Relationship Between Central Nervous System Dysfunction And Hyperthermia In Exertional Heat Stroke Patients

Despite evidence supporting best practice for recognition and management of exertional heat stroke (EHS), there is a lack of understanding regarding the central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction observed in the clinical presentation of EHS. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to describe CNS function using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and signs and symptoms (S&Sx) in EHS patients, and (2) to determine the relationship between rectal temperature (Tre) and GCS in EHS patients. METHODS: A cross sectional research design was used by observing EHS patients (defined as >40 °C + CNS dysfunction) at an 11.3-km road race. Trained scribes recorded information on the patients’ medical records which were then de-identified for the research team. Primary outcome measures were GCS, Tre, and S&Sx. Parametric and non-parametric descriptive statistics were calculated. A Spearman’s rank or Pearson correlation was used (based on measurement type) to determine the relationship between variables. RESULTS: Runners diagnosed with EHS (male = 13, female = 10) were aged 30 ± 14y (range 15-58y), with an initial medical tent Tre of 41.0 ± 0.6 °C (40.0-42.1 °C) and GCS of 14 ± 3 (4-15). Across evaluation and treatment time points, maximum Tre for EHS patients ranged from 40.0 to 42.5 °C and GCS ranged from 0-15. There was a significant but weak correlation between Tre and GCS (rs(121) = -0.284, p = .002) and between Tre and the number of S&Sx present (r(121) = 0.288, p = 0 = .001) for all time points but no correlation between these measures when Tre was >40 °C (rs(60) = -0.209, p > 0.05). Initial recorded S&Sx included nausea (17.4% of observations), dizziness, irritability, aggressive, headache, and malaise (all 4.3%). Confusion (13%), difficulty remembering (8.7%), and irritability (8.7%) had the highest percent of observations during all time points. CONCLUSION: GCS scores in EHS patients varied widely, resulting in a weak relationship between GCS and Tre. There were several different S&Sx observations, with not one symptom representing most observations at any time point. Clinicians should be aware CNS dysfunction in EHS patients presents in a variety of ways. The presence or absence of CNS dysfunction should serve as a diagnostic measure for EHS but should not be used to determine treatment, cessation of cooling, or EHS severity. ACSM Clinical Sports Medicine Endowment; Mid-Atlantic Athletic Trainers' Assoc Grant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061684.47025.44
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship Between Central Nervous System Dysfunction And Hyperthermia In Exertional Heat Stroke Patients

John F. Jardine, Samantha E. Scarneo‐Miller, Chris Troyanos, Rebecca M. Lopez et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Relationship Between Central Nervous System Dysfunction And Hyperthermia In Exertional Heat Stroke Patients

John F. Jardine, Samantha E. Scarneo‐Miller, Chris Troyanos, Rebecca M. Lopez, Susan W. Yeargin
article en

Abstract

Despite evidence supporting best practice for recognition and management of exertional heat stroke (EHS), there is a lack of understanding regarding the central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction observed in the clinical presentation of EHS. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to describe CNS function using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and signs and symptoms (S&Sx) in EHS patients, and (2) to determine the relationship between rectal temperature (Tre) and GCS in EHS patients. METHODS: A cross sectional research design was used by observing EHS patients (defined as >40 °C + CNS dysfunction) at an 11.3-km road race. Trained scribes recorded information on the patients’ medical records which were then de-identified for the research team. Primary outcome measures were GCS, Tre, and S&Sx. Parametric and non-parametric descriptive statistics were calculated. A Spearman’s rank or Pearson correlation was used (based on measurement type) to determine the relationship between variables. RESULTS: Runners diagnosed with EHS (male = 13, female = 10) were aged 30 ± 14y (range 15-58y), with an initial medical tent Tre of 41.0 ± 0.6 °C (40.0-42.1 °C) and GCS of 14 ± 3 (4-15). Across evaluation and treatment time points, maximum Tre for EHS patients ranged from 40.0 to 42.5 °C and GCS ranged from 0-15. There was a significant but weak correlation between Tre and GCS (rs(121) = -0.284, p = .002) and between Tre and the number of S&Sx present (r(121) = 0.288, p = 0 = .001) for all time points but no correlation between these measures when Tre was >40 °C (rs(60) = -0.209, p > 0.05). Initial recorded S&Sx included nausea (17.4% of observations), dizziness, irritability, aggressive, headache, and malaise (all 4.3%). Confusion (13%), difficulty remembering (8.7%), and irritability (8.7%) had the highest percent of observations during all time points. CONCLUSION: GCS scores in EHS patients varied widely, resulting in a weak relationship between GCS and Tre. There were several different S&Sx observations, with not one symptom representing most observations at any time point. Clinicians should be aware CNS dysfunction in EHS patients presents in a variety of ways. The presence or absence of CNS dysfunction should serve as a diagnostic measure for EHS but should not be used to determine treatment, cessation of cooling, or EHS severity. ACSM Clinical Sports Medicine Endowment; Mid-Atlantic Athletic Trainers' Assoc Grant

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
West Virginia University (US), University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.