The ECHO-R Exercise Trial For Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Robust Evidence In An Understudied Population

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether international exercise oncology guidelines are fit-for-purpose for people with rare cancers, poor survival prospects, and high morbidity. The ECHO-R trial evaluates the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of a 6-month exercise intervention in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: 50 women receiving chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer were recruited to this pre-post, mixed-method exercise trial. The intervention included 12 telephone sessions and five in-person sessions with Accredited Exercise Physiologists. The weekly exercise target was consistent with international guidelines - 150 minutes of moderate-intensity, multimodal exercise per week. Primary outcomes were feasibility (minutes exercise completed) and harms profile (exercise-related adverse outcomes) of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL; FACT-O), fatigue (FACT-Fatigue), anxiety and depression (HADS), and neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) which were assessed pre- and post-intervention. 13 women participated in post-intervention qualitative interviews providing a deeper understanding of factors influencing exercise participation. RESULTS: The average minutes of weekly exercise completed did not meet the target (median 142 min/week, min: 0; max 533). 38% of the sample reported ≥1 harm (range 0-7 harms/person; no serious harms reported), with 71% of harms impacting exercise participation (11% moderate-major impact). There was no meaningful change in health outcomes observed between pre- and post-intervention. The importance of social support and the physical environment, the hurdles of side effects, the power of advice from health professionals, a “yearning” for the outdoors and a tendency to “resort” to walking emerged as qualitative themes influencing physical activity participation. CONCLUSION: Exercise was deemed safe, but weekly exercise targets were typically unachievable and benefit not guaranteed. To help patients overcome changing exercise barriers, exercise professionals need clinical skill in behavior change. Those delivering exercise therapy to people with recurrent ovarian cancer should focus on each person’s “why” and that factors influencing exercise participation may be more psychosocial than physical. National Health and Medical Research Centre, Medical Research Future Fund—Emerging Priorities and Consumer-Driven Research Initiative (Grant ID: MRF1200120)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060808.73204.e6
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ECHO-R Exercise Trial For Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Robust Evidence In An Understudied Population

Andreas Obermair, Melanie L. Plinsinga, Dimitrios Vagenas, Sheree Rye et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

The ECHO-R Exercise Trial For Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Robust Evidence In An Understudied Population

Andreas Obermair, Melanie L. Plinsinga, Dimitrios Vagenas, Sheree Rye, Carolina X. Sandler, James Nicklin, Penelope M. Webb, Vanessa L. Beesley, Andrea Garret, Catherine Shannon, Louisa Collins, Tamara L. Jones, Jermaine Coward, Monika Janda, Rosalind R. Spence, Merran Williams, Sandra C. Hayes, Elizabeth Eakin, Sara Baniahmadi, Gabrielle C. Gildea, Jeffrey C. Goh, Nicolly Melissa, Marcelo Nascimento, Hélène O'Neill
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether international exercise oncology guidelines are fit-for-purpose for people with rare cancers, poor survival prospects, and high morbidity. The ECHO-R trial evaluates the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of a 6-month exercise intervention in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: 50 women receiving chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer were recruited to this pre-post, mixed-method exercise trial. The intervention included 12 telephone sessions and five in-person sessions with Accredited Exercise Physiologists. The weekly exercise target was consistent with international guidelines - 150 minutes of moderate-intensity, multimodal exercise per week. Primary outcomes were feasibility (minutes exercise completed) and harms profile (exercise-related adverse outcomes) of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL; FACT-O), fatigue (FACT-Fatigue), anxiety and depression (HADS), and neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) which were assessed pre- and post-intervention. 13 women participated in post-intervention qualitative interviews providing a deeper understanding of factors influencing exercise participation. RESULTS: The average minutes of weekly exercise completed did not meet the target (median 142 min/week, min: 0; max 533). 38% of the sample reported ≥1 harm (range 0-7 harms/person; no serious harms reported), with 71% of harms impacting exercise participation (11% moderate-major impact). There was no meaningful change in health outcomes observed between pre- and post-intervention. The importance of social support and the physical environment, the hurdles of side effects, the power of advice from health professionals, a “yearning” for the outdoors and a tendency to “resort” to walking emerged as qualitative themes influencing physical activity participation. CONCLUSION: Exercise was deemed safe, but weekly exercise targets were typically unachievable and benefit not guaranteed. To help patients overcome changing exercise barriers, exercise professionals need clinical skill in behavior change. Those delivering exercise therapy to people with recurrent ovarian cancer should focus on each person’s “why” and that factors influencing exercise participation may be more psychosocial than physical. National Health and Medical Research Centre, Medical Research Future Fund—Emerging Priorities and Consumer-Driven Research Initiative (Grant ID: MRF1200120)

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Griffith University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.