Blood Pressure Responses To Exercise At Different Times Of Day

Elevated resting blood pressure (BP), or hypertension, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exaggerated exercise BP (EEBP) is an elevated BP at submaximal and maximal exercise and is associated with increased CVD morbidity and mortality. Due to BP’s circadian rhythm and varying chronotypes in the population, it is unknown if exercise performed at certain times of the day will elicit higher BP responses, thus complicating the identification of EEBPs. PURPOSE: To determine how exercise BPs change throughout the day in normotensive adults. METHODS: 31 healthy adults [male = 16, mean age ± standard deviation = 23 ± 4 years] completed a modified Bruce treadmill protocol at 3 different times of day: morning (M, 0700-0900 h), afternoon (A, 1300-1500 h), evening (E, 1800-2000 h). Systolic BP (SBP) was measured pre-exercise (standing prior to test start), and during the last minute of each stage using an automated device. Submaximal SBP was determined from stage 4 of the test; peak SBP was the highest SBP recorded. ΔSBP was calculated as peak SBP-pre-exercise SBP. Participants completed a Morning-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) to determine chronotype. Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between MEQ score and ΔSBP during M and E tests. Submaximal, peak and ΔSBP were compared between test times with one-way repeated measures analysis of variance or non-parametric Friedman tests with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Submaximal SBP (P = 0.295), peak SBP (P = 0.087) and ΔSBP (P = 0.546) were similar across time points. Submaximal SBPs (median, interquartile range) were M:154,140-174 mmHg; A:154, 143-171 mmHg; E:159, 146-174 mmHg. Submaximal EEBP was defined as SBP ≥ 170 mmHg; 15 participants had EEBP during at least one test, 5 had an EEBP during all tests. MEQ scores were correlated with ΔSBP during E test suggesting individuals that were more evening types had a smaller increase in exercise SBP compared to more morning or intermediate types (r = 0.363, P = 0.045); M ΔSBP and MEQ score were not correlated (r = 0.034, P = 0.854). CONCLUSION: Time of day had no effect on BP response to exercise. Given the clinical value of EEBP, it is notable that 48% of our normotensive sample had EEBP during at least one test. Determining the relationship between chronotype and exercise BPs throughout the day is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056096.90403.f4
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Pressure Responses To Exercise At Different Times Of Day

Katharine D. Currie, Amy E. Boettcher, Hannah E. Penfold
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Blood Pressure Responses To Exercise At Different Times Of Day

Katharine D. Currie, Amy E. Boettcher, Hannah E. Penfold
article en

Abstract

Elevated resting blood pressure (BP), or hypertension, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exaggerated exercise BP (EEBP) is an elevated BP at submaximal and maximal exercise and is associated with increased CVD morbidity and mortality. Due to BP’s circadian rhythm and varying chronotypes in the population, it is unknown if exercise performed at certain times of the day will elicit higher BP responses, thus complicating the identification of EEBPs. PURPOSE: To determine how exercise BPs change throughout the day in normotensive adults. METHODS: 31 healthy adults [male = 16, mean age ± standard deviation = 23 ± 4 years] completed a modified Bruce treadmill protocol at 3 different times of day: morning (M, 0700-0900 h), afternoon (A, 1300-1500 h), evening (E, 1800-2000 h). Systolic BP (SBP) was measured pre-exercise (standing prior to test start), and during the last minute of each stage using an automated device. Submaximal SBP was determined from stage 4 of the test; peak SBP was the highest SBP recorded. ΔSBP was calculated as peak SBP-pre-exercise SBP. Participants completed a Morning-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) to determine chronotype. Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between MEQ score and ΔSBP during M and E tests. Submaximal, peak and ΔSBP were compared between test times with one-way repeated measures analysis of variance or non-parametric Friedman tests with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Submaximal SBP (P = 0.295), peak SBP (P = 0.087) and ΔSBP (P = 0.546) were similar across time points. Submaximal SBPs (median, interquartile range) were M:154,140-174 mmHg; A:154, 143-171 mmHg; E:159, 146-174 mmHg. Submaximal EEBP was defined as SBP ≥ 170 mmHg; 15 participants had EEBP during at least one test, 5 had an EEBP during all tests. MEQ scores were correlated with ΔSBP during E test suggesting individuals that were more evening types had a smaller increase in exercise SBP compared to more morning or intermediate types (r = 0.363, P = 0.045); M ΔSBP and MEQ score were not correlated (r = 0.034, P = 0.854). CONCLUSION: Time of day had no effect on BP response to exercise. Given the clinical value of EEBP, it is notable that 48% of our normotensive sample had EEBP during at least one test. Determining the relationship between chronotype and exercise BPs throughout the day is warranted.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.