Caffeine And Sports Performance: Just A Matter Of Timing? A Pilot Study

Caffeine (CAF) is a performance-enhancing supplement for exercise and cognitive tasks through its effects on the central nervous system. Several factors may moderate these effects, including supplement timing, though little evidence exists to support this affirmation. PURPOSE: To determine the influence of timing of CAF supplementation on its exercise- and cognitive-performance enhancing capacity. METHODS: Eight recreationally trained participants (age: 25±5 y, body mass: 70.6 ± 7.6 kg) performed a familiarization to all experimental procedures followed by two main experimental visits in which participants received either CAF (4 mg/kg, CAF) or placebo (4 mg/kg flour, PLA). A computer-based Flanker test and three 20-m sprints were performed at four time points: baseline (0M), 30 (30M), 60 (60M) and 90 (90M) min following capsule ingestion. Data were analysed with liner mixed models nested by participant ID and corrected by baseline (0M) values. RESULTS: 20-m sprints: No interaction was significant (all p≥0.33). Moderate to large effect sizes were found for mean sprint time at 30M (d=0.9), 60M (d=0.7), and 90 m (d=0.5), and for best sprint time at 30M (d=0.8), 60M (d=0.7), and 90M (d=0.6), all favouring CAF. Flanker test: Except for accuracy after incongruent stimuli at 90M (p-value for interaction=0.02, post-hoc p-value =0.009, d=1.2), no other interactions were significant (all p≥0.30). Small effects were seen for overall reaction time at 30M (d=0.3), 60M (d=0.2), and 90M (d=0.4), and small to large effects for mean response time for congruent stimuli at 30M (d=0.9), 60M (d=0.5) and 90M (d=0.4), all benefitting CAF. CONCLUSION: Caffeine did not significantly influence 20-m sprint performance, although effect sizes were moderate to large in favour of CAF at all timepoints. Similarly, some cognitive performance differences were evident with CAF based on effect sizes. A lack of statistical significance is likely due to the small sample size. Since sprint performance was not significantly different between timepoints with placebo, these pilot data suggest that these exercise and cognitive tests may be suitable to determine the influence of timing on CAF’s performance-enhancing effect. São Paulo Research Foundation: 2021/06836-0; 2020/12036-3; 2021/12116-0

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056844.55936.45
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caffeine And Sports Performance: Just A Matter Of Timing? A Pilot Study

Bryan Saunders, Lars R. McNaughton, Gabriel Barreto
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Coffee research and impacts
article

Caffeine And Sports Performance: Just A Matter Of Timing? A Pilot Study

Bryan Saunders, Lars R. McNaughton, Gabriel Barreto
article en

Abstract

Caffeine (CAF) is a performance-enhancing supplement for exercise and cognitive tasks through its effects on the central nervous system. Several factors may moderate these effects, including supplement timing, though little evidence exists to support this affirmation. PURPOSE: To determine the influence of timing of CAF supplementation on its exercise- and cognitive-performance enhancing capacity. METHODS: Eight recreationally trained participants (age: 25±5 y, body mass: 70.6 ± 7.6 kg) performed a familiarization to all experimental procedures followed by two main experimental visits in which participants received either CAF (4 mg/kg, CAF) or placebo (4 mg/kg flour, PLA). A computer-based Flanker test and three 20-m sprints were performed at four time points: baseline (0M), 30 (30M), 60 (60M) and 90 (90M) min following capsule ingestion. Data were analysed with liner mixed models nested by participant ID and corrected by baseline (0M) values. RESULTS: 20-m sprints: No interaction was significant (all p≥0.33). Moderate to large effect sizes were found for mean sprint time at 30M (d=0.9), 60M (d=0.7), and 90 m (d=0.5), and for best sprint time at 30M (d=0.8), 60M (d=0.7), and 90M (d=0.6), all favouring CAF. Flanker test: Except for accuracy after incongruent stimuli at 90M (p-value for interaction=0.02, post-hoc p-value =0.009, d=1.2), no other interactions were significant (all p≥0.30). Small effects were seen for overall reaction time at 30M (d=0.3), 60M (d=0.2), and 90M (d=0.4), and small to large effects for mean response time for congruent stimuli at 30M (d=0.9), 60M (d=0.5) and 90M (d=0.4), all benefitting CAF. CONCLUSION: Caffeine did not significantly influence 20-m sprint performance, although effect sizes were moderate to large in favour of CAF at all timepoints. Similarly, some cognitive performance differences were evident with CAF based on effect sizes. A lack of statistical significance is likely due to the small sample size. Since sprint performance was not significantly different between timepoints with placebo, these pilot data suggest that these exercise and cognitive tests may be suitable to determine the influence of timing on CAF’s performance-enhancing effect. São Paulo Research Foundation: 2021/06836-0; 2020/12036-3; 2021/12116-0

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Edge Hill University (GB), Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.