Objective Training Load Monitoring Using Smart Swim Goggles

Modern technology and analysis methods enable training loads (TLs) to be estimated from objective measurements. Various metrics have been developed to quantify TLs, including Banister’s training impulse (bTRIMP), session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) TRIMP, and SwimScore. These metrics are expressed as a product of duration and an intensity component. The intensity component is the product of the average measure of training intensity for a session and a non-linear intensity multiplying factor (IMF). The IMF can be expressed as an exponential equation, Aebx, or a power law, Axb , with A and b as adjustable parameters. Theoretical work demonstrates that the relationships between TLs are determined primarily by the IMF. An unanswered question is the extent to which optimizing the IMF for a given TL metric can improve its association with observed changes in fitness. PURPOSE: To determine how the intensity components affect TL estimates and associations with changes in fitness. METHODS: Experienced recreational swimmers completed an individualized 12-week training program. Swimming fitness was measured through critical swim speed (CSS). We collected measures of sRPE via self-report, and measures of heart rate and swimming velocity from smart swim goggles (Form Athletica Inc., Vancouver). TL metrics were calculated from these data sources. We then iteratively adjusted the parameters of the IMFs for SwimScore and bTRIMP and evaluated the resulting association between the TLs and changes in CSS. RESULTS: Linear models fit with the change in fitness as the dependent variable and mean weekly TL as the independent variable revealed less than 50% of the variance being accounted for by the model. R2 values were 0.46, 0.09, and 0.00031 for SwimScore, bTRIMP, and sRPE-TRIMP, respectively. Adjusting the parameters for SwimScore and bTRIMP did not result in improved model fits. CONCLUSION: Manual tuning of IMF parameters did not improve the association of training loads and changes in fitness. Future research should employ formal optimization methods to find IMF parameter values that provide best-fit relationships between TLs and changes in CSS. MITACS, NSERC, Form Athletica Inc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056024.87883.99
Primary Topic
AI and Multimedia in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective Training Load Monitoring Using Smart Swim Goggles

Dan Eisenhardt, David C. Clarke, Aidan Kits, Reynald Hoskinson
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
AI and Multimedia in Education
article

Objective Training Load Monitoring Using Smart Swim Goggles

Dan Eisenhardt, David C. Clarke, Aidan Kits, Reynald Hoskinson
article en

Abstract

Modern technology and analysis methods enable training loads (TLs) to be estimated from objective measurements. Various metrics have been developed to quantify TLs, including Banister’s training impulse (bTRIMP), session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) TRIMP, and SwimScore. These metrics are expressed as a product of duration and an intensity component. The intensity component is the product of the average measure of training intensity for a session and a non-linear intensity multiplying factor (IMF). The IMF can be expressed as an exponential equation, Aebx, or a power law, Axb , with A and b as adjustable parameters. Theoretical work demonstrates that the relationships between TLs are determined primarily by the IMF. An unanswered question is the extent to which optimizing the IMF for a given TL metric can improve its association with observed changes in fitness. PURPOSE: To determine how the intensity components affect TL estimates and associations with changes in fitness. METHODS: Experienced recreational swimmers completed an individualized 12-week training program. Swimming fitness was measured through critical swim speed (CSS). We collected measures of sRPE via self-report, and measures of heart rate and swimming velocity from smart swim goggles (Form Athletica Inc., Vancouver). TL metrics were calculated from these data sources. We then iteratively adjusted the parameters of the IMFs for SwimScore and bTRIMP and evaluated the resulting association between the TLs and changes in CSS. RESULTS: Linear models fit with the change in fitness as the dependent variable and mean weekly TL as the independent variable revealed less than 50% of the variance being accounted for by the model. R2 values were 0.46, 0.09, and 0.00031 for SwimScore, bTRIMP, and sRPE-TRIMP, respectively. Adjusting the parameters for SwimScore and bTRIMP did not result in improved model fits. CONCLUSION: Manual tuning of IMF parameters did not improve the association of training loads and changes in fitness. Future research should employ formal optimization methods to find IMF parameter values that provide best-fit relationships between TLs and changes in CSS. MITACS, NSERC, Form Athletica Inc.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Simon Fraser University (CA), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
AI and Multimedia in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.