Quadriceps Neuromuscular Performance In Mid- And Late-phase Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With A Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Neuromuscular studies following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-ACLR) suggest reduced quadriceps performance in the involved versus the uninvolved limbs at least one year after surgery, but no data are available at earlier time points. PURPOSE: This work aimed to provide initial results on quadriceps peak torque (PT) across mid and late rehabilitation phases following QT-ACLR. We hypothesized that the mid-phase group would show lower PT at all isokinetic speeds compared to the late-phase group in the involved limbs, but both groups would show deficits in their involved compared to uninvolved limbs across all speed conditions. METHODS: 31 patients (Mid – M/F: 8/7, Age: 26.8 ± 9.6 years, Time Since Surgery: 26.2 ± 3.2 weeks; Late – M/F: 10/6, Age: 27.4 ± 10.1 years, Time Since Surgery: 46.6 ± 8.5 weeks) with QT-ACLR were tested on an isokinetic dynamometer either >5-to-8 months (mid-phase) or >8-to-15 months (late-phase) after surgery. Isokinetic testing was conducted for knee extension and flexion at 60, 180, and 300 deg·s-1. Quadriceps’ PT was extracted from three consecutive repetitions at each speed. A mixed repeated measures ANOVA (leg x speed x phase) with LSD post hoc testing was used to determine significant main effects or interactions among factors. RESULTS: A significant interaction (leg x speed x phase) was found for PT (F[2,58]=6.329, p < .05, η2 = .179, observed power = .884). Post hoc comparisons showed significantly lower PT in the involved limbs of mid- compared to late-phase across 60 (MD±SE: -51.20 ± 17.48 Nm, p < .01, Cohen’s d = 1.05), 180 (MD±SE: -32.74 ± 13.74 Nm, p < .05, Cohen’s d = .86), and 300 (MD±SE: -30.58 ± 11.59 Nm, p < .05, Cohen’s d = .93) deg·s-1. No significant differences were found between groups for the uninvolved limb. For the mid-phase group, the involved limb produced significantly lower PT than the uninvolved limb at all speeds, whereas the late-phase group produced lower PT at 60 (p < .01) and 180 (p < .05), but not 300 deg·s-1 (p = .144). Lastly, for both groups and in both limbs, there was a significant reduction in PT across speeds. CONCLUSION: Mid- and late-phase recovery of quadriceps PT is not evident in the current work, but recovery of PT at 300 deg·s-1 may be an important milestone in return to sport following QT-ACLR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056476.74854.88
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quadriceps Neuromuscular Performance In Mid- And Late-phase Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With A Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Michael Letter, Thomas Michael Best, Lee D. Kaplan, Moataz Eltoukhy et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Quadriceps Neuromuscular Performance In Mid- And Late-phase Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With A Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Michael Letter, Thomas Michael Best, Lee D. Kaplan, Moataz Eltoukhy, Michael G. Baraga, Joseph P. Costello, Joseph F. Signorile, Zachary Ripic, Jordan Eskenazi, Rachel Rumana
article en

Abstract

Neuromuscular studies following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-ACLR) suggest reduced quadriceps performance in the involved versus the uninvolved limbs at least one year after surgery, but no data are available at earlier time points. PURPOSE: This work aimed to provide initial results on quadriceps peak torque (PT) across mid and late rehabilitation phases following QT-ACLR. We hypothesized that the mid-phase group would show lower PT at all isokinetic speeds compared to the late-phase group in the involved limbs, but both groups would show deficits in their involved compared to uninvolved limbs across all speed conditions. METHODS: 31 patients (Mid – M/F: 8/7, Age: 26.8 ± 9.6 years, Time Since Surgery: 26.2 ± 3.2 weeks; Late – M/F: 10/6, Age: 27.4 ± 10.1 years, Time Since Surgery: 46.6 ± 8.5 weeks) with QT-ACLR were tested on an isokinetic dynamometer either >5-to-8 months (mid-phase) or >8-to-15 months (late-phase) after surgery. Isokinetic testing was conducted for knee extension and flexion at 60, 180, and 300 deg·s-1. Quadriceps’ PT was extracted from three consecutive repetitions at each speed. A mixed repeated measures ANOVA (leg x speed x phase) with LSD post hoc testing was used to determine significant main effects or interactions among factors. RESULTS: A significant interaction (leg x speed x phase) was found for PT (F[2,58]=6.329, p < .05, η2 = .179, observed power = .884). Post hoc comparisons showed significantly lower PT in the involved limbs of mid- compared to late-phase across 60 (MD±SE: -51.20 ± 17.48 Nm, p < .01, Cohen’s d = 1.05), 180 (MD±SE: -32.74 ± 13.74 Nm, p < .05, Cohen’s d = .86), and 300 (MD±SE: -30.58 ± 11.59 Nm, p < .05, Cohen’s d = .93) deg·s-1. No significant differences were found between groups for the uninvolved limb. For the mid-phase group, the involved limb produced significantly lower PT than the uninvolved limb at all speeds, whereas the late-phase group produced lower PT at 60 (p < .01) and 180 (p < .05), but not 300 deg·s-1 (p = .144). Lastly, for both groups and in both limbs, there was a significant reduction in PT across speeds. CONCLUSION: Mid- and late-phase recovery of quadriceps PT is not evident in the current work, but recovery of PT at 300 deg·s-1 may be an important milestone in return to sport following QT-ACLR.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Miami (US), Jacobs (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.