors of those who WFH vs. in-office workers. This study examined device-measured sleep duration across work locations and odds of meeting the sleep recommendation from the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines. Methods: This secondary analysis utilized baseline data from the RESET BP clinical trial. RESET BP recruited inactive, desk-based workers with untreated elevated blood pressure. Worksite location (home vs. in-office) was determined by self-report. The RESET SLEEP ancillary study was conducted in a subset of RESET BP participants (n = 174, in-office n = 96, n = 78 mean age: 44.2 ± 10.7 years, 50% women) and added sleep measurement by a wrist worn Actiwatch for 7 days. For this analysis, we used device-measured mean total sleep time (TST) to align with the sleep guideline that recommends “7-9 hours of good quality sleep”. We also assessed the odds of meeting this guideline. Linear regression compared TST, and logistic regression calculated the odds of meeting the sleep guideline across work locations, adjusting for age and job sector where appropriate. Results: Demographic characteristics did not differ across worksite location (p > 0.05). Overall, participants spent an average of 7.06 ± 0.77 (SD) hours/day sleeping. TST significantly differed across groups (p = 0.03), with office-based workers obtaining 6.94 ± 0.76 hours of sleep each night, while home-based workers obtained 7.20 ± 0.09 hours of sleep each night. Odds of meeting the 24-hour movement sleep guideline was 23% lower in those who worked in-office (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.73; p = 0.53). Conclusion: Home workers obtained more sleep than those who worked in an office and were non significantly more likely to meet the sleep duration guideline. Further research is required to understand the determinants of this increase in TST and to determine the physical and mental outcomes associated with this difference in sleep behaviors. Supported by the National Institutes of Health R01 HL134809, R01 HL147610, and UL1TR001857.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), West Virginia University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.