Investigation Into Lower Extremity Accommodation During Lbppt Submaximal Running

Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills (LBPPT) have gained popularity in clinical and research environments for their ability to reduce the runners’ bodyweight, consequently lowering the GRFs. The combination of repetitive vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) impacting the lower extremities and factors such as biomechanics contributes to running injury risk and LBPPT present a training opportunity for potential injury prevention and injury rehabilitation. Running in a LBPPT is novel to most runners and it is not yet known if time is needed to adapt to this new running experience. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an accommodation period present during LBPPT submaximal running in vGRF or stance time. METHODS: Participants (n = 14; 8 males, 6 females; age: 27 ± 6 years; mass: 73.12 ± 16.52 kg; height: 1.74 ± 0.10 m) were recruited to complete three 15-minute bodyweight support (BWS) running conditions at 100%, 80%, and 60% of their total bodyweight. Loadsol insoles were used to collect v GRF during running. Peak vGRF, and stance time were compared by 3 (BWS: 0%, 20%, 40%) x 8 (Time: t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8) repeated measures ANOVAs (p < .05). RESULTS: There was no interaction effect for BWS and time for peak vGRF (p = 0.78) or stance time (p = 0.27). Peak vGRF was different for BWS (F = 57.26, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.93) but not for time (F = 0.80, p = 0.503, η2 = 0.06). Peak vGRF was higher for 0% (1570.26 + 337.47 N) BWS than 20% (1465.45 + 340.07 N, p < 0.001) and 40% (1148.15 + 337.47 N, p < 0.001). Mean stance time was different for BWS (F = 26.16, p < 0.001, η2 = .59) and time (F = 2.82, p = 0.07, η2 = 0.18). On average, mean stance time was longer at minute 15 when compared to minute 1 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not observe an accommodation period for vGRF we did observe one for stance time. This highlights the importance of providing participants time to adjust to this novel running condition prior to data collection and analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001057796.93324.21
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation Into Lower Extremity Accommodation During Lbppt Submaximal Running

Miles Mercer, Julia Freedman Silvernail, Ciya Clyde
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Investigation Into Lower Extremity Accommodation During Lbppt Submaximal Running

Miles Mercer, Julia Freedman Silvernail, Ciya Clyde
article en

Abstract

Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills (LBPPT) have gained popularity in clinical and research environments for their ability to reduce the runners’ bodyweight, consequently lowering the GRFs. The combination of repetitive vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) impacting the lower extremities and factors such as biomechanics contributes to running injury risk and LBPPT present a training opportunity for potential injury prevention and injury rehabilitation. Running in a LBPPT is novel to most runners and it is not yet known if time is needed to adapt to this new running experience. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an accommodation period present during LBPPT submaximal running in vGRF or stance time. METHODS: Participants (n = 14; 8 males, 6 females; age: 27 ± 6 years; mass: 73.12 ± 16.52 kg; height: 1.74 ± 0.10 m) were recruited to complete three 15-minute bodyweight support (BWS) running conditions at 100%, 80%, and 60% of their total bodyweight. Loadsol insoles were used to collect v GRF during running. Peak vGRF, and stance time were compared by 3 (BWS: 0%, 20%, 40%) x 8 (Time: t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8) repeated measures ANOVAs (p < .05). RESULTS: There was no interaction effect for BWS and time for peak vGRF (p = 0.78) or stance time (p = 0.27). Peak vGRF was different for BWS (F = 57.26, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.93) but not for time (F = 0.80, p = 0.503, η2 = 0.06). Peak vGRF was higher for 0% (1570.26 + 337.47 N) BWS than 20% (1465.45 + 340.07 N, p < 0.001) and 40% (1148.15 + 337.47 N, p < 0.001). Mean stance time was different for BWS (F = 26.16, p < 0.001, η2 = .59) and time (F = 2.82, p = 0.07, η2 = 0.18). On average, mean stance time was longer at minute 15 when compared to minute 1 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not observe an accommodation period for vGRF we did observe one for stance time. This highlights the importance of providing participants time to adjust to this novel running condition prior to data collection and analysis.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigation Into Lower Extremity Accommodation During Lbppt Submaximal Running — Miles Mercer, Julia Freedman Silvernail, et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS